Mammographic density as an image-based biomarker of therapy response in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer patients.


Journal

Cancer causes & control : CCC
ISSN: 1573-7225
Titre abrégé: Cancer Causes Control
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9100846

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 24 07 2020
accepted: 04 12 2020
pubmed: 31 12 2020
medline: 20 4 2021
entrez: 30 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Personalized cancer treatment requires predictive biomarkers, including image-based biomarkers. Breast cancer (BC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are in a clinically vulnerable situation with the tumor present. This study investigated whether mammographic density (MD), assessed pre-NACT, is predictive of pathological complete response (pCR). A total of 495 BC patients receiving NACT in Sweden 2005-2019 were included, merged from two different cohorts. Cohort 1 was retrospectively collected (n = 295) and cohort 2 was prospectively collected (n = 200). Mammograms were scored for MD pre-NACT according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 5th Edition. The association between MD and accomplishing pCR post-NACT was analyzed using logistic regression models-for the whole cohort, stratified by menopausal status, and in different St. Gallen surrogate subtypes. In comparison to patients with low MD (BI-RADS a), the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of accomplishing pCR following NACT was on a descending scale: 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.57), 0.38 (95% CI 0.14-1.02), and 0.32 (95% CI 0.09-1.08) for BI-RADS b, c, and d, respectively. For premenopausal patients selectively, the corresponding point estimates were lower, although wider CIs: 0.31 (95% CI 0.06-1.62), 0.24 (95% CI 0.04-1.27), and 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.88). Subgroup analyses based on BC subtypes resulted in imprecise estimates, i.e., wide CIs. It seemed as though patients with higher MD at baseline were less likely to reach pCR after NACT-a finding more pronounced in premenopausal women. Larger multicenter studies are needed to enable analyses and interpretation for different BC subtypes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33377172
doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01379-w
pii: 10.1007/s10552-020-01379-w
pmc: PMC7870759
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

251-260

Références

Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 04;17:79
pubmed: 26040322
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54
pubmed: 22766518
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2206-23
pubmed: 23917950
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1541-1557
pubmed: 31373601
Dis Model Mech. 2011 Mar;4(2):165-78
pubmed: 21324931
Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1736-47
pubmed: 21709140
Breast. 2020 Oct;53:33-41
pubmed: 32563178
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 04;15(6):R104
pubmed: 24188089
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 May 03;18(1):45
pubmed: 27142210
BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1272
pubmed: 31888552
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99
pubmed: 28094848
Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223
pubmed: 22114898
Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Aug;6(8):583-92
pubmed: 16862189
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(1):201
pubmed: 18226174
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50
pubmed: 27209009
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27-39
pubmed: 29242041
Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52
pubmed: 10963602
Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):576-81
pubmed: 26071795
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):736-50
pubmed: 19436038
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 6;96(19):1467-72
pubmed: 15467036
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Sep;177(2):251-276
pubmed: 31177342
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2014 Dec;7(4):149-56
pubmed: 25300565
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:229-56
pubmed: 17459001
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1228-1236
pubmed: 28152151
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 23;12(1):605
pubmed: 31547858
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Apr;144(3):479-502
pubmed: 24615497
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):356-64
pubmed: 26230976

Auteurs

Ida Skarping (I)

Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. ida.skarping@med.lu.se.

Daniel Förnvik (D)

Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Uffe Heide-Jørgensen (U)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Hanna Sartor (H)

Department of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.

Per Hall (P)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sophia Zackrisson (S)

Department of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.

Signe Borgquist (S)

Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH