Prior exposure of Arabidopsis seedlings to mechanical stress heightens jasmonic acid-mediated defense against necrotrophic pathogens.
Alternaria
/ physiology
Arabidopsis
/ genetics
Arabidopsis Proteins
/ genetics
Botrytis
/ physiology
Cyclopentanes
/ metabolism
Disease Resistance
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Models, Genetic
Mutation
Oxylipins
/ metabolism
Plant Diseases
/ genetics
Plant Immunity
/ genetics
Plant Leaves
/ genetics
Salicylic Acid
/ metabolism
Seedlings
/ genetics
Stress, Mechanical
Alternaria brassicicola
Botrytis cinerea
Jasmonic acid
Mechanical stress
Necrotrophic pathogen
Stress priming
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2020
07 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
02
06
2020
accepted:
26
11
2020
entrez:
8
12
2020
pubmed:
9
12
2020
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prolonged mechanical stress (MS) causes thigmomorphogenesis, a stress acclimation response associated with increased disease resistance. What remains unclear is if; 1) plants pre-exposed to a short period of repetitive MS can prime defence responses upon subsequent challenge with necrotrophic pathogens, 2) MS mediates plant immunity via jasmonic acid (JA) signalling, and 3) a short period of repetitive MS can cause long-term changes in gene expression resembling a stress-induced memory. To address these points, 10-days old juvenile Arabidopsis seedlings were mechanically stressed for 7-days using a soft brush and subsequently challenged with the necrotrophic pathogens, Alternaria brassicicola, and Botrytis cinerea. Here we assessed how MS impacted structural cell wall appositions, disease symptoms and altered gene expression in response to infection. The MS-treated plants exhibited enhanced cell wall appositions and jasmonic acid (JA) accumulation that correlated with a reduction in disease progression compared to unstressed plants. The expression of genes involved in JA signalling, callose deposition, peroxidase and phytoalexin biosynthesis and reactive oxygen species detoxification were hyper-induced 4-days post-infection in MS-treated plants. The loss-of-function in JA signalling mediated by the JA-insensitive coronatine-insensitive 1 (coi1) mutant impaired the hyper-induction of defense gene expression and promoted pathogen proliferation in MS-treated plants subject to infection. The basal expression level of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 and PLANT DEFENSIN 1.2 defense marker genes were constitutively upregulated in rosette leaves for 5-days post-MS, as well as in naïve cauline leaves that differentiated from the inflorescence meristem well after ceasing MS. This study reveals that exposure of juvenile Arabidopsis plants to a short repetitive period of MS can alter gene expression and prime plant resistance upon subsequent challenge with necrotrophic pathogens via the JA-mediated COI1 signalling pathway. MS may facilitate a stress-induced memory to modulate the plant's response to future stress encounters. These data advance our understanding of how MS primes plant immunity against necrotrophic pathogens and how that could be utilised in sustainable agricultural practices.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prolonged mechanical stress (MS) causes thigmomorphogenesis, a stress acclimation response associated with increased disease resistance. What remains unclear is if; 1) plants pre-exposed to a short period of repetitive MS can prime defence responses upon subsequent challenge with necrotrophic pathogens, 2) MS mediates plant immunity via jasmonic acid (JA) signalling, and 3) a short period of repetitive MS can cause long-term changes in gene expression resembling a stress-induced memory. To address these points, 10-days old juvenile Arabidopsis seedlings were mechanically stressed for 7-days using a soft brush and subsequently challenged with the necrotrophic pathogens, Alternaria brassicicola, and Botrytis cinerea. Here we assessed how MS impacted structural cell wall appositions, disease symptoms and altered gene expression in response to infection.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The MS-treated plants exhibited enhanced cell wall appositions and jasmonic acid (JA) accumulation that correlated with a reduction in disease progression compared to unstressed plants. The expression of genes involved in JA signalling, callose deposition, peroxidase and phytoalexin biosynthesis and reactive oxygen species detoxification were hyper-induced 4-days post-infection in MS-treated plants. The loss-of-function in JA signalling mediated by the JA-insensitive coronatine-insensitive 1 (coi1) mutant impaired the hyper-induction of defense gene expression and promoted pathogen proliferation in MS-treated plants subject to infection. The basal expression level of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 and PLANT DEFENSIN 1.2 defense marker genes were constitutively upregulated in rosette leaves for 5-days post-MS, as well as in naïve cauline leaves that differentiated from the inflorescence meristem well after ceasing MS.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study reveals that exposure of juvenile Arabidopsis plants to a short repetitive period of MS can alter gene expression and prime plant resistance upon subsequent challenge with necrotrophic pathogens via the JA-mediated COI1 signalling pathway. MS may facilitate a stress-induced memory to modulate the plant's response to future stress encounters. These data advance our understanding of how MS primes plant immunity against necrotrophic pathogens and how that could be utilised in sustainable agricultural practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33287718
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02759-9
pii: 10.1186/s12870-020-02759-9
pmc: PMC7720613
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Cyclopentanes
0
Oxylipins
0
jasmonic acid
6RI5N05OWW
Salicylic Acid
O414PZ4LPZ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
548Références
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Aug;56(8):1472-80
pubmed: 25941234
Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun;132(2):606-17
pubmed: 12805591
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27
pubmed: 16078883
Ann Bot. 2018 Dec 31;122(7):1117-1129
pubmed: 29924303
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Oct 21;5:533
pubmed: 25374573
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16790
pubmed: 29196636
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Aug 14;5:401
pubmed: 25177327
Plant J. 2009 Apr;58(1):69-81
pubmed: 19054360
Oecologia. 2014 May;175(1):63-72
pubmed: 24390479
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):9-15
pubmed: 22037416
Plant J. 2013 Jul;75(2):278-89
pubmed: 23480445
Plant Signal Behav. 2016 Oct 2;11(10):e1226456
pubmed: 27562527
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Oct;10(5):520-7
pubmed: 17709278
Plant Methods. 2011 Nov 18;7:37
pubmed: 22098763
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1043:55-66
pubmed: 23913035
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Sep 13;91(19):8955-9
pubmed: 8090752
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;639:292-8
pubmed: 20387054
Nat Plants. 2015 Feb 09;1:14025
pubmed: 27246879
Plant Physiol. 2015 Dec;169(4):2513-25
pubmed: 26468518
J Exp Bot. 2013 Nov;64(15):4663-80
pubmed: 23913953
Plant Cell. 1995 Oct;7(10):1555-67
pubmed: 7580251
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23345-23356
pubmed: 31662474
New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):373-89
pubmed: 15720650
Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar;161(3):1433-44
pubmed: 23335625
Plant Physiol. 2002 Apr;128(4):1402-9
pubmed: 11950988
Mol Plant. 2013 May;6(3):686-703
pubmed: 23142764
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Mar;42(3):753-761
pubmed: 30779228
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):15107-11
pubmed: 9844023
Planta. 2002 Aug;215(4):549-56
pubmed: 12172836
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 20;113(51):E8335-E8343
pubmed: 27930298
BMC Genomics. 2017 Apr 17;18(1):300
pubmed: 28412928
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jun 18;16:466
pubmed: 26084880
Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2220-36
pubmed: 19717617
Curr Biol. 2012 Apr 24;22(8):701-6
pubmed: 22483939
Plant Cell. 2008 Apr;20(4):824-6
pubmed: 18430804
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 19;20(12):
pubmed: 31248143
Development. 1999 Nov;126(21):4763-70
pubmed: 10518493
Plant J. 2018 Feb;93(4):614-636
pubmed: 29266460
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 7;95(14):8398-403
pubmed: 9653198
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Sep 13;13:133
pubmed: 24033927
J Exp Bot. 2017 Jan 1;68(3):499-511
pubmed: 28204553
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Mar;42(3):983-997
pubmed: 30299553
Genome Biol. 2017 Jun 27;18(1):124
pubmed: 28655328
Plant Signal Behav. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e1212798
pubmed: 27454415
Plant Cell. 1994 May;6(5):751-759
pubmed: 12244256
J Exp Bot. 2017 Mar 1;68(6):1371-1385
pubmed: 28069779
Plant Cell Rep. 2018 Feb;37(2):239-250
pubmed: 29032427
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Apr 28;5:168
pubmed: 24808903
New Phytol. 2016 Oct;212(2):303-5
pubmed: 27641960
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):E5712-E5720
pubmed: 28652324
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Dec;40:106-113
pubmed: 28892802
Plant J. 2007 Apr;50(1):128-39
pubmed: 17397508
Plant J. 2019 Feb;97(4):623-645
pubmed: 30537160
New Phytol. 2016 Oct;212(2):434-43
pubmed: 27364233
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Aug 26;5:417
pubmed: 25206356
Cell. 2010 Nov 12;143(4):606-16
pubmed: 21074051
J Exp Bot. 2017 Mar 1;68(6):1349-1359
pubmed: 28158849
Plant Physiol. 2011 Dec;157(4):2000-12
pubmed: 22007023
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60505
pubmed: 23573263
J Exp Bot. 2010 May;61(9):2403-12
pubmed: 20363866
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(10):2847-56
pubmed: 18540020
Mol Cells. 2011 Jun;31(6):593-601
pubmed: 21688205
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017 Apr 28;68:485-512
pubmed: 28226238
Plant J. 2008 Aug;55(4):555-67
pubmed: 18452590
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 13;8:192
pubmed: 28243250
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 12;5:453
pubmed: 25309553
Plant J. 2017 Sep;91(5):802-815
pubmed: 28622438
Plant Physiol. 2010 Nov;154(3):1403-14
pubmed: 20810545
Trends Genet. 2018 Nov;34(11):856-866
pubmed: 30144941
Eukaryot Cell. 2015 Apr;14(4):335-44
pubmed: 25681268
Plant J. 2017 Dec;92(5):761-773
pubmed: 28906064
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 02;6:38427
pubmed: 27910933
New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):429-44
pubmed: 15720654
Nat Commun. 2014 May 07;5:3767
pubmed: 24806884
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 26;9:251
pubmed: 29535756