Haploidentical related donor compared to HLA-identical donor transplantation for chemosensitive Hodgkin lymphoma patients.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
HLA Antigens
/ immunology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ mortality
Hodgkin Disease
/ immunology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Siblings
Survival Rate
Tissue Donors
/ supply & distribution
Transplantation Conditioning
Transplantation, Haploidentical
/ mortality
Transplantation, Homologous
Young Adult
Haploidentical transplantation
Hodgkin lymphoma
Reduced intensity conditioning regimen
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Nov 2020
24 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
accepted:
30
10
2020
entrez:
25
11
2020
pubmed:
26
11
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor using an unmanipulated graft and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is growing. Haploidentical transplantation with PT-Cy showed a major activity in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), reducing the relapse incidence. The most important predictive factor of survival and toxicity was disease status before transplantation, which was better in patients with well controlled disease. We included 198 HL in complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) before transplantation. Sixty-five patients were transplanted from haploidentical donor and 133 from a HLA identical donor (both sibling and unrelated donors). Survival analysis was defined according to the EBMT criteria. Survival curves were generated by using Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were compared by the log rank test or by the log rank test for trend when appropriated. The PFS, OS, and RI were significantly better in patients in CR compared to PR (55% vs 29% p = 0.001, 74% vs 55% p = 0.03, 27% vs 55% p < 0.001, respectively). The 2-year PFS was significantly better for HAPLO than HLA-id (63% vs 37%, p = 0.03), without difference in OS. The 1-year NRM was not different. The 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was lower in the HAPLO group (24% vs 44%, p = 0.008). Patients in CR receiving haplo HSCT showed higher 2-year PFS and lower 2-year RI than those allografted with HLA-id donor (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001 and 11% vs 34%, p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, donor type and disease status before transplantation were independent predictors of PFS as well as they predict the risk of relapse. Disease status at transplantation and age were independently associated to OS. Nonetheless this is a retrospective study, limiting the wide applicability of results, data from this analysis suggest that HLA mismatch can induce a strong graft versus lymphoma effect leading to an enhanced PFS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor using an unmanipulated graft and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is growing. Haploidentical transplantation with PT-Cy showed a major activity in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), reducing the relapse incidence. The most important predictive factor of survival and toxicity was disease status before transplantation, which was better in patients with well controlled disease.
METHODS
METHODS
We included 198 HL in complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) before transplantation. Sixty-five patients were transplanted from haploidentical donor and 133 from a HLA identical donor (both sibling and unrelated donors). Survival analysis was defined according to the EBMT criteria. Survival curves were generated by using Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were compared by the log rank test or by the log rank test for trend when appropriated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The PFS, OS, and RI were significantly better in patients in CR compared to PR (55% vs 29% p = 0.001, 74% vs 55% p = 0.03, 27% vs 55% p < 0.001, respectively). The 2-year PFS was significantly better for HAPLO than HLA-id (63% vs 37%, p = 0.03), without difference in OS. The 1-year NRM was not different. The 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was lower in the HAPLO group (24% vs 44%, p = 0.008). Patients in CR receiving haplo HSCT showed higher 2-year PFS and lower 2-year RI than those allografted with HLA-id donor (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001 and 11% vs 34%, p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, donor type and disease status before transplantation were independent predictors of PFS as well as they predict the risk of relapse. Disease status at transplantation and age were independently associated to OS.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Nonetheless this is a retrospective study, limiting the wide applicability of results, data from this analysis suggest that HLA mismatch can induce a strong graft versus lymphoma effect leading to an enhanced PFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33234127
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07602-w
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07602-w
pmc: PMC7685618
doi:
Substances chimiques
HLA Antigens
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1140Références
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Feb;49(2):190-4
pubmed: 24185585
Haematologica. 2009 Feb;94(2):230-8
pubmed: 19066328
Blood. 2016 Feb 18;127(7):938-47
pubmed: 26670632
Blood. 2010 May 6;115(18):3671-7
pubmed: 20220116
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3425-3432
pubmed: 28846465
J Pathol. 2010 Jul;221(3):248-63
pubmed: 20527019
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 May;41(9):765-70
pubmed: 18195684
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3141-9
pubmed: 27269951
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;36(10):942-950
pubmed: 29394125
Oncologist. 2015 Mar;20(3):323-8
pubmed: 25669663
Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2251-2257
pubmed: 28007754
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;53(4):400-409
pubmed: 29330405
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jan;50(1):56-61
pubmed: 25310304
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Apr;15(4):432-8
pubmed: 19285630
Haematologica. 2012 Feb;97(2):310-7
pubmed: 21993674
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Oct;51(10):1307-1312
pubmed: 27159177
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 May;52(5):683-688
pubmed: 28092347
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun;14(6):641-50
pubmed: 18489989
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Nov;14(11):1279-87
pubmed: 18940683