What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata.
breast cancer disparities
breast cancer surgery
conversation aids
decision support techniques
lower educational attainment
lower health literacy
lower socioeconomic status
pictorial superiority
Journal
Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2021
01 02 2021
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
revised:
02
08
2020
accepted:
18
08
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
10
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early-stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. We conducted a 3-arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon-level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence-based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre-consultation) to T5 (1-year after surgery. Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self-reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. Paper-based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text-only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early-stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices.
METHODS
We conducted a 3-arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon-level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence-based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre-consultation) to T5 (1-year after surgery.
RESULTS
Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self-reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS
Paper-based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients.
LAY SUMMARY
The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text-only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33170506
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33248
pmc: PMC7983934
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03136367']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
422-436Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA023108
Pays : United States
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : 1511-32875
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Références
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Dec 1;63(23):2391-7
pubmed: 17106013
Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1988-99
pubmed: 12404294
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1473-9
pubmed: 11896094
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):119-30, vii
pubmed: 15542003
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1351-9
pubmed: 18927048
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):158-65
pubmed: 16870385
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 02;6(2):e010008
pubmed: 26839014
Cancer. 2008 Mar 1;112(5):1153-61
pubmed: 18189306
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e311-21
pubmed: 21543184
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):1-10
pubmed: 22056355
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 03;16(1):e2
pubmed: 24389354
Oncologist. 2013;18(9):986-93
pubmed: 23939284
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):219-22
pubmed: 24002635
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Apr 3;94(7):490-6
pubmed: 11929949
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):209-17
pubmed: 22541508
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):175-9
pubmed: 25318648
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 21;16(1):147
pubmed: 27871271
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1935-1960
pubmed: 32466864
Med Inform Internet Med. 2007 Dec;32(4):263-86
pubmed: 18072004
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):571-577
pubmed: 26566194
Am J Med. 2011 Jun;124(6):549-56
pubmed: 21605732
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Mar 27;15:e008
pubmed: 26034467
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S14
pubmed: 24625083
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431
pubmed: 24470076
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 28;167(10):1076-82
pubmed: 17533211
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):241
pubmed: 29439691
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 20;25(9):1067-73
pubmed: 17369570
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
pubmed: 18335281
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jun 08;12:51
pubmed: 22681763
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23
pubmed: 16760238
Med Decis Making. 2016 May;36(4):557-61
pubmed: 26721257
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670
pubmed: 24736389
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Nov 25;3(2):2381468318811839
pubmed: 30515461
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Mar;22(3):236-42
pubmed: 23428286
Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;3(3):264-70
pubmed: 8673784
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Dec;38(6):506-14
pubmed: 27440100
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):519-25
pubmed: 19114703
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):251-9
pubmed: 22496116
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):817-841
pubmed: 30612829
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92
pubmed: 12926578
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):35-44
pubmed: 19692709
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e023300
pubmed: 30104319
Psychooncology. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):137-46
pubmed: 11268140
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1560-8
pubmed: 19786674
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):355-60
pubmed: 16860520
J Health Psychol. 2013 Aug;18(8):1011-22
pubmed: 23676466
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):303-12
pubmed: 16860523
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020 Jan 27;7(1):8-18
pubmed: 32002443
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):422-436
pubmed: 33170506
JAMA. 1997 May 14;277(18):1485-92
pubmed: 9145723
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 18;17(1):124
pubmed: 28821256
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738
pubmed: 30487232
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):179-88
pubmed: 21571485
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42
pubmed: 24669751
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 22;9:26
pubmed: 24559190
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):173-90
pubmed: 16122896
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S10
pubmed: 24624970
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7
pubmed: 23768763
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):387-95
pubmed: 17156967
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83
pubmed: 21697139
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):207-12
pubmed: 22854227
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202
pubmed: 9611617
J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(3):251-60
pubmed: 1419592
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):236-42
pubmed: 26324111
Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):634-42
pubmed: 17531504
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Sep 15;14:81
pubmed: 26369339
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):138-40
pubmed: 19959322
Breast J. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):2-5
pubmed: 14717752
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):970-6
pubmed: 25956069
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31
pubmed: 24328648