Clustering analysis of large-scale phenotypic data in the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
accepted: 09 10 2020
entrez: 3 11 2020
pubmed: 4 11 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

With 9730 protein-coding genes and a nearly complete gene knockout strain collection, Neurospora crassa is a major model organism for filamentous fungi. Despite this abundance of information, the phenotypes of these gene knockout mutants have not been categorized to determine whether there are broad correlations between phenotype and any genetic features. Here, we analyze data for 10 different growth or developmental phenotypes that have been obtained for 1168 N. crassa knockout mutants. Of these mutants, 265 (23%) are in the normal range, while 903 (77%) possess at least one mutant phenotype. With the exception of unclassified functions, the distribution of functional categories for genes in the mutant dataset mirrors that of the N. crassa genome. In contrast, most genes do not possess a yeast ortholog, suggesting that our analysis will reveal functions that are not conserved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To leverage the phenotypic data to identify pathways, we used weighted Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) approach with 40 clusters. We found that genes encoding metabolic, transmembrane and protein phosphorylation-related genes are concentrated in subsets of clusters. Results from K-Means clustering of transcriptomic datasets showed that most phenotypic clusters contain multiple expression profiles, suggesting that co-expression is not generally observed for genes with shared phenotypes. Analysis of yeast orthologs of genes that co-clustered in MAPK signaling cascades revealed potential networks of interacting proteins in N. crassa. Our results demonstrate that clustering analysis of phenotypes is a promising tool for generating new hypotheses regarding involvement of genes in cellular pathways in N. crassa. Furthermore, information about gene clusters identified in N. crassa should be applicable to other filamentous fungi, including saprobes and pathogens.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
With 9730 protein-coding genes and a nearly complete gene knockout strain collection, Neurospora crassa is a major model organism for filamentous fungi. Despite this abundance of information, the phenotypes of these gene knockout mutants have not been categorized to determine whether there are broad correlations between phenotype and any genetic features.
RESULTS RESULTS
Here, we analyze data for 10 different growth or developmental phenotypes that have been obtained for 1168 N. crassa knockout mutants. Of these mutants, 265 (23%) are in the normal range, while 903 (77%) possess at least one mutant phenotype. With the exception of unclassified functions, the distribution of functional categories for genes in the mutant dataset mirrors that of the N. crassa genome. In contrast, most genes do not possess a yeast ortholog, suggesting that our analysis will reveal functions that are not conserved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To leverage the phenotypic data to identify pathways, we used weighted Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) approach with 40 clusters. We found that genes encoding metabolic, transmembrane and protein phosphorylation-related genes are concentrated in subsets of clusters. Results from K-Means clustering of transcriptomic datasets showed that most phenotypic clusters contain multiple expression profiles, suggesting that co-expression is not generally observed for genes with shared phenotypes. Analysis of yeast orthologs of genes that co-clustered in MAPK signaling cascades revealed potential networks of interacting proteins in N. crassa.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that clustering analysis of phenotypes is a promising tool for generating new hypotheses regarding involvement of genes in cellular pathways in N. crassa. Furthermore, information about gene clusters identified in N. crassa should be applicable to other filamentous fungi, including saprobes and pathogens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33138786
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07131-7
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-07131-7
pmc: PMC7607824
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fungal Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

755

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : GM068087
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : GM086565
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : CA-R-PPA-6980-H
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : CA-R-PPA-5062-H

Références

Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67:477-98
pubmed: 23808333
Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12A):2382-94
pubmed: 1459460
Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;5(4):849-55
pubmed: 3157864
Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 May;13(4):414-30
pubmed: 22471698
PLoS Genet. 2014 Nov 20;10(11):e1004783
pubmed: 25412208
Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 22;21(4):R139-40
pubmed: 21334288
Adv Genet. 2007;57:49-96
pubmed: 17352902
mBio. 2019 Mar 26;10(2):
pubmed: 30914504
Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Aug;8(8):1197-217
pubmed: 19542307
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1979 Feb;1(2):224-7
pubmed: 21868852
J Biosci. 2010 Mar;35(1):119-26
pubmed: 20413916
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):532-8
pubmed: 11823187
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003126
pubmed: 23935467
Cell Microbiol. 2017 Apr;19(4):
pubmed: 27706915
Biol Chem. 2002 Mar-Apr;383(3-4):569-75
pubmed: 12033445
J Fungi (Basel). 2018 Mar 20;4(1):
pubmed: 30152809
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;722:191-8
pubmed: 21590422
Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Sep;5(9):1503-16
pubmed: 16963633
Genes Dev. 1998 Sep 15;12(18):2874-86
pubmed: 9744864
PLoS Pathog. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002310
pubmed: 22028654
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Sep 7;7(9):2945-2956
pubmed: 28696922
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Aug;10(8):1100-9
pubmed: 21666072
Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12A):2373-81
pubmed: 1459459
Genetics. 2016 May;203(1):319-34
pubmed: 27029735
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Oct 13;5(12):2729-43
pubmed: 26464358
Eukaryot Cell. 2013 Jan;12(1):59-69
pubmed: 23125351
Genetics. 2013 Nov;195(3):883-98
pubmed: 24037267
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 11;8(1):15168
pubmed: 30310096
Genetics. 2010 Dec;186(4):1217-30
pubmed: 20876563
J Theor Biol. 1990 Jan 23;142(2):201-21
pubmed: 2352433
Science. 2002 Dec 6;298(5600):1911-2
pubmed: 12471242
Plant Physiol. 1979 Jun;63(6):1049-54
pubmed: 16660855
Eukaryot Cell. 2014 Jan;13(1):154-69
pubmed: 24243796
Redox Biol. 2017 Apr;11:192-204
pubmed: 27984790
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Apr 2;12:77
pubmed: 30988699
Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0001
pubmed: 16738548
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Mar;68(1):1-108
pubmed: 15007097
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D700-5
pubmed: 22110037
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Nov;10(11):1553-64
pubmed: 21965514
Front Physiol. 2012 Sep 18;3:355
pubmed: 23060802
Med Mycol. 2019 Apr 1;57(Supplement_2):S145-S154
pubmed: 30816978
Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 Apr;46(4):287-98
pubmed: 19570501
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D675-81
pubmed: 22064857
Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Apr;3(2):348-58
pubmed: 15075265
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 28;7:12766
pubmed: 27677328
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10352-10357
pubmed: 16801547
Genes Dev. 1989 Apr;3(4):559-71
pubmed: 2524423
Eukaryot Cell. 2008 Sep;7(9):1549-64
pubmed: 18676954
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 21;91(13):6226-30
pubmed: 8016143
mBio. 2019 Mar 26;10(2):
pubmed: 30914505
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(1):20-40
pubmed: 27193559
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Jun 06;9(7):509-18
pubmed: 21643041
Adv Appl Microbiol. 2017;100:161-202
pubmed: 28732553
Cell Res. 2002 Mar;12(1):9-18
pubmed: 11942415
Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Oct;6(10):1701-14
pubmed: 17715363
Genetics. 2005 Jul;170(3):1091-104
pubmed: 15802524
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011 Mar;75(1):50-83
pubmed: 21372320
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;638:33-40
pubmed: 20238259
Mol Cell. 2011 Dec 9;44(5):687-97
pubmed: 22152473
Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):859-68
pubmed: 12712197
Plant Cell. 2012 Apr;24(4):1327-51
pubmed: 22517321
Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1313-25
pubmed: 18562669
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 01;10:2317
pubmed: 31736884
Eukaryot Cell. 2008 Dec;7(12):2113-22
pubmed: 18849472
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Feb 19;4(2):349-65
pubmed: 24347630

Auteurs

Alexander J Carrillo (AJ)

Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Ilva E Cabrera (IE)

Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Marko J Spasojevic (MJ)

Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, California, 92521, USA.

Patrick Schacht (P)

Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Jason E Stajich (JE)

Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Katherine A Borkovich (KA)

Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. Katherine.Borkovich@ucr.edu.

Articles similaires

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Animals Natural Killer T-Cells Mice Adipose Tissue Lipid Metabolism
Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol
Animals Lung India Sheep Transcriptome

Classifications MeSH