Diagnosing colorectal cancer in primary care: cohort study in Sweden of qualitative faecal immunochemical tests, haemoglobin levels, and platelet counts.
anaemia
colorectal neoplasms
general practice
occult blood
thrombocytosis
Journal
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN: 1478-5242
Titre abrégé: Br J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005323
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
02
12
2020
accepted:
13
05
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics are challenging in primary care and reliable diagnostic aids are desired. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have been used for suspected CRC in Sweden since the mid-2000s, but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce. Anaemia and thrombocytosis are both associated with CRC. To evaluate the usefulness of qualitative FITs requested for symptomatic patients in primary care, alone and combined with findings of anaemia and thrombocytosis, in the diagnosis of CRC. A population-based cohort study using electronic health records and data from the Swedish Cancer Register, covering five Swedish regions. Patients aged ≥18 years in the five regions who had provided FITs requested by primary care practitioners from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were identified. FIT and blood-count data were registered and all CRC diagnoses made within 2 years were retrieved. Diagnostic measurements were calculated. In total, 15 789 patients provided FITs (four different brands); of these patients, 304 were later diagnosed with CRC. Haemoglobin levels were available for 13 863 patients, and platelet counts for 10 973 patients. Calculated for the different FIT brands only, the sensitivities for CRC were 81.6%-100%; specificities 65.7%-79.5%; positive predictive values 4.7%-8.1%; and negative predictive values 99.5%-100%. Calculated for the finding of either a positive FIT or anaemia, the sensitivities increased to 88.9-100%. Adding thrombocytosis did not further increase the diagnostic performance. Qualitative FITs requested in primary care seem to be useful as rule-in tests for referral when CRC is suspected. A negative FIT and no anaemia indicate a low risk of CRC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics are challenging in primary care and reliable diagnostic aids are desired. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have been used for suspected CRC in Sweden since the mid-2000s, but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce. Anaemia and thrombocytosis are both associated with CRC.
AIM
To evaluate the usefulness of qualitative FITs requested for symptomatic patients in primary care, alone and combined with findings of anaemia and thrombocytosis, in the diagnosis of CRC.
DESIGN AND SETTING
A population-based cohort study using electronic health records and data from the Swedish Cancer Register, covering five Swedish regions.
METHOD
Patients aged ≥18 years in the five regions who had provided FITs requested by primary care practitioners from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were identified. FIT and blood-count data were registered and all CRC diagnoses made within 2 years were retrieved. Diagnostic measurements were calculated.
RESULTS
In total, 15 789 patients provided FITs (four different brands); of these patients, 304 were later diagnosed with CRC. Haemoglobin levels were available for 13 863 patients, and platelet counts for 10 973 patients. Calculated for the different FIT brands only, the sensitivities for CRC were 81.6%-100%; specificities 65.7%-79.5%; positive predictive values 4.7%-8.1%; and negative predictive values 99.5%-100%. Calculated for the finding of either a positive FIT or anaemia, the sensitivities increased to 88.9-100%. Adding thrombocytosis did not further increase the diagnostic performance.
CONCLUSION
Qualitative FITs requested in primary care seem to be useful as rule-in tests for referral when CRC is suspected. A negative FIT and no anaemia indicate a low risk of CRC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33139332
pii: bjgp20X713465
doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713465
pmc: PMC7643823
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hemoglobins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e843-e851Informations de copyright
©The Authors.
Références
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Mar;15(3):e151-9
pubmed: 23199241
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):162-9
pubmed: 19189905
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(2):354-363
pubmed: 27910113
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27-33
pubmed: 18767000
BJS Open. 2019 Jan 28;3(3):395-402
pubmed: 31183456
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;53(12):1526-1534
pubmed: 30621475
BMC Med. 2009 Apr 17;7:17
pubmed: 19374736
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(4):471-479
pubmed: 30065255
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Apr;54(4):595-602
pubmed: 26457785
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 29;98(2):323-7
pubmed: 18219289
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec;31(4):209-14
pubmed: 24191847
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):155
pubmed: 30359225
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 May 30;11:65
pubmed: 21624112
Gut. 2016 Sep;65(9):1463-9
pubmed: 26294695
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;52(1):69-75
pubmed: 27623716
Clin Chem. 2012 Jun;58(6):989-98
pubmed: 22407858
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 21;25(19):2383-2401
pubmed: 31148909
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jun;9(5):443-51
pubmed: 17504342
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2019 May 4;6(1):e000293
pubmed: 31275586
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Dec;35(4):369-372
pubmed: 29183266
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Sep;47(9):797-804
pubmed: 26055489
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):4-10
pubmed: 27681942
Endoscopy. 2017 Aug;49(8):745-753
pubmed: 28445903
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;34(3):401-408
pubmed: 30515556
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jun;67(659):e405-e413
pubmed: 28533199
Fam Pract. 2018 Dec 12;35(6):671-675
pubmed: 29659802
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):93-104
pubmed: 28958859