Surgical site infections after distal radius fracture surgery: a nation-wide cohort study of 31,807 adult patients.
Antibiotics
Complications
Distal radius fracture
External fixation
Infection after fracture fixation
Percutaneous pinning
Pin fixation
Plate fixation
Postoperative infection
Surgical site infection
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Dec 2020
18 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2020
accepted:
23
11
2020
entrez:
19
12
2020
pubmed:
20
12
2020
medline:
29
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surgical site infections (SSI) after distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery have not previously been studied as the primary outcome in a large population with comparative data for different surgical methods. The aims of this study were 1) to compare SSI rates between plate fixation, percutaneous pinning and external fixation, and 2) to study factors associated with SSI. We performed a nation-wide cohort study linking data from the Swedish national patient register (NPR) with the Swedish prescribed drug register (SPDR). We included all patients ≥18 years with a registration of a surgically treated DRF in the NPR between 2006 and 2013. The primary outcome was a registration in the SPDR of a dispensed prescription of peroral Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin within the first 8 weeks following surgery, which was used as a proxy for an SSI. The SSI rates for the three main surgical methods were calculated. Logistic regression was used to study the association between surgical method and the primary outcome, adjusted for potential confounders including age, sex, fracture type (closed/open), and a dispensed prescription of Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin 0-8 weeks prior to DRF surgery. A classification tree analysis was performed to study which factors were associated with SSI. A total of 31,807 patients with a surgically treated DRF were included. The proportion of patients with an SSI was 5% (n = 1110/21,348) among patients treated with plate fixation, 12% (n = 754/6198) among patients treated with percutaneous pinning, and 28% (n = 1180/4261) among patients treated with external fixation. After adjustment for potential confounders, the surgical method most strongly associated with SSI was external fixation (aOR 6.9 (95% CI 6.2-7.5, p < 0.001)), followed by percutaneous pinning (aOR 2.7 (95% CI 2.4-3.0, p < 0.001)) (reference: plate fixation). The classification tree analysis showed that surgical method, fracture type (closed/open), age and sex were factors associated with SSI. The SSI rate was highest after external fixation and lowest after plate fixation. The results may be useful for estimation of SSI burdens after DRF surgery on a population basis. For the physician, they may be useful for estimating the likelihood of SSI in individual patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Surgical site infections (SSI) after distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery have not previously been studied as the primary outcome in a large population with comparative data for different surgical methods. The aims of this study were 1) to compare SSI rates between plate fixation, percutaneous pinning and external fixation, and 2) to study factors associated with SSI.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a nation-wide cohort study linking data from the Swedish national patient register (NPR) with the Swedish prescribed drug register (SPDR). We included all patients ≥18 years with a registration of a surgically treated DRF in the NPR between 2006 and 2013. The primary outcome was a registration in the SPDR of a dispensed prescription of peroral Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin within the first 8 weeks following surgery, which was used as a proxy for an SSI. The SSI rates for the three main surgical methods were calculated. Logistic regression was used to study the association between surgical method and the primary outcome, adjusted for potential confounders including age, sex, fracture type (closed/open), and a dispensed prescription of Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin 0-8 weeks prior to DRF surgery. A classification tree analysis was performed to study which factors were associated with SSI.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 31,807 patients with a surgically treated DRF were included. The proportion of patients with an SSI was 5% (n = 1110/21,348) among patients treated with plate fixation, 12% (n = 754/6198) among patients treated with percutaneous pinning, and 28% (n = 1180/4261) among patients treated with external fixation. After adjustment for potential confounders, the surgical method most strongly associated with SSI was external fixation (aOR 6.9 (95% CI 6.2-7.5, p < 0.001)), followed by percutaneous pinning (aOR 2.7 (95% CI 2.4-3.0, p < 0.001)) (reference: plate fixation). The classification tree analysis showed that surgical method, fracture type (closed/open), age and sex were factors associated with SSI.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The SSI rate was highest after external fixation and lowest after plate fixation. The results may be useful for estimation of SSI burdens after DRF surgery on a population basis. For the physician, they may be useful for estimating the likelihood of SSI in individual patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33339519
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03822-0
pii: 10.1186/s12891-020-03822-0
pmc: PMC7749509
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
845Subventions
Organisme : Stockholms Läns Landsting
ID : 20140095
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):3017-27
pubmed: 25981715
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Apr;30(4):217-24
pubmed: 26709818
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul-Aug;11(4):642-645
pubmed: 32684703
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Aug;38(8):1469-76
pubmed: 23890493
Acta Orthop. 2011 Feb;82(1):76-81
pubmed: 21281262
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 2;95(19):1737-44
pubmed: 24088965
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2:CD006080
pubmed: 32032439
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;6(4):220-6
pubmed: 26566333
Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):292-6
pubmed: 23594225
Unfallchirurgie. 1986 Oct;12(5):241-6
pubmed: 3798588
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Nov;41(9):990-994
pubmed: 27464583
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96
pubmed: 10196487
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214362
pubmed: 30921377
Injury. 2006 May;37 Suppl 2:S59-66
pubmed: 16651073
J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):939-42; discussion 942-3
pubmed: 21986738
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Nov;30(6):1185-99
pubmed: 16344176
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;145(6):1054e-1066e
pubmed: 32195857
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(17):1-124, v-vi
pubmed: 25716883
Hand Clin. 2015 May;31(2):205-15
pubmed: 25934197
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1214-21
pubmed: 18757963
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):159-167
pubmed: 30589789
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187053
pubmed: 30657531
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):963-9
pubmed: 24986952
Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):491-496
pubmed: 29433799
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29(2):e36-42
pubmed: 25050752
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Nov;43(9):954-960
pubmed: 29228851
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):764-773
pubmed: 29147057
Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):511-522
pubmed: 27639601
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):534-539
pubmed: 29388485
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Apr;70(2):116-8
pubmed: 10366908
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 8;21(1):88
pubmed: 32035488
J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Aug;29(4):374-6
pubmed: 15234503