Effectiveness of disinfectants against the spread of tobamoviruses: Tomato brown rugose fruit virus and Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus.
CGMMV
Disease control
Disinfectants
ToBRFV
Tobamovirus
Tomato and watermelon
Journal
Virology journal
ISSN: 1743-422X
Titre abrégé: Virol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 01 2021
06 01 2021
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
accepted:
21
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tobamoviruses, including tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) on tomato and pepper, and cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) on cucumber and watermelon, have caused many disease outbreaks around the world in recent years. With seed-borne, mechanical transmission and resistant breaking traits, tobamoviruses pose serious threat to vegetable production worldwide. With the absence of a commercial resistant cultivar, growers are encouraged to take preventative measures to manage those highly contagious viral diseases. However, there is no information available on which disinfectants are effective to deactivate the virus infectivity on contaminated hands, tools and equipment for these emerging tobamoviruses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a collection of 16 chemical disinfectants for their effectiveness against mechanical transmission of two emerging tobamoviruses, ToBRFV and CGMMV. Bioassay was used to evaluate the efficacy of each disinfectant based on virus infectivity remaining in a prepared virus inoculum after three short exposure times (10 s, 30 s and 60 s) to the disinfectant and inoculated mechanically on three respective test plants (ToBRFV on tomato and CGMMV on watermelon). Percent infection of plants was measured through symptom observation on the test plants and the presence of the virus was confirmed through an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with appropriate antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA based on data collected from three independent experiments. Through comparative analysis of percent infection of test plants, a similar trend of efficacy among 16 disinfectants was observed between the two pathosystems. Four common disinfectants with broad spectrum activities against two different tobamoviruses were identified. Those effective disinfectants with 90-100% efficacy against both tobamoviruses were 0.5% Lactoferrin, 2% Virocid, and 10% Clorox, plus 2% Virkon against CGMMV and 3% Virkon against ToBRFV. In addition, SP2700 generated a significant effect against CGMMV, but poorly against ToBRFV. Identification of common disinfectants against ToBRFV and CGMMV, two emerging tobamoviruses in two different pathosystems suggest their potential broader effects against other tobamoviruses or even other viruses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Tobamoviruses, including tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) on tomato and pepper, and cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) on cucumber and watermelon, have caused many disease outbreaks around the world in recent years. With seed-borne, mechanical transmission and resistant breaking traits, tobamoviruses pose serious threat to vegetable production worldwide. With the absence of a commercial resistant cultivar, growers are encouraged to take preventative measures to manage those highly contagious viral diseases. However, there is no information available on which disinfectants are effective to deactivate the virus infectivity on contaminated hands, tools and equipment for these emerging tobamoviruses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a collection of 16 chemical disinfectants for their effectiveness against mechanical transmission of two emerging tobamoviruses, ToBRFV and CGMMV.
METHODS
Bioassay was used to evaluate the efficacy of each disinfectant based on virus infectivity remaining in a prepared virus inoculum after three short exposure times (10 s, 30 s and 60 s) to the disinfectant and inoculated mechanically on three respective test plants (ToBRFV on tomato and CGMMV on watermelon). Percent infection of plants was measured through symptom observation on the test plants and the presence of the virus was confirmed through an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with appropriate antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA based on data collected from three independent experiments.
RESULTS
Through comparative analysis of percent infection of test plants, a similar trend of efficacy among 16 disinfectants was observed between the two pathosystems. Four common disinfectants with broad spectrum activities against two different tobamoviruses were identified. Those effective disinfectants with 90-100% efficacy against both tobamoviruses were 0.5% Lactoferrin, 2% Virocid, and 10% Clorox, plus 2% Virkon against CGMMV and 3% Virkon against ToBRFV. In addition, SP2700 generated a significant effect against CGMMV, but poorly against ToBRFV.
CONCLUSION
Identification of common disinfectants against ToBRFV and CGMMV, two emerging tobamoviruses in two different pathosystems suggest their potential broader effects against other tobamoviruses or even other viruses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407624
doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01479-8
pii: 10.1186/s12985-020-01479-8
pmc: PMC7787650
doi:
Substances chimiques
Disinfectants
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7Références
Arch Virol. 2016 Feb;161(2):503-6
pubmed: 26586328
Arch Virol. 2018 Jul;163(7):1863-1875
pubmed: 29582165
Phytopathology. 2017 Sep;107(9):1080-1086
pubmed: 28545349
Plant Dis. 2013 Jun;97(6):765-771
pubmed: 30722621
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013 Jan;105(1):62-8
pubmed: 24238292
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020 Jul 16;9(29):
pubmed: 32675187
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017 Aug 4;55:231-256
pubmed: 28590876
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2014 May;111:14-8
pubmed: 24861928
Virus Evol. 2015 Dec 16;1(1):vev019
pubmed: 27774289
Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Dec;12(9):938-54
pubmed: 22017770
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:13-34
pubmed: 15283658
Plant Dis. 2019 Jun;103(6):1126-1131
pubmed: 30995423
J Mol Evol. 2010 Oct;71(4):298-307
pubmed: 20838783
Plant Dis. 2010 Mar;94(3):325-328
pubmed: 30754250
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 19;8(47):82446-82458
pubmed: 29137277
Antiviral Res. 2001 Dec;52(3):225-39
pubmed: 11675140
Virol J. 2010 Feb 03;7:26
pubmed: 20128897
Plant Dis. 2004 Jun;88(6):674-679
pubmed: 30812592
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1717-22
pubmed: 15006797
Virol J. 2015 Jan 27;12:5
pubmed: 25623384
Plant Dis. 2014 Aug;98(8):1163
pubmed: 30708828
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210871
pubmed: 30653593
Plant Dis. 2014 May;98(5):701
pubmed: 30708523
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0170429
pubmed: 28107419
Viruses. 2019 Sep 03;11(9):
pubmed: 31484426
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Feb 26;17(3):252
pubmed: 26927077
Plant Dis. 2010 May;94(5):542-550
pubmed: 30754474