Development and psychometric properties of Midwives' Knowledge and Practice Scale on Respectful Maternity Care (MKP-RMC).
Adult
Delivery, Obstetric
/ psychology
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Iran
Labor, Obstetric
/ psychology
Maternal Health Services
Middle Aged
Midwifery
/ methods
Parturition
/ psychology
Perinatal Care
/ methods
Pilot Projects
Pregnancy
Psychometrics
/ methods
Qualitative Research
Quality of Health Care
Respect
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
15
06
2020
accepted:
09
10
2020
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To develop a scale for evaluating knowledge and practice of midwives on Respectful Maternity Care (RMC). An exploratory sequential mixed method study was conducted from January 2018 to July 2019 in two non-teaching public hospitals in Tehran, Iran. In the first part of the study, a literature review and qualitative study were carried out in order to develop the preliminary item pool. Then face, content and construct validity and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) were assessed. The MKP-RMC scale has 23-item in knowledge and 23-item in practice section that loaded in three factors: Giving emotional support, providing safe care and preventing mistreatment. Exploratory factor analysis accounted for 43.47% and 58.62% of observed variance in knowledge and practice sections, respectively. The internal consistency and internal correlation coefficient of both section of MKP-RMC indicated acceptable reliability. The MKP-RMC is a valid and reliable tool for measuring midwives' knowledge and practice of respectful care during labor and childbirth. The MKP-RMC could be used in maternity services to evaluate and improve quality of childbirth care through development of educational interventions for effective behavioral change. Confirmation of validity and reliability of translated version of the scale in other maternity care providers and different contexts is recommended.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33141835
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241219
pii: PONE-D-20-12308
pmc: PMC7608882
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0241219Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71
pubmed: 25238684
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229941
pubmed: 32150593
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 06;16(1):138
pubmed: 27267923
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):932-942
pubmed: 29117644
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Mar;25(3):434-41
pubmed: 9080267
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD003766
pubmed: 28681500
Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):157-167
pubmed: 30093349
Aust Coll Midwives Inc J. 1997 Jun;10(2):23-8
pubmed: 9313447
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):102
pubmed: 28351350
Health Care Women Int. 2014 Feb;35(2):127-48
pubmed: 24351089
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):671-4
pubmed: 26628382
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 19;3:201-210
pubmed: 29349217
Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1215-25
pubmed: 24965819
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 29;16:67
pubmed: 27026164
Women Birth. 2017 Aug;30(4):298-307
pubmed: 27955951
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Dec;25(4):806-17
pubmed: 21480938
Midwifery. 2020 Jan;80:102573
pubmed: 31734587
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 24;9:37
pubmed: 19239704
Reprod Health. 2017 Aug 22;14(1):99
pubmed: 28830492
Reprod Health. 2012 Nov 16;9:30
pubmed: 23158672
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1692-1693
pubmed: 31604661