Daily-Life Fatigue in Mild to Moderate Hearing Impairment: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
Journal
Ear and hearing
ISSN: 1538-4667
Titre abrégé: Ear Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous research has indicated an association between hearing impairment (HI) and daily-life fatigue. However, the temporal and contextual correlates of such fatigue are largely unexplored. The present study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine (1) whether people with HI are more fatigued than people with normal hearing, (2) whether individuals with HI and normal hearing (NH) show similar diurnal patterns of fatigue, (3) whether people with HI spend less time in challenging listening situations compared with NH controls, and (4) whether more challenging listening situations are associated with more fatigue and whether hearing ability influences any observed association. After excluding 22 participants with self-reported fatiguing health conditions from analyses, the participant sample consisted of 24 adults with HI and 20 adults with NH, aged 44 to 77 years (M = 65.4, SD = 7.5). Data were collected using smartphones and a commercially available EMA app, which ran the specified EMA protocol for this study. Participants responded to six smartphone surveys per day for two weeks. "In-the-moment" questions asked participants to report on their listening situation and to rate their current level of fatigue ("momentary fatigue") at quasi-random time points throughout the day. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Hearing group (HI versus NH) was unrelated to trait, daily, and momentary fatigue; both participants with HI and NH became increasingly fatigued throughout the day and at a similar rate. Challenging listening situations occurred infrequently both for HI and NH groups. Participants with NH were more likely to report that there were people speaking in the background whom they were trying to ignore, but participants with HI were more likely to report a greater number of background speakers. No associations were found between within-person listening situations and momentary fatigue, but person-mean listening activity and conversational status were related to momentary fatigue. Notably, having tinnitus was positively related to momentary fatigue, after controlling for other covariates. Finally, having a fatiguing health condition was a strong predictor of both trait and momentary fatigue. This is the first study to explore and compare fatigue across HI and NH groups using EMA. Contrary to expectations, the groups showed similar levels and diurnal patterns of fatigue, and fatigue was mostly unrelated to aspects of the listening environment. Between-person differences, although statistically significant, produced small effect sizes and therefore must be accepted cautiously. Issues with group matching, the measurement of fatigue, and perceived hearing-related difficulties among participants with NH are notable limitations. However, this study makes a novel contribution to both EMA and hearing research and demonstrates the importance of screening for fatiguing health conditions. Further research is warranted, particularly with individuals with more severe HI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33136628
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000888
pii: 00003446-202011000-00010
pmc: PMC7722466
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1518-1532Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S003576/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office [UK]
Pays : International
Références
Cancer. 1999 Mar 1;85(5):1186-96
pubmed: 10091805
Am J Audiol. 2014 Mar;23(1):129-34
pubmed: 23824428
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:92S-100S
pubmed: 27355776
Ear Hear. 1982 May-Jun;3(3):128-34
pubmed: 7095321
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):179-290
pubmed: 21960147
Am J Audiol. 2017 Oct 12;26(3S):436-442
pubmed: 29049626
Br J Audiol. 1988 Nov;22(4):251-64
pubmed: 3242715
Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):497-507
pubmed: 22531573
Ear Hear. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):e1-10
pubmed: 26295606
J Behav Med. 2004 Oct;27(5):425-44
pubmed: 15675633
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:5S-27S
pubmed: 27355771
Int J Audiol. 2006 Sep;45(9):503-12
pubmed: 17005493
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):872-84
pubmed: 26554491
Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Jun;10(3):185-93
pubmed: 9335630
J Behav Med. 2017 Oct;40(5):772-783
pubmed: 28281106
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e39-e48
pubmed: 27541332
BMJ. 2010 Nov 23;341:c6149
pubmed: 21098617
Psychooncology. 2010 May;19(5):462-71
pubmed: 19358230
Int J Audiol. 2009;48(10):684-91
pubmed: 19863354
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):527-40
pubmed: 27406660
Int J Behav Med. 2008 Jan-Mar;15(1):29-33
pubmed: 18444018
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517734088
pubmed: 28982021
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul 02;42(1):1-11
pubmed: 32639255
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):849-56
pubmed: 18512720
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016 Apr;28(2):297-302
pubmed: 26063637
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518783608
pubmed: 29956590
Biol Psychiatry. 1993 Jul 1-15;34(1-2):84-90
pubmed: 8373941
J Psychosom Res. 2003 Apr;54(4):345-52
pubmed: 12670612
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(21):2927-37
pubmed: 19735344
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Aug;27(8):1635-43
pubmed: 21699365
Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):23-34
pubmed: 23157603
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):523-34
pubmed: 23426091
Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):753-61
pubmed: 24053226
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan;57(1):21-30
pubmed: 29132260
Am J Audiol. 2019 Sep 13;28(3):686-696
pubmed: 31430174
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jul;58(7):408-416
pubmed: 31032678
Ear Hear. 1990 Dec;11(6):430-3
pubmed: 2073976
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):697-711
pubmed: 23072962
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80
pubmed: 15576620
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:136S-44S
pubmed: 27355763
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902