CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex genome editing of the hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase gene family alters arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation and function in Arabidopsis.
Arabidopsis
/ genetics
Arabidopsis Proteins
/ genetics
CRISPR-Cas Systems
Galactans
/ genetics
Galactosyltransferases
/ genetics
Gene Editing
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Genes, Plant
Genetic Variation
Genome, Plant
Genotype
Glycosylation
Mucoproteins
/ genetics
Mutation
Plant Breeding
/ methods
Arabidopsis
Arabinogalactan-proteins
CRISPR/Cas9
Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein
Hyp-O-galactosyltransferase
Pollen
Reproduction
Root hair
Seed germination
Yariv
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2021
06 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
07
08
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
10
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are a class of hydroxyproline-rich proteins (HRGPs) that are heavily glycosylated (> 90%) with type II arabinogalactans (AGs). AGPs are implicated in various plant growth and development processes including cell expansion, somatic embryogenesis, root and stem growth, salt tolerance, hormone signaling, male and female gametophyte development, and defense. To date, eight Hyp-O-galactosyltransferases (GALT2-6, HPGT1-3) have been identified; these enzymes are responsible for adding the first sugar, galactose, onto AGPs. Due to gene redundancy among the GALTs, single or double galt genetic knockout mutants are often not sufficient to fully reveal their biological functions. Here, we report the successful application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing technology to generate higher-order knockout mutants of five members of the GALT gene family (GALT2-6). AGPs analysis of higher-order galt mutants (galt2 galt5, galt3 galt4 galt6, and galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6) demonstrated significantly less glycosylated AGPs in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques compared to the corresponding wild-type organs. Monosaccharide composition analysis of AGPs isolated from rosette leaves revealed significant decreases in arabinose and galactose in all the higher-order galt mutants. Phenotypic analyses revealed that mutation of two or more GALT genes was able to overcome the growth inhibitory effect of β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent, which specifically binds to β-1,3-galactan backbones on AGPs. In addition, the galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutant exhibited reduced overall growth, impaired root growth, abnormal pollen, shorter siliques, and reduced seed set. Reciprocal crossing experiments demonstrated that galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutants had defects in the female gametophyte which were responsible for reduced seed set. Our CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing approach provides a simpler and faster way to generate higher-order mutants for functional characterization compared to conventional genetic crossing of T-DNA mutant lines. Higher-order galt mutants produced and characterized in this study provide insight into the relationship between sugar decorations and the various biological functions attributed to AGPs in plants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are a class of hydroxyproline-rich proteins (HRGPs) that are heavily glycosylated (> 90%) with type II arabinogalactans (AGs). AGPs are implicated in various plant growth and development processes including cell expansion, somatic embryogenesis, root and stem growth, salt tolerance, hormone signaling, male and female gametophyte development, and defense. To date, eight Hyp-O-galactosyltransferases (GALT2-6, HPGT1-3) have been identified; these enzymes are responsible for adding the first sugar, galactose, onto AGPs. Due to gene redundancy among the GALTs, single or double galt genetic knockout mutants are often not sufficient to fully reveal their biological functions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Here, we report the successful application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing technology to generate higher-order knockout mutants of five members of the GALT gene family (GALT2-6). AGPs analysis of higher-order galt mutants (galt2 galt5, galt3 galt4 galt6, and galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6) demonstrated significantly less glycosylated AGPs in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques compared to the corresponding wild-type organs. Monosaccharide composition analysis of AGPs isolated from rosette leaves revealed significant decreases in arabinose and galactose in all the higher-order galt mutants. Phenotypic analyses revealed that mutation of two or more GALT genes was able to overcome the growth inhibitory effect of β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent, which specifically binds to β-1,3-galactan backbones on AGPs. In addition, the galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutant exhibited reduced overall growth, impaired root growth, abnormal pollen, shorter siliques, and reduced seed set. Reciprocal crossing experiments demonstrated that galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutants had defects in the female gametophyte which were responsible for reduced seed set.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing approach provides a simpler and faster way to generate higher-order mutants for functional characterization compared to conventional genetic crossing of T-DNA mutant lines. Higher-order galt mutants produced and characterized in this study provide insight into the relationship between sugar decorations and the various biological functions attributed to AGPs in plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407116
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02791-9
pii: 10.1186/s12870-020-02791-9
pmc: PMC7789275
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Galactans
0
Mucoproteins
0
Galactosyltransferases
EC 2.4.1.-
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16Références
Commun Integr Biol. 2016 May 05;9(3):e1177687
pubmed: 27489583
Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1093-7
pubmed: 23180860
Am J Bot. 2014 Nov;101(11):1963-75
pubmed: 25366861
New Phytol. 2006;169(3):479-92
pubmed: 16411951
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 20;11:589517
pubmed: 33329650
Plant Cell. 2013 Apr;25(4):1274-87
pubmed: 23572547
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 25;26(8):1091-7
pubmed: 27068416
Mol Plant. 2016 Apr 4;9(4):601-14
pubmed: 26774620
J Exp Bot. 2013 Dec;64(18):5537-51
pubmed: 24127514
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Jun 27;3:140
pubmed: 22754559
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Feb;135:9-18
pubmed: 30496891
Plant J. 2015 Mar;81(5):736-46
pubmed: 25600942
Phytochemistry. 2004 May;65(10):1429-38
pubmed: 15231417
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 05;11(1):e0145092
pubmed: 26731606
Plant Cell. 2008 Nov;20(11):3065-79
pubmed: 19017745
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Dec 21;15:295
pubmed: 26690932
Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):735-43
pubmed: 10069079
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15-16):4027-35
pubmed: 18039740
Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec;142(4):1469-79
pubmed: 17056757
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):403-19
pubmed: 20388666
Genome Biol. 2015 Jul 21;16:144
pubmed: 26193878
Plant Cell. 2013 Jan;25(1):270-87
pubmed: 23371948
J Biol Chem. 2013 Apr 5;288(14):10132-43
pubmed: 23430255
Plant Physiol. 2010 Aug;153(4):1563-76
pubmed: 20547702
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 May 18;20(1):221
pubmed: 32423474
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(11):3133-42
pubmed: 19433479
Cell. 1995 Aug 11;82(3):395-403
pubmed: 7634329
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 16;7:1895
pubmed: 28018417
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 15;7:814
pubmed: 27379116
Plant J. 2010 Nov;64(3):482-97
pubmed: 20807209
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jan;173(1):183-205
pubmed: 27837085
Plant J. 1996 Jun;9(6):919-25
pubmed: 8696368
Ann Bot. 2012 Aug;110(3):573-84
pubmed: 22652420
J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr 30;285(18):13638-45
pubmed: 20194500
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Jan 08;13:7
pubmed: 23297674
Plant J. 2013 Dec;76(6):1016-29
pubmed: 24128328
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:137-61
pubmed: 17201686
Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(2):383-404
pubmed: 22786747
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jan;173(1):167-182
pubmed: 27495941
Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar;161(3):1117-26
pubmed: 23296690
J Genet Genomics. 2017 Apr 20;44(4):207-213
pubmed: 28416245
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001 Sep;58(10):1399-417
pubmed: 11693522
Plant J. 2007 Feb;49(4):629-40
pubmed: 17217456
Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(6):e28891
pubmed: 24739253
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1116:119-31
pubmed: 24395361
Plant Reprod. 2019 Sep;32(3):291-305
pubmed: 31049682
Mol Plant. 2013 Jul;6(4):1369-72
pubmed: 23396039
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e93291
pubmed: 24667545
Plant Mol Biol. 2018 Mar;96(4-5):445-456
pubmed: 29476306
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3570-5
pubmed: 25733849
Plant J. 2016 Dec;88(6):1058-1070
pubmed: 27549386
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Apr 03;14:90
pubmed: 24693939