Platinum-Quality Mitogenome Haplotypes from United States Populations.
DNA Fingerprinting
/ methods
DNA, Mitochondrial
/ genetics
Female
Genome, Mitochondrial
/ genetics
Haplotypes
/ genetics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Male
Mitochondria
/ genetics
Platinum
/ chemistry
Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ methods
United States
/ epidemiology
haplogroup
haplotype
mitogenome
mtDNA
next-generation sequencing
population statistics
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2020
29 10 2020
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
revised:
26
10
2020
accepted:
27
10
2020
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
24
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A total of 1327 platinum-quality mitochondrial DNA haplotypes from United States (U.S.) populations were generated using a robust, semi-automated next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow with rigorous quality control (QC). The laboratory workflow involved long-range PCR to minimize the co-amplification of nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments (NUMTs), PCR-free library preparation to reduce amplification bias, and high-coverage Illumina MiSeq sequencing to produce an average per-sample read depth of 1000 × for low-frequency (5%) variant detection. Point heteroplasmies below 10% frequency were confirmed through replicate amplification, and length heteroplasmy was quantitatively assessed using a custom read count analysis tool. Data analysis involved a redundant, dual-analyst review to minimize errors in haplotype reporting with additional QC checks performed by EMPOP. Applying these methods, eight sample sets were processed from five U.S. metapopulations (African American, Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian American, and Native American) corresponding to self-reported identity at the time of sample collection. Population analyses (e.g., haplotype frequencies, random match probabilities, and genetic distance estimates) were performed to evaluate the eight datasets, with over 95% of haplotypes unique per dataset. The platinum-quality mitogenome haplotypes presented in this study will enable forensic statistical calculations and thereby support the usage of mitogenome sequencing in forensic laboratories.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33138247
pii: genes11111290
doi: 10.3390/genes11111290
pmc: PMC7716222
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Mitochondrial
0
Platinum
49DFR088MY
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Hum Mutat. 2010 Dec;31(12):E1875-93
pubmed: 20886636
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1150-60
pubmed: 12384858
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020 Jul;412(19):4749-4760
pubmed: 32474725
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):E4546-7
pubmed: 25319266
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Jul;29:174-180
pubmed: 28448897
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 13;107(15):6759-64
pubmed: 20351276
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jan;44:102205
pubmed: 31783338
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Jun;1(2):154-7
pubmed: 19083747
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;84(6):740-59
pubmed: 19500773
Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):147
pubmed: 10508508
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:131-9
pubmed: 26009256
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jan;38:77-85
pubmed: 30368110
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14308-13
pubmed: 23940335
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jan;14:141-55
pubmed: 25450785
Investig Genet. 2013 Dec 02;4(1):26
pubmed: 24289217
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Jun;1(2):88-92
pubmed: 19083735
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Mar;15:8-15
pubmed: 25438934
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13833-8
pubmed: 26504230
Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457-65
pubmed: 7219534
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 8;11(1):1740
pubmed: 32269217
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:90-98
pubmed: 28193506
J Mol Evol. 2009 May;68(5):516-27
pubmed: 19407924
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Sep;24:18-23
pubmed: 27243782
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:121-7
pubmed: 25113576
Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1215
pubmed: 3344216
Biotechnol Adv. 2020 Jul - Aug;41:107537
pubmed: 32199980
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 02;8(10):e74636
pubmed: 24098342
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:213-224
pubmed: 30059903
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jul;59(4):1064-73
pubmed: 24738853
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Sep;7(5):543-9
pubmed: 23948325
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:204-214
pubmed: 30241075
Bioinformatics. 2014 Oct;30(19):2811-2
pubmed: 24930139
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Dec;4(1):e45-52
pubmed: 19948325
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Nov;133(6):1641-1650
pubmed: 30687898
PLoS Genet. 2013 Nov;9(11):e1003925
pubmed: 24244192
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:25-36
pubmed: 29413633
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:189-197
pubmed: 29080494
Hum Mutat. 2009 Feb;30(2):E386-94
pubmed: 18853457
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Sep;12:128-35
pubmed: 24973578
Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7
pubmed: 21565059
Bioinformatics. 2020 Jul 24;:
pubmed: 32706871
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:20-9
pubmed: 25051226
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 May;30(5):434-9
pubmed: 22522955
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Sep;30:81-92
pubmed: 28651097
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:134-42
pubmed: 25117402
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:139-148
pubmed: 26919661
Electrophoresis. 2018 Nov;39(21):2785-2797
pubmed: 30151910
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Mar;2(2):e19-23
pubmed: 19083798
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Dec;85(6):929-33; author reply 933
pubmed: 20004768
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Jun;5(3):222-5
pubmed: 20457096
BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 16;14:881
pubmed: 24341507
Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Jul;20(4):1126-1131
pubmed: 32061017
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 May;46:102232
pubmed: 31986343
Investig Genet. 2015 Mar 10;6:3
pubmed: 25798216
Nat Methods. 2009 Apr;6(4):291-5
pubmed: 19287394
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Mar;5(2):138-41
pubmed: 21067986
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Mar;5(2):133-7
pubmed: 21067984
PLoS Genet. 2016 Mar 15;12(3):e1005939
pubmed: 26978189
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D41-D47
pubmed: 29140468