Objective responses to first-line neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (ICON8): post-hoc exploratory analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 20 07 2020
revised: 15 09 2020
accepted: 18 09 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 20 2 2021
entrez: 28 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary surgery (DPS) is an established strategy for women with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Although this therapeutic approach has been validated in randomised, phase 3 trials, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) has not been reported. We describe RECIST and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 responses in patients receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS in the ICON8 trial. ICON8 was an international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done across 117 hospitals in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Ireland. The trial included women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, life expectancy of more than 12 weeks, and newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; 1988) stage IC-IIA high-grade serous, clear cell, or any poorly differentiated or grade 3 histological subtype, or any FIGO (1988) stage IIB-IV epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6) and intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 women were enrolled in ICON8, of whom 779 (50%) were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS. Median follow-up was 29·5 months (IQR 15·6-54·3) for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS population. Of 564 women who had RECIST-evaluable disease at trial entry, 348 (62%) had a complete or partial response. Of 727 women who were evaluable by GCIG CA125 criteria at the time of diagnosis, 610 (84%) had a CA125 response. Median progression-free survival was 14·4 months (95% CI 9·2-28·0; 297 events) for patients with a RECIST complete or partial response and 13·3 months (8·1-20·1; 171 events) for those with RECIST stable disease. Median progression-free survival for women with a GCIG CA125 response was 13·8 months (95% CI 8·8-23·4; 544 events) and 9·7 months (5·8-14·5; 111 events) for those without a GCIG CA125 response. Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in 187 (56%) of 335 women with a RECIST complete or partial response and 73 (42%) of 172 women with RECIST stable disease. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 290 (50%) of 576 women with a GCIG CA125 response and 30 (30%) of 101 women without a GCIG CA125 response. The RECIST-defined radiological response rate was lower than that frequently quoted to patients in the clinic. RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer should not be used as individual predictive markers to stratify patients who are likely to benefit from DPS, but instead used in conjunction with the patient's clinical capacity to undergo cytoreductive surgery. A patient should not be denied surgery based solely on the lack of a RECIST or GCIG CA125 response. Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, Health Research Board in Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary surgery (DPS) is an established strategy for women with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Although this therapeutic approach has been validated in randomised, phase 3 trials, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) has not been reported. We describe RECIST and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 responses in patients receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS in the ICON8 trial.
METHODS
ICON8 was an international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done across 117 hospitals in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Ireland. The trial included women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, life expectancy of more than 12 weeks, and newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; 1988) stage IC-IIA high-grade serous, clear cell, or any poorly differentiated or grade 3 histological subtype, or any FIGO (1988) stage IIB-IV epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6) and intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m
FINDINGS
Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 women were enrolled in ICON8, of whom 779 (50%) were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS. Median follow-up was 29·5 months (IQR 15·6-54·3) for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS population. Of 564 women who had RECIST-evaluable disease at trial entry, 348 (62%) had a complete or partial response. Of 727 women who were evaluable by GCIG CA125 criteria at the time of diagnosis, 610 (84%) had a CA125 response. Median progression-free survival was 14·4 months (95% CI 9·2-28·0; 297 events) for patients with a RECIST complete or partial response and 13·3 months (8·1-20·1; 171 events) for those with RECIST stable disease. Median progression-free survival for women with a GCIG CA125 response was 13·8 months (95% CI 8·8-23·4; 544 events) and 9·7 months (5·8-14·5; 111 events) for those without a GCIG CA125 response. Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in 187 (56%) of 335 women with a RECIST complete or partial response and 73 (42%) of 172 women with RECIST stable disease. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 290 (50%) of 576 women with a GCIG CA125 response and 30 (30%) of 101 women without a GCIG CA125 response.
INTERPRETATION
The RECIST-defined radiological response rate was lower than that frequently quoted to patients in the clinic. RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer should not be used as individual predictive markers to stratify patients who are likely to benefit from DPS, but instead used in conjunction with the patient's clinical capacity to undergo cytoreductive surgery. A patient should not be denied surgery based solely on the lack of a RECIST or GCIG CA125 response.
FUNDING
Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, Health Research Board in Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33357510
pii: S1470-2045(20)30591-X
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30591-X
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

CA-125 Antigen 0
MUC16 protein, human 0
Membrane Proteins 0
Carboplatin BG3F62OND5
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01654146']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

277-288

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1489/A12127
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/9
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/20
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : CA1489/A1709
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1100425
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12127
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/25
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 13034
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Robert D Morgan (RD)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Iain A McNeish (IA)

Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Adrian D Cook (AD)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Elizabeth C James (EC)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Rosemary Lord (R)

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, UK.

Graham Dark (G)

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Rosalind M Glasspool (RM)

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

Jonathan Krell (J)

Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Christine Parkinson (C)

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Christopher J Poole (CJ)

Arden Cancer Research Centre, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Marcia Hall (M)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Dolores Gallardo-Rincón (D)

Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.

Michelle Lockley (M)

St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Sharadah Essapen (S)

Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Jeff Summers (J)

Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK.

Anjana Anand (A)

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Abel Zachariah (A)

Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.

Sarah Williams (S)

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Rachel Jones (R)

South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK.

Kate Scatchard (K)

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

Axel Walther (A)

University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Jae-Weon Kim (JW)

Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Sudha Sundar (S)

Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Gordon C Jayson (GC)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Jonathan A Ledermann (JA)

UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Andrew R Clamp (AR)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: andrew.clamp@christie.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH