High throughput mathematical modeling and multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for plant tissue culture media formulation: Case study of pear rootstocks.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
accepted:
30
11
2020
entrez:
18
12
2020
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
10
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Simplified prediction of the interactions of plant tissue culture media components is of critical importance to efficient development and optimization of new media. We applied two algorithms, gene expression programming (GEP) and M5' model tree, to predict the effects of media components on in vitro proliferation rate (PR), shoot length (SL), shoot tip necrosis (STN), vitrification (Vitri) and quality index (QI) in pear rootstocks (Pyrodwarf and OHF 69). In order to optimize the selected prediction models, as well as achieving a precise multi-optimization method, multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithms using genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) techniques were compared to the mono-objective GA optimization technique. A Gamma test (GT) was used to find the most important determinant input for optimizing each output factor. GEP had a higher prediction accuracy than M5' model tree. GT results showed that BA (Γ = 4.0178), Mesos (Γ = 0.5482), Mesos (Γ = 184.0100), Micros (Γ = 136.6100) and Mesos (Γ = 1.1146), for PR, SL, STN, Vitri and QI respectively, were the most important factors in culturing OHF 69, while for Pyrodwarf culture, BA (Γ = 10.2920), Micros (Γ = 0.7874), NH4NO3 (Γ = 166.410), KNO3 (Γ = 168.4400), and Mesos (Γ = 1.4860) were the most important influences on PR, SL, STN, Vitri and QI respectively. The PSO optimized GEP models produced the best outputs for both rootstocks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33338074
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243940
pii: PONE-D-20-22996
pmc: PMC7748151
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0243940Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Talanta. 2008 Sep 15;76(5):965-77
pubmed: 18761143
Chemosphere. 2019 Jul;227:256-268
pubmed: 30991200
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9977
pubmed: 29967468
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 May;36:112-122
pubmed: 28069190
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e85989
pubmed: 24465829
J Plant Physiol. 2010 Jan 1;167(1):23-7
pubmed: 19716625
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(11):10941-10950
pubmed: 30783934
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 29;7:274
pubmed: 27066013
Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 18;15:136
pubmed: 31832078
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 01;8:1853
pubmed: 29163583
Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Jan 30;92(1):604-11
pubmed: 23218342
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;103(8):3393-3406
pubmed: 30868206
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 21;9(1):2450
pubmed: 30792423
Biol Res. 2014 Dec 16;47:71
pubmed: 25723734
Analyst. 2019 Jun 7;144(11):3525-3532
pubmed: 31020954
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 19;7:1526
pubmed: 27807436
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 19;9:837
pubmed: 29971086
J Plant Physiol. 2011 Oct 15;168(15):1858-65
pubmed: 21676490
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Mar 31;6:225
pubmed: 25873926