TERT promoter mutation confers favorable prognosis regardless of 1p/19q status in adult diffuse gliomas with IDH1/2 mutations.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Astrocytoma
/ genetics
Brain Neoplasms
/ genetics
Chromosome Deletion
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19
Female
Glioblastoma
/ genetics
Glioma
/ genetics
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Karnofsky Performance Status
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Mutation
Neoplasm Grading
Neurosurgical Procedures
Oligodendroglioma
/ genetics
Prognosis
Promoter Regions, Genetic
/ genetics
Proportional Hazards Models
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Telomerase
/ genetics
Young Adult
1p/19q codeletion
CDKN2A
Glioma
IDH1/2
TERT
Journal
Acta neuropathologica communications
ISSN: 2051-5960
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 11 2020
23 11 2020
Historique:
received:
03
10
2020
accepted:
11
11
2020
entrez:
24
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
TERT promoter mutations are commonly associated with 1p/19q codeletion in IDH-mutated gliomas. However, whether these mutations have an impact on patient survival independent of 1p/19q codeletion is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of TERT promoter mutations on survival in IDH-mutated glioma cases. Detailed clinical information and molecular status data were collected for a cohort of 560 adult patients with IDH-mutated gliomas. Among these patients, 279 had both TERT promoter mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, while 30 had either TERT promoter mutation (n = 24) or 1p/19q codeletion (n = 6) alone. A univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis for survival using clinical and genetic factors indicated that a Karnofsky performance status score (KPS) of 90 or 100, WHO grade II or III, TERT promoter mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, radiation therapy, and extent of resection (90-100%) were associated with favorable prognosis (p < 0.05). A multivariable Cox regression model revealed that TERT promoter mutation had a significantly favorable prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.421, p = 0.049), while 1p/19q codeletion did not have a significant impact (hazard ratio = 0.648, p = 0.349). Analyses incorporating patient clinical and genetic information were further conducted to identify subgroups showing the favorable prognostic impact of TERT promoter mutation. Among the grade II-III glioma patients with a KPS score of 90 or 100, those with IDH-TERT co-mutation and intact 1p/19q (n = 17) showed significantly longer survival than those with IDH mutation, wild-type TERT, and intact 1p/19q (n = 185) (5-year overall survival, 94% and 77%, respectively; p = 0.032). Our results demonstrate that TERT promoter mutation predicts favorable prognosis independent of 1p/19q codeletion in IDH-mutated gliomas. Combined with its adverse effect on survival among IDH-wild glioma cases, the bivalent prognostic impact of TERT promoter mutation may help further refine the molecular diagnosis and prognostication of diffuse gliomas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33228806
doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01078-2
pii: 10.1186/s40478-020-01078-2
pmc: PMC7685625
doi:
Substances chimiques
IDH2 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.41
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
TERT protein, human
EC 2.7.7.49
Telomerase
EC 2.7.7.49
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
201Références
Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 10;23(2):637-651
pubmed: 29642018
Brain Pathol. 2020 May;30(3):541-553
pubmed: 31733156
Acta Neuropathol. 2013 Aug;126(2):267-76
pubmed: 23764841
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019 Nov 1;78(11):1002-1010
pubmed: 31529048
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Dec 17;21(12):1519-1528
pubmed: 31832685
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Aug 08;4(1):79
pubmed: 27503138
J Neurosurg. 2008 Nov;109(5):817-24
pubmed: 18976070
Oncogene. 2008 Mar 27;27(14):2097-108
pubmed: 17934521
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Mar;139(3):603-608
pubmed: 31996992
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Jan;8(1):196-201
pubmed: 11801559
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017 Mar 7;5(1):18
pubmed: 28270234
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Apr;129(4):585-96
pubmed: 25701198
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2499-508
pubmed: 26061753
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018 Apr;35(2):106-113
pubmed: 29550880
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):153-166
pubmed: 29687258
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;20(1):66-77
pubmed: 29016839
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jun;129(6):867-73
pubmed: 25962792
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jun;133(6):1001-1016
pubmed: 28255664
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Nov;136(5):805-810
pubmed: 30259105
Oncotarget. 2014 Mar 30;5(6):1515-25
pubmed: 24722048
Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 11;111(10):2024-32
pubmed: 25314060
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Apr;135(4):639-642
pubmed: 29497819
Nat Genet. 2015 May;47(5):458-68
pubmed: 25848751
Jpn J Cancer Res. 2002 Mar;93(3):284-90
pubmed: 11927010
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2015 Jan;32(1):22-30
pubmed: 24748374
J Neurosurg. 2009 Aug;111(2):203-10
pubmed: 19267536