The impact of integrating environmental health into medical school curricula: a survey-based study.

Climate change Environmental health Environmental justice Health disparities Medical education Prevention

Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 13 07 2020
accepted: 16 12 2020
entrez: 9 1 2021
pubmed: 10 1 2021
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Inclusion of environmental health (EH) in medical education serves as a catalyst for preparing future physicians to address issues as complex as climate change and health, water pollution and lead contamination. However, previous research has found EH education to be largely lacking in U.S. medical education, putting future physicians at risk of not having the expertise to address patients' environmental illnesses, nor speak to prevention. Environmental health (EH) knowledge and skills were incorporated into the first-year medical school curriculum at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine (Nutley, New Jersey), via a two-hour interactive large group learning module with follow up activities. Students completed the Environmental Health in Med School (EHMS) survey before and after the year 1 EH module. This survey evaluates medical students' attitudes, awareness and professionalism regarding environmental health. In year 2, students completed the Environmental Health Survey II, which measured students' perceptions of preparedness to discuss EH with future patients. The research team created both surveys based upon learning objectives that broadly aligned with the Institute of Medicine six competency-based environmental health learning objectives. 36 year 1 students completed both the pre and post EHMS surveys. McNemar's test was used for paired comparisons. Results identified no statistically significant changes from pre to post surveys, identifying a dramatic ceiling. When comparing year 2, EHS II pre-survey (n = 84) and post-survey (n = 79) responses, a statistically significant positive change in students' self-reported sense of preparedness to discuss environmental health with their patients following the curriculum intervention was noted. Our conclusion for the EHMS in Year 1 was that the current generation of medical students at this school is already extremely aware of and concerned about the impact of environmental issues on health. Through the EHS II in Year 2, we found that the six-week environmental health module combining didactic and experiential elements significantly increased medical students' self-reported sense of preparedness to discuss environmental health issues, including climate change, with their patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Inclusion of environmental health (EH) in medical education serves as a catalyst for preparing future physicians to address issues as complex as climate change and health, water pollution and lead contamination. However, previous research has found EH education to be largely lacking in U.S. medical education, putting future physicians at risk of not having the expertise to address patients' environmental illnesses, nor speak to prevention.
METHODS METHODS
Environmental health (EH) knowledge and skills were incorporated into the first-year medical school curriculum at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine (Nutley, New Jersey), via a two-hour interactive large group learning module with follow up activities. Students completed the Environmental Health in Med School (EHMS) survey before and after the year 1 EH module. This survey evaluates medical students' attitudes, awareness and professionalism regarding environmental health. In year 2, students completed the Environmental Health Survey II, which measured students' perceptions of preparedness to discuss EH with future patients. The research team created both surveys based upon learning objectives that broadly aligned with the Institute of Medicine six competency-based environmental health learning objectives.
RESULTS RESULTS
36 year 1 students completed both the pre and post EHMS surveys. McNemar's test was used for paired comparisons. Results identified no statistically significant changes from pre to post surveys, identifying a dramatic ceiling. When comparing year 2, EHS II pre-survey (n = 84) and post-survey (n = 79) responses, a statistically significant positive change in students' self-reported sense of preparedness to discuss environmental health with their patients following the curriculum intervention was noted.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our conclusion for the EHMS in Year 1 was that the current generation of medical students at this school is already extremely aware of and concerned about the impact of environmental issues on health. Through the EHS II in Year 2, we found that the six-week environmental health module combining didactic and experiential elements significantly increased medical students' self-reported sense of preparedness to discuss environmental health issues, including climate change, with their patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33419439
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02458-x
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02458-x
pmc: PMC7796639
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

40

Références

Med Teach. 2017 Oct;39(10):1040-1050
pubmed: 28681652
Acad Med. 1999 Aug;74(8 Suppl):S59-68
pubmed: 10495745
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1755-60
pubmed: 15579423
Acad Med. 2018 Dec;93(12):1774-1777
pubmed: 30024475
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):628-32
pubmed: 26703416
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Aug 1;124(8):A133-6
pubmed: 27479986
Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):818-819
pubmed: 29846228
Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):515-520
pubmed: 28145945
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Aug;60(8):754-759
pubmed: 29557838
Educ Prim Care. 2010 May;21(3):194-5
pubmed: 20515548
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):163-6.e1
pubmed: 25068558
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015 Oct;37(7):491-7
pubmed: 26334434
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4 Suppl 3):S296-301
pubmed: 21961679
JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1511-1513
pubmed: 28329040
Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;77(1):114-23
pubmed: 20101722
Ambul Pediatr. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):108-11
pubmed: 11888382

Auteurs

Benjamin Kligler (B)

The Deirdre Imus Environmental Health Center®, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Genevieve Pinto Zipp (G)

Department of Interprofessional Health Sciences & Health Administration, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University, Nutley, NJ, USA.

Carmela Rocchetti (C)

Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA.

Michelle Secic (M)

Secic Statistical Consulting, Inc., Chardon, OH, USA.

Erin Speiser Ihde (ES)

The Deirdre Imus Environmental Health Center®, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA. erin.ihde@hmhn.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH