Internal Fixation Construct and Defect Size Affect Healing of a Translational Porcine Diaphyseal Tibial Segmental Bone Defect.
Journal
Military medicine
ISSN: 1930-613X
Titre abrégé: Mil Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2984771R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2021
02 11 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
revised:
04
11
2020
accepted:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
12
11
2021
entrez:
26
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Porcine translational models have become the gold-standard translational tool to study the effects of major injury and hemorrhagic shock because of their similarity to the human immunologic response to trauma. Segmental bone defects (SBDs) typically occur in warfighters with associated severe limb trauma. The purpose of this study was to develop a translational porcine diaphyseal SBD model in Yucatan minipigs (YMPs), which could be used in bone healing investigations that simulate injury-relevant conditions. We were specifically working toward developing a critical sized defect (CSD). We used an adaptive experimental design in which both 25.0 mm and 40.0 mm SBDs were created in the tibial mid-diaphysis in skeletally mature YMPs. Initially, eight YMPs were subjected to a 25.0 mm SBD and treated with intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nail [IMN] 25mm). Due to unanticipated wound problems, we subsequently treated four specimens with identical 25.0 mm defect with dual plating (open reduction with internal fixation [ORIF] 25mm). Finally, a third group of four YMPs with 40.0 mm defects were treated with dual plating (ORIF 40mm). Monthly radiographs were made until sacrifice. Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia fractures (mRUST) measurements were made by three trauma-trained orthopedic surgeons. CT scans of the tibias were used to verify the union results. At 4 months post-surgery, mean mRUST scores were 11.7 (SD ± 1.8) in the ORIF 25mm YMPs vs. 8.5 (SD ± 1.4) in the IMN 25mm YMPs (P < .0001). All four ORIF 25mm YMPs were clinically healed. In contrast, none of the IMN 25mm YMPs were clinically healed and seven of eight IMN 25mm YMPs developed delayed wound breakdown. All four of the ORIF 40mm YMPs had flail nonunions with complete hardware failure by 3 months after surgery and were sacrificed early. CT scanning confirmed that none of the IMN 25mm YMPs, none of the ORIF 40mm YMPs, and two of four ORIF 25mm YMPs were healed. A third ORIF 25mm specimen was nearly healed on CT scanning. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability interclass coefficients using the mRUST scale were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. YMPs that had a 40 mm segment of bone removed from their tibia and were treated with dual plating did not heal and could be used to investigate interventions that accelerate bone healing. In contrast, a 25 mm SBD treated with dual plating demonstrated delayed but successful healing, indicating it can potentially be used to investigate bone healing adjuncts or conversely how concomitant injuries may impair bone healing. Pigs treated with IMN failed to heal and developed consistent delayed wound breakdown presumably secondary to chronic limb instability. The porcine YMP SBD model has the potential to be an effective translational tool to investigate bone healing under physiologically relevant injury conditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Porcine translational models have become the gold-standard translational tool to study the effects of major injury and hemorrhagic shock because of their similarity to the human immunologic response to trauma. Segmental bone defects (SBDs) typically occur in warfighters with associated severe limb trauma. The purpose of this study was to develop a translational porcine diaphyseal SBD model in Yucatan minipigs (YMPs), which could be used in bone healing investigations that simulate injury-relevant conditions. We were specifically working toward developing a critical sized defect (CSD).
METHODS
We used an adaptive experimental design in which both 25.0 mm and 40.0 mm SBDs were created in the tibial mid-diaphysis in skeletally mature YMPs. Initially, eight YMPs were subjected to a 25.0 mm SBD and treated with intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nail [IMN] 25mm). Due to unanticipated wound problems, we subsequently treated four specimens with identical 25.0 mm defect with dual plating (open reduction with internal fixation [ORIF] 25mm). Finally, a third group of four YMPs with 40.0 mm defects were treated with dual plating (ORIF 40mm). Monthly radiographs were made until sacrifice. Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia fractures (mRUST) measurements were made by three trauma-trained orthopedic surgeons. CT scans of the tibias were used to verify the union results.
RESULTS
At 4 months post-surgery, mean mRUST scores were 11.7 (SD ± 1.8) in the ORIF 25mm YMPs vs. 8.5 (SD ± 1.4) in the IMN 25mm YMPs (P < .0001). All four ORIF 25mm YMPs were clinically healed. In contrast, none of the IMN 25mm YMPs were clinically healed and seven of eight IMN 25mm YMPs developed delayed wound breakdown. All four of the ORIF 40mm YMPs had flail nonunions with complete hardware failure by 3 months after surgery and were sacrificed early. CT scanning confirmed that none of the IMN 25mm YMPs, none of the ORIF 40mm YMPs, and two of four ORIF 25mm YMPs were healed. A third ORIF 25mm specimen was nearly healed on CT scanning. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability interclass coefficients using the mRUST scale were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
YMPs that had a 40 mm segment of bone removed from their tibia and were treated with dual plating did not heal and could be used to investigate interventions that accelerate bone healing. In contrast, a 25 mm SBD treated with dual plating demonstrated delayed but successful healing, indicating it can potentially be used to investigate bone healing adjuncts or conversely how concomitant injuries may impair bone healing. Pigs treated with IMN failed to heal and developed consistent delayed wound breakdown presumably secondary to chronic limb instability. The porcine YMP SBD model has the potential to be an effective translational tool to investigate bone healing under physiologically relevant injury conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33242094
pii: 6006802
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa516
pmc: PMC8902946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1115-e1123Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 AR072581
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL091816
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T35 HL110854
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002529
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Nov;29(11):516-20
pubmed: 26165265
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Feb 06;10:37
pubmed: 24502522
J Orthop Res. 2010 Mar;28(3):412-8
pubmed: 19725097
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32(2):e76-e80
pubmed: 29240612
J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2637-2645
pubmed: 28401593
J Orthop Res. 2004 May;22(3):544-51
pubmed: 15099633
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Oct;31 Suppl 5:S20-S22
pubmed: 28938386
Biomaterials. 2007 Jan;28(3):459-67
pubmed: 16996588
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):E61-6
pubmed: 19088559
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Aug;50(4):432-6
pubmed: 27480211
J Surg Res. 2015 Mar;194(1):220-32
pubmed: 25481528
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 13;9:435
pubmed: 29593715
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):461e-473e
pubmed: 26397265
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2017 Summer;26(2):86-93
pubmed: 28644119
J Orthop Res. 2017 Jun;35(6):1242-1249
pubmed: 27471833
J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Apr;55(1):28-32
pubmed: 11426394
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Oct;83(4):635-642
pubmed: 28463938
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jan;40(1):48-52
pubmed: 31815862
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):347-352
pubmed: 29635607
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jun;33 Suppl 6:S25-S29
pubmed: 31083145
Mil Med Res. 2019 Apr 24;6(1):11
pubmed: 31014397
Bone. 2009 Nov;45(5):918-24
pubmed: 19665064
J Intern Med. 2019 Jul;286(1):2-15
pubmed: 30623510
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(10):693-701
pubmed: 19858977
Microsurgery. 2019 Feb;39(2):160-166
pubmed: 29504151
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Mar;31(3):127-130
pubmed: 28072652
Shock. 2013 Oct;40(4):247-73
pubmed: 23856921
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S37-S42
pubmed: 29461402
J Orthop Res. 2016 Dec;34(12):2137-2145
pubmed: 27037517
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1310-7
pubmed: 24218163
Stem Cells Int. 2019 Nov 23;2019:6832952
pubmed: 31871469
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 May;33(5):220-228
pubmed: 31008819
Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:126060
pubmed: 25694748
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):600-608
pubmed: 30916730
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2010;23(1):66-70
pubmed: 19997675
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb;42(1):67-75
pubmed: 26038024
J Orthop Res. 2018 Mar;36(3):945-953
pubmed: 28833572
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Jan 10;10(423):
pubmed: 29321260
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1871-1878
pubmed: 30399082
J Orthop Res. 2002 Jan;20(1):142-50
pubmed: 11853081