Blood Glucose Levels Combined with Triage Revised Trauma Score Improve the Outcome Prediction in Adults and in Elderly Patients with Trauma.


Journal

Prehospital and disaster medicine
ISSN: 1945-1938
Titre abrégé: Prehosp Disaster Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8918173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 22 12 2020
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 21 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study was aimed to assess if combining the evaluation of blood glucose level (BGL) and the Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS) may result in a more accurate prediction of the actual clinical outcome, both in general adult population and in elderly patients with trauma. This is a retrospective cohort study, conducted in the emergency department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, with an average ED admission rate of 75,000 patients per year. Those excluded: known diagnosis of diabetes, age <18 years old, pregnancy, and mild trauma (classified as isolate trauma of upper or lower limb, in absence of exposed fractures). A combined Revised Trauma Score Glucose (RTS-G) score was obtained adding to T-RTS: two for BGL <160mg/dL (8.9mmol/L); one for BGL ≥160mg/dL and < 200mg/dL (11.1mmol/L); and zero for BGL ≥ 200mg/dL. The primary outcome was a composite of patient's death in ED or admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the overall performance of T-RTS and of the combined RTS-G score. Among a total of 68,933 traumas, 9,436 patients (4,407 females) were enrolled, aged from 18 to 103 years; 4,288 were aged ≥65 years. A total of 577 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint: 38 patients died in ED (0.4%) and 539 patients were admitted to ICU. The T-RTS and BGL were independently associated to primary endpoint at multivariate analysis. The cumulative RTS-G score was significantly more accurate than T-RTS and reached the best accuracy in elderly patients. In general population, ROC area under curve (AUC) for T-RTS was 0.671 (95% CI, 0.661 - 0.680) compared to RTS-G ROC AUC 0.743 (95% CI, 0.734 - 0.752); P <.001. In patients ≥65 years, T-RTS ROC AUC was 0.671 (95% CI, 0.657 - 0.685) compared to RTS-G ROC AUC 0.780 (95% CI, 0.768 - 0.793); P <.001. Results showed RTS-G could be used effectively at ED triage for the risk stratification for death in ED and ICU admission of trauma patients, and it could reduce under-triage of approximately 20% compared to T-RTS. Comparing ROC AUCs, the combined RTS-G score performs significantly better than T-RTS and gives best results in patients ≥65 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33345764
pii: S1049023X2000148X
doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2000148X
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

175-182

Auteurs

Marcello Covino (M)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Raffaella Zaccaria (R)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Maria Grazia Bocci (MG)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Luigi Carbone (L)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Enrico Torelli (E)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Mariella Fuorlo (M)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Andrea Piccioni (A)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Michele Santoro (M)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.

Claudio Sandroni (C)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Roma.

Francesco Franceschi (F)

Emergency Department - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Roma.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH