Study protocol: Whole genome sequencing Implementation in standard Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE).
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Clinical Decision-Making
DNA, Neoplasm
/ genetics
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
/ economics
Neoplasms
/ chemistry
Observational Studies as Topic
Patient Selection
Precision Medicine
/ methods
Research Design
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Standard of Care
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
Whole Genome Sequencing
/ economics
Workflow
Biomarker
Cancer
Diagnostics
Personalized medicine
Whole genome sequencing
Journal
BMC medical genomics
ISSN: 1755-8794
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101319628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 11 2020
10 11 2020
Historique:
received:
08
10
2020
accepted:
25
10
2020
entrez:
10
11
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
6
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
'Precision oncology' can ensure the best suitable treatment at the right time by tailoring treatment towards individual patient and comprehensive tumour characteristics. In current molecular pathology, diagnostic tests which are part of the standard of care (SOC) only cover a limited part of the spectrum of genomic changes, and often are performed in an iterative way. This occurs at the expense of valuable patient time, available tissue sample, and interferes with 'first time right' treatment decisions. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) captures a near complete view of genomic characteristics of a tumour in a single test. Moreover, WGS facilitates faster implementation of new treatment relevant biomarkers. At present, WGS mainly has been applied in study settings, but its performance in a routine diagnostic setting remains to be evaluated. The WIDE study aims to investigate the feasibility and validity of WGS-based diagnostics in clinical practice. 1200 consecutive patients in a single comprehensive cancer centre with (suspicion of) a metastasized solid tumour will be enrolled with the intention to analyse tumour tissue with WGS, in parallel to SOC diagnostics. Primary endpoints are (1) feasibility of implementation of WGS-based diagnostics into routine clinical care and (2) clinical validation of WGS by comparing identification of treatment-relevant variants between WGS and SOC molecular diagnostics. Secondary endpoints entail (1) added clinical value in terms of additional treatment options and (2) cost-effectiveness of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics through a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) analysis. Furthermore, the (3) perceived impact of WGS-based diagnostics on clinical decision making will be evaluated through questionnaires. The number of patients included in (experimental) therapies initiated based on SOC or WGS diagnostics will be reported with at least 3 months follow-up. The clinical efficacy is beyond the scope of WIDE. Key performance indicators will be evaluated after every 200 patients enrolled, and procedures optimized accordingly, to continuously improve the diagnostic performance of WGS in a routine clinical setting. WIDE will yield the optimal conditions under which WGS can be implemented in a routine molecular diagnostics setting and establish the position of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics in routine clinical care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
'Precision oncology' can ensure the best suitable treatment at the right time by tailoring treatment towards individual patient and comprehensive tumour characteristics. In current molecular pathology, diagnostic tests which are part of the standard of care (SOC) only cover a limited part of the spectrum of genomic changes, and often are performed in an iterative way. This occurs at the expense of valuable patient time, available tissue sample, and interferes with 'first time right' treatment decisions. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) captures a near complete view of genomic characteristics of a tumour in a single test. Moreover, WGS facilitates faster implementation of new treatment relevant biomarkers. At present, WGS mainly has been applied in study settings, but its performance in a routine diagnostic setting remains to be evaluated. The WIDE study aims to investigate the feasibility and validity of WGS-based diagnostics in clinical practice.
METHODS
1200 consecutive patients in a single comprehensive cancer centre with (suspicion of) a metastasized solid tumour will be enrolled with the intention to analyse tumour tissue with WGS, in parallel to SOC diagnostics. Primary endpoints are (1) feasibility of implementation of WGS-based diagnostics into routine clinical care and (2) clinical validation of WGS by comparing identification of treatment-relevant variants between WGS and SOC molecular diagnostics. Secondary endpoints entail (1) added clinical value in terms of additional treatment options and (2) cost-effectiveness of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics through a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) analysis. Furthermore, the (3) perceived impact of WGS-based diagnostics on clinical decision making will be evaluated through questionnaires. The number of patients included in (experimental) therapies initiated based on SOC or WGS diagnostics will be reported with at least 3 months follow-up. The clinical efficacy is beyond the scope of WIDE. Key performance indicators will be evaluated after every 200 patients enrolled, and procedures optimized accordingly, to continuously improve the diagnostic performance of WGS in a routine clinical setting.
DISCUSSION
WIDE will yield the optimal conditions under which WGS can be implemented in a routine molecular diagnostics setting and establish the position of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics in routine clinical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33167975
doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-00814-w
pii: 10.1186/s12920-020-00814-w
pmc: PMC7654005
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
DNA, Neoplasm
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
169Subventions
Organisme : ZonMw
ID : 446002004
Pays : Netherlands
Références
Br J Haematol. 2018 Aug;182(3):412-417
pubmed: 29808933
ESMO Open. 2016 Nov 18;1(5):e000094
pubmed: 27933214
Cell Oncol. 2007;29(1):19-24
pubmed: 17429138
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 27;9(1):3962
pubmed: 30262806
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):210-216
pubmed: 31645765
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 19;10(1):3240
pubmed: 31324872
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7776):127-131
pubmed: 31570881