Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in England.
hospital eye service
inter-disciplinary communication
primary care optometrist
referral
Journal
Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
08
07
2020
accepted:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
24
12
2020
medline:
30
11
2021
entrez:
23
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the UK, most referrals to the hospital eye service (HES) originate from community optometrists (CO). This audit investigates the quality of referrals, replies, and communication between CO and the HES. Optometric referrals and replies were extracted from three practices in England. If no reply letter was found, the records were searched at each local HES unit, and additional replies or records copied. De-identified referrals, replies and records were audited by a panel against established standards to evaluate whether the referrals were necessary, accurate and directed to the appropriate professional. The referral rate (RR) and referral reply rate (RRR) were calculated. A total of 459 de-identified referrals were extracted. The RR ranged from 3.6%-8.7%. The proportion of referred patients who were seen in the HES unit was 63%-76%. From the CO perspective, the proportion of referrals for which they received replies ranged from 26%-49%. Adjusting the number of referrals for cases when it would be reasonable to expect an HES reply, RRR becomes 38%-62%. Patients received a copy of the reply in 3%-21% of cases. Referrals were made to the appropriate service in over 95% of cases, were judged necessary in 93%-97% and were accurate in 81%-98% of cases. The referral reply addressed the reason for the referral in 93%-97% and was meaningful in 94%-99% of cases. The most common conditions referred were glaucoma, cataract, anterior segment lesions, and neurological/ocular motor anomalies. The CO/HES dyad (pairing) in the area with the lowest average household income had the highest RR. In contrast with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists/College of Optometrists joint statement on sharing patient information, CO referrals often do not elicit a reply to the referring CO. Replies from the HES to COs are important for patient care, benefitting patients and clinicians, and minimising unnecessary HES appointments.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-377Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2020 The College of Optometrists.
Références
Optical Confederation. Optics at a Glance; 2014. http://www.opticalconfederation.org.uk; 2015 10/15.
NHS Digital. General Ophthalmic Services activity statistics - England, year ending 31 March 2019. Statistics. NHS Digital; 2019. 29/05/2020.
Konstantakopoulou E, Edgar DF, Harper RA et al. Evaluation of a minor eye conditions scheme delivered by community optometrists. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e011832.
Konstantakopoulou E, Harper RA, Edgar DF, Larkin G, Janikoun S & Lawrenson JG. Clinical safety of a minor eye conditions scheme in England delivered by community optometrists. BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 2018; 3: e000125.
Optometrists Co. The Optical Workforce Survey, 2015. London: College of Optometrists; 2016. https://www.college-optometrists.org/the-college/research/research-projects/optical-workforce-survey2.html
Bowling B, Chen SD & Salmon JF. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1102-1104.
Davey CJ, Green C & Elliott DB. Assessment of referrals to the hospital eye service by optometrists and GPs in Bradford and Airedale. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 23-28.
Scully ND, Chu L, Siriwardena D, Wormald R & Kotecha A. The quality of optometrists' referral letters for glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 26-31.
Pierscionek TJ, Moore JE & Pierscionek BK. Referrals to ophthalmology: optometric and general practice comparison. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 32-40.
El-Assal K, Foulds J, Dobson S & Sanders R. A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines. BMC Ophthalmol 2015; 15: 1-8.
Lash SC. Assessment of information included on the GOS 18 referral form used by optometrists. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 21-23.
Vernon SA & Ghosh G. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice? Eye 2001; 15(Pt 4): 458-463.
Bourne RR, French KA, Chang L, Borman AD, Hingorani M & Newsom WD. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES). Eye (London) 2010; 24: 881-887.
Swystun AG & Davey CJ. Exploring the effect of optometrist practice type on NHS funded sight test outcome. J Optom 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.03.008
Clarke M. NHS sight tests include unevaluated screening examinations that lead to waste. BMJ 2014; 348: g2084.
Evans BJW, Harle DE & Cocco B. Optometric referrals: towards a two way flow of information? Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1663.
Davey CJ, Scally AJ, Green C, Mitchell ES & Elliott DB. Factors influencing accuracy of referral and the likelihood of false positive referral by optometrists in Bradford, United Kingdom. J Optom 2016; 9: 158-165.
Pooley JE & Frost EC. Optometrists' referrals to the Hospital Eye Service. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999; 19(Suppl. 1001): S16-S24.
Khan S, Clarke J & Kotecha A. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 472-477.
RNIB. Saving money, losing sight 2013. London: RNIB; 2013. [updated 2013]. http://www.rnib.org.uk/getinvolved/campaign/policy/eyehealth/reports/Pages/saving_money_losing_sight.aspx
Royal College of Ophthalmologists, College of Optometrists. Sharing patient information between healthcare professionals - a joint statement from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and College of Optometrists UK: Royal College of Ophthalmologists; 2015 [updated 20/3/15. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/2015/03/sharing-patient-information-between-healthcare-professionals-a-joint-statement-from-the-royal-college-of-ophthalmologists-and-college-of-optometrists/
Caldicott F.The Information Governance Review. Department of Health; 2013 00/03/2013. Contract No.: 2900774.
College of Optometrists. Guidance for Professional Conduct, College of Optometrists: London, 2014. http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/professional-standards/Ethics_Guidance/index.cfm
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit, Radcliffe Medical Press: Oxford, 2002.
Hodi S. Management of ophthalmology referral letters in the United Kingdom: are traditional methods the best? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 394-398.
General Optical Council. The Rules Relating to Injury of Disease of the Eye, General Optical Council: London, 1999.
Regional gross disposable household income by local authority [Internet]. Office of National Statistics. 2018 [cited 31 May 2020]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/regionalaccounts/grossdisposablehouseholdincome/datasets/regionalgrossdisposablehouseholdincomegdhibylocalauthorityintheuk
Office for National Statistics. Regional ethnic diversity. 2020 [updated 07/08/20202; cited 2020 27/10/2020]. 1/08/2018. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/national-and-regional-populations/regional-ethnic-diversity/latest#ethnic-groups-by-area
Freeman C & Evans BJW. Investigation of the causes of non-tolerance to optometric prescriptions for spectacles. Ophthal Physl Opt 2010; 30: 1-11.
Shickle D, Farragher TM, Davey CJ, Slade SV & Syrett J. Geographical inequalities in uptake of NHS funded eye examinations: poisson modelling of small-area data for Essex, UK. J Public Health 2017; 40: e171-e179.
Lane M, Lane V, Abbott J, Braithwaite T, Shah P & Denniston AK. Multiple deprivation, vision loss, and ophthalmic disease in adults: global perspectives. Surv Ophthalmol 2018; 63: 406-436.
O’Dowd A. Primary care is still treated with “contempt”, says outgoing leader. BMJ 2015; 351: h6743.
Parkins DJ, Benwell MJ, Edgar DF & Evans BJW. The relationship between unwarranted variation in optometric referrals and time since qualification. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; 38(5): 550-561.
Fung M, Myers P, Wasala P & Hirji N. A review of 1000 referrals to Walsall's hospital eye service. J Public Health (Oxf) 2016; 38(3): 599-606.
Theodossiades J, Murdoch I & Cousens S. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial. Eye (Lond) 2004; 18(5): 483-490.
Wang YE, Li Y, Wang D, He M & Lin S. Comparison of factors associated with occludable angle between american Caucasians and ethnic Chinese. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7717-7723.
Parkins DJ, Shah B, Benwell MJ, Edgar DF & Evans BJW. Design and use of vignettes to investigate referral decision-making by optometrists. J Optom. Submitted.
Lalani M, Baines R, Bryce M et al. Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: a systematic review. Health Expect 2019; 22: 149-161.
Shah R, Edgar D & Evans BJ. Measuring clinical practice. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 113-125.
Shah R, Edgar DF & Evans BJW. The use of simulated and standardised patients in eduction, training and assessment. Optomet Pract 2018; 19: 1-10.
Shah R, Edgar DF & Evans BJW. A Comparison of standardised patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 209-224.
Ghadiri N, Hingorani M, Thomas P & Sim D. Overview of digital transformation and telemedicine during COVID-19, Royal College of Ophthalmologists: London, 2020. 09/04/2020.
Desai P, Parkins D & Richmond Z. A catalyst for change. Eye 2020; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01176-4