Preferential meiotic chromosome pairing among homologous chromosomes with cryptic sequence variation in tetraploid maize.
allopolyploid
autopolyploid
chromosome painting
homoeologous pairing
homologous pairing
maize
Journal
The New phytologist
ISSN: 1469-8137
Titre abrégé: New Phytol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9882884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
06
09
2020
accepted:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
23
11
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
22
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Meiotic chromosome pairing between homoeologous chromosomes was reported in many nascent allopolyploids. Homoeologous pairing is gradually eliminated and replaced by exclusive homologous pairing in well-established allopolyploids, an evolutionary process referred to as the diploidization of allopolyploids. A fundamental question of the diploidization of allopolyploids is whether and to what extent the DNA sequence variation among homoeologous chromosomes contribute to the establishment of exclusive homologous chromosome pairing. We developed aneuploid tetraploid maize lines that contain three copies of chromosome 10 derived from inbred lines B73 and H99. We were able to identify the parental origin of each copy of chromosome 10 in the materials using oligonucleotide-based haplotype-specific chromosome painting. We demonstrate that the two identical copies of chromosome 10 from H99 pair preferentially over chromosome 10 from B73 in different stages of prophase I and metaphase I during meiosis. Thus, homologous chromosome pairing is favored to partners with the most similar DNA sequences and can be discriminated based on cryptic sequence variation. We propose that innate preference of homologous chromosome pairing exists in nascent allopolyploids and serves as the first layer that would eventually block all homoeologous chromosome pairing in allopolyploids.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3294-3302Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Foundation.
Références
Adams KL, Wendel JF. 2005. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135-141.
Armstrong KC. 1971. Chromosome associations at pachytene and metaphase in Medicago sativa. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 13: 697-702.
Benavente E, Orellana J. 1991. Chromosome differentiation and pairing behavior of polyploids - an assessment on preferential metaphase-I associations in colchicine-induced autotetraploid hybrids within the genus Secale. Genetics 128: 433-442.
Birchler JA, Gao Z, Han FP. 2009. Pairing in plants: import is important. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 19751-19752.
Blackwell AR, Dluzewska J, Szymanska-Lejman M, Desjardins S, Tock AJ, Kbiri N, Lambing C, Lawrence EJ, Bieluszewski T, Rowan B et al. 2020. MSH2 shapes the meiotic crossover landscape in relation to interhomolog polymorphism in Arabidopsis. EMBO Journal 39: e104858.
Bozza CG, Pawlowski WP. 2008. The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 120: 313-319.
Braz GT, Martins LD, Zhang T, Albert PS, Birchler JA, Jiang JM. 2020a. A universal chromosome identification system for maize and wild Zea species. Chromosome Research 28: 183-194.
Braz GT, Yu F, Do Vale Martins L, Jiang J. 2020b. Fluorescent in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide-based probes. In: Nielsen BS, Jones J, eds. In situ hybridization protocols. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 71-83.
Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one Fastq preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34: i884-i890.
Cheng ZK, Buell CR, Wing RA, Jiang JM. 2002. Resolution of fluorescence in-situ hybridization mapping on rice mitotic prometaphase chromosomes, meiotic pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibers. Chromosome Research 10: 379-387.
Chester M, Gallagher JP, Symonds VV, da Silva AVC, Mavrodiev EV, Leitch AR, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2012 Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 1176-1181.
Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 836-846.
Dell'Acqua M, Gatti DM, Pea G, Cattonaro F, Coppens F, Magris G, Hlaing AL, Aung HH, Nelissen H, Baute J et al. 2015. Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: a new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biology 16: 167.
Doyle GG. 1979. The allotetraploidization of maize. 1. The physical basis - differential pairing affinity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 54: 103-112.
Doyle GG. 1986. The allotetraploidization of maize 4. Cytological and genetic evidence indicative of substantial progress. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71: 585-594.
Dvorak J, Mcguire PE. 1981. Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species. Genetics 97: 391-414.
Feldman M, Liu B, Segal G, Abbo S, Levy AA, Vega JM. 1997. Rapid elimination of low-copy DNA sequences in polyploid wheat: a possible mechanism for differentiation of homoeologous chromosomes. Genetics 147: 1381-1387.
Gaeta RT, Pires JC. 2010. Homoeologous recombination in allopolyploids: the polyploid ratchet. New Phytologist 186: 18-28.
Gill BS, Chen PD. 1987. Role of cytoplasm-specific introgression in the evolution of the polyploid wheats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 84: 6800-6804.
Gong ZY, Liu XX, Tang D, Yu HX, Yi CD, Cheng ZK, Gu MH. 2011. Non-homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in haploid rice meiosis. Chromosoma 120: 47-60.
Guo H, Wang XY, Gundlach H, Mayer KFX, Peterson DG, Scheffler BE, Chee PW, Paterson AH. 2014. Extensive and biased intergenomic nonreciprocal DNA exchanges shaped a nascent polyploid genome, Gossypium (cotton). Genetics 197: 1153-1163.
Han YH, Zhang T, Thammapichai P, Weng YQ, Jiang JM. 2015. Chromosome-specific painting in Cucumis species using bulked oligonucleotides. Genetics 200: 771-779.
He L, Braz GT, Torres GA, Jiang JM. 2018. Chromosome painting in meiosis reveals pairing of specific chromosomes in polyploid Solanum species. Chromosoma 127: 505-513.
Jackson RC, Hauber DP. 1982. Autotriploid and autotetraploid cytogenetic analyses - correction coefficients for proposed binomial models. American Journal of Botany 69: 644-646.
Jauhar PP, Dogramaci M, Peterson TS. 2004. Synthesis and cytological characterization of trigeneric hybrids of durum wheat with and without Ph1. Genome 47: 1173-1181.
Jenczewski E, Alix K. 2004. From diploids to allopolyploids: the emergence of efficient pairing control genes in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 21-45.
Jiao YP, Peluso P, Shi JH, Liang T, Stitzer MC, Wang B, Campbell MS, Stein JC, Wei XH, Chin CS et al. 2017. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 546: 524-527.
Kato A. 1999. Air drying method using nitrous oxide for chromosome counting in maize. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 74: 160-166.
Kato A, Birchler JA. 2006. Induction of tetraploid derivatives of maize inbred lines by nitrous oxide gas treatment. Journal of Heredity 97: 39-44.
Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with Bwa-Mem. http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997.
Li LL, Jean M, Belzile F. 2006. The impact of sequence divergence and DNA mismatch repair on homeologous recombination in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 45: 908-916.
Liu B, Wendel JF. 2003. Epigenetic phenomena and the evolution of plant allopolyploids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 365-379.
Lloyd A, Bomblies K. 2016. Meiosis in autopolyploid and allopolyploid Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 30: 116-122.
Lukens LN, Pires JC, Leon E, Vogelzang R, Oslach L, Osborn T. 2006. Patterns of sequence loss and cytosine methylation within a population of newly resynthesized Brassica napus allopolyploids. Plant Physiology 140: 336-348.
Maestra B, Naranjo T. 1998. Homoeologous relationships of Aegilops speltoides chromosomes to bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 181-186.
Martins LD, Yu F, Zhao HN, Dennison T, Lauter N, Wang HY, Deng ZH, Thompson A, Semrau K, Rouillard JM et al. 2019. Meiotic crossovers characterized by haplotype-specific chromosome painting in maize. Nature Communications 10: 4604.
McClintock B. 1933. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis in Zea mays. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 19: 191-237.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research 20: 1297-1303.
Michel KE, Burnham CR. 1969. The behavior of nonhomologous univalents in double trisomics in maize. Genetics 63: 851-864.
Miller TE, Reader SM, Purdie KA, King IP. 1994. Determination of the frequency of wheat-rye chromosome pairing in wheat × rye hybrids with and without chromosome 5B. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 255-258.
Nelson PT, Coles ND, Holland JB, Bubeck DM, Smith S, Goodman MM. 2008. Molecular characterization of maize inbreds with expired US plant variety protection. Crop Science 48: 1673-1685.
Opperman R, Emmanuel E, Levy AA. 2004. The effect of sequence divergence on recombination between direct repeats in Arabidopsis. Genetics 168: 2207-2215.
Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M. 2001. Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell 13: 1735-1747.
Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841-842.
Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
Ross KJ, Fransz P, Jones GH. 1996. A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Research 4: 507-516.
Santos JL, Alfaro D, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH. 2003. Partial diploidization of meiosis in autotetraploid Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 165: 1533-1540.
Sears ER. 1976. Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annual Review of Genetics 10: 31-51.
Serra H, Choi K, Zhao XH, Blackwell AR, Kim J, Henderson IR. 2018. Interhomolog polymorphism shapes meiotic crossover within the Arabidopsis RAC1 and RPP13 disease resistance genes. PLoS Genetics 14: e1007843.
Soltis PS, Marchant DB, Van de Peer Y, Soltis DE. 2015. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 35: 119-125.
Song KM, Lu P, Tang KL, Osborn TC. 1995. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 7719-7723.
Sved JA. 1966. Telomere attachment of chromosomes. Some genetical and cytological consequences. Genetics 53: 747-756.
Sybenga J. 1975. Meiotic configurations. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Ting YC. 1966. Duplications and meiotic behavior of the chromosomes in haploid maize (Zea mays L.). Cytologia 31: 324-329.
Weiss H, Maluszynska J. 2000. Chromosomal rearrangement in autotetraploid plants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Hereditas 133: 255-261.
Wu JH, Datson PM, Manako KI, Murray BG. 2014. Meiotic chromosome pairing behaviour of natural tetraploids and induced autotetraploids of Actinidia chinensis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127: 549-557.