Experimental and Monte Carlo characterization of a dynamic collimation system prototype for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 24 05 2020
revised: 02 08 2020
accepted: 03 08 2020
entrez: 7 1 2021
pubmed: 8 1 2021
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There has been a growing interest in the development of energy-specific collimators for low-energy pencil beam scanning (PBS) to reduce the lateral penumbra. One particular device that has been the focus of several recent published works is the dynamic collimation system (DCS), which provides energy-specific collimation by intercepting the scanned proton beam as it nears to target edge with a set of orthogonal trimmer blades. While several computational studies have shown that this dynamic collimator can provide additional healthy tissue sparing, there has not been any rigorous experimental work to benchmark the theoretical models used in these initial studies. Therefore, it was the purpose of this work to demonstrate an experimental method that could integrate an experimental prototype with a clinical PBS system and benchmark the Monte Carlo methods that have been used to model the DCS. An experimental DCS prototype was designed and built in house to actively collimate individual proton beamlets during PBS within a well-characterized experimental setup. Monte Carlo methods were initially used to assess construction tolerances and later benchmarked against measurements, including integral depth dose and lateral asymmetric beamlet profiles. The experimental apparatus and measurement geometry were modeled using MCNP6 benchmarked from measurements performed at the Northwestern Chicago Proton Center. Gamma analysis tests were used to evaluate the agreement between the measured and simulated profiles with a strict 1 mm/1% criteria and 5% dose threshold. Excellent agreement was observed between the simulated and measured profiles, which included 1 mm/1% gamma analysis pass rates of at least 100% and 95% for the integral depth dose (IDD) profiles and lateral profiles, respectively. Differences in the relative profile shape were observed experimentally between beamlets collimated on- and off-axis, which was attributed to the partial transmission of the beam through an unfocused collimator. Exposure rates resulting from the activation of the device were monitored with survey meter measurements and were found to agree with Monte Carlo estimates of the exposure rate to within 20%. A DCS prototype was constructed and integrated into a clinical dose delivery system. While the results of this work are not exhaustive, they demonstrate the effects of beam source divergence, device activation, and beamlet deflection during scanning, which were found to be successfully modeled using Monte Carlo methods and experimentally benchmarked. Excellent agreement was achieved between the simulated and measured lateral spot profiles of collimated beamlets delivered on- and off-axis in PBS. The Monte Carlo models adequately predicted the measured elevated plateau region in the integral depth-dose profiles from the low-energy scatter off the collimators.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33411329
doi: 10.1002/mp.14453
pmc: PMC8012152
mid: NIHMS1680355
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5343-5356

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA226518
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Med Phys. 2015 Mar;42(3):1321-34
pubmed: 25735287
Med Phys. 2001 Jun;28(6):975-87
pubmed: 11439494
Int J Part Ther. 2016 Mar;2(4):544-554
pubmed: 31772966
Med Phys. 2020 Aug;47(8):3545-3553
pubmed: 32338770
Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2716-2728
pubmed: 30740699
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):072101
pubmed: 23822445
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 21;59(22):N187-96
pubmed: 25330783
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4693
pubmed: 27487886
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 21;62(2):377-393
pubmed: 27997377
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Oct 21;64(20):205025
pubmed: 31484170
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4960-70
pubmed: 20964215
Med Phys. 2005 Dec;32(12):3511-23
pubmed: 16475750
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 7;58(17):6193-204
pubmed: 23948730
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):171-180
pubmed: 26614424
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21;56(24):7813-27
pubmed: 22112370
Med Phys. 2019 Apr;46(4):1922-1930
pubmed: 30740709
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 21;59(16):4635-59
pubmed: 25079387
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Feb 7;50(3):541-61
pubmed: 15773729
Phys Med. 2017 Feb;34:48-54
pubmed: 28118950
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1421-7
pubmed: 26936726
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 7;55(13):3741-51
pubmed: 20530848
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):2725-2734
pubmed: 32170750
Med Phys. 2014 Sep;41(9):091701
pubmed: 25186376

Auteurs

Blake R Smith (BR)

Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Mark Pankuch (M)

Division of Medical Physics, Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Parkway, Warrenville, IL, 60555, USA.

Daniel E Hyer (DE)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Wesley S Culberson (WS)

Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Phantoms, Imaging Radiography Patient Positioning Radiology
Humans Female Precision Medicine Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Breast Neoplasms
Deep Learning Humans Microvessels Ultrasonography Phantoms, Imaging

Classifications MeSH