Patient Education in Neurosurgery: Part 2 of a Systematic Review.
Health literacy
Informed consent
Neurologic surgery
Neurosurgery
Patient education
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
23
09
2020
revised:
26
11
2020
accepted:
27
11
2020
pubmed:
12
12
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
11
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increasing focus has been placed on patient education to optimize care. In the second part of a 2-part systematic review, we characterize the scope of interventions specifically created to improve neurosurgery patient education, assess the effectiveness of these interventions, and extract features of existing interventions that may be incorporated into future patient education interventions. Our findings may help promote the creation of effective, patient-centered educational interventions. A 2-part systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Titles and abstracts were read and selected for full text review. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for study design, aim, population, interventions, and outcomes. Of 1617 resultant articles, 33 were included. Print materials, electronic materials, models, and interventions using multiple modalities improved patient knowledge, decreased anxiety, and increased satisfaction. Electronic materials were preferred. Interventions using multiple modalities engaging multiple sensory systems were reported most beneficial. Video was rated the most effective medium for reinforcing spoken conversation between neurosurgeons and patients. Three-dimensional models decreased the time required for preoperative patient conversation but could be perceived as emotionally confronting. Virtual reality was preferred to patient models. Electronic interventions using multiple modalities in concert with each other may be most effective. Interventions should incorporate baseline knowledge and health literacy and address patient concerns and needs in a manner that is valid cross-contextually, uses clear communication, and is continuous. These interventions will improve the patient-friendliness of discussions with patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increasing focus has been placed on patient education to optimize care. In the second part of a 2-part systematic review, we characterize the scope of interventions specifically created to improve neurosurgery patient education, assess the effectiveness of these interventions, and extract features of existing interventions that may be incorporated into future patient education interventions. Our findings may help promote the creation of effective, patient-centered educational interventions.
METHODS
A 2-part systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Titles and abstracts were read and selected for full text review. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for study design, aim, population, interventions, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Of 1617 resultant articles, 33 were included. Print materials, electronic materials, models, and interventions using multiple modalities improved patient knowledge, decreased anxiety, and increased satisfaction. Electronic materials were preferred. Interventions using multiple modalities engaging multiple sensory systems were reported most beneficial. Video was rated the most effective medium for reinforcing spoken conversation between neurosurgeons and patients. Three-dimensional models decreased the time required for preoperative patient conversation but could be perceived as emotionally confronting. Virtual reality was preferred to patient models.
CONCLUSIONS
Electronic interventions using multiple modalities in concert with each other may be most effective. Interventions should incorporate baseline knowledge and health literacy and address patient concerns and needs in a manner that is valid cross-contextually, uses clear communication, and is continuous. These interventions will improve the patient-friendliness of discussions with patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33307263
pii: S1878-8750(20)32561-4
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.169
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
190-201.e1Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.