The Mutational Landscape of Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: The Spectrum Theory Revisited.
Next Generation Sequencing
Oligometastatic prostate cancer
Journal
European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
27
08
2020
accepted:
26
12
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
29
3
2022
entrez:
9
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emerging data suggest that metastasis is a spectrum of disease burden rather than a binary state, and local therapies, such as radiation, might improve outcomes in oligometastasis. However, current definitions of oligometastasis are solely numerical. To characterize the somatic mutational landscape across the disease spectrum of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) to elucidate a biological definition of oligometastatic CSPC. This was a retrospective study of men with mCSPC who underwent clinical-grade sequencing of their tumors (269 primary tumor, 25 metastatic sites). Patients were classified as having biochemically recurrent (ie, micrometastatic), metachronous oligometastatic (≤5 lesions), metachronous polymetastatic (>5 lesions), or de novo metastatic (metastasis at diagnosis) disease. We measured the frequency of driver mutations across metastatic classifications and the genomic associations with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and time to castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The frequency of driver mutations in TP53 (p = 0.01), WNT (p = 0.08), and cell cycle (p = 0.04) genes increased across the mCSPC spectrum. TP53 mutation was associated with shorter rPFS (26.7 vs 48.6 mo; p = 0.002), and time to CRPC (95.6 vs 155.8 mo; p = 0.02) in men with oligometastasis, and identified men with polymetastasis with better rPFS (TP53 wild-type, 42.7 mo; TP53 mutated, 18.5 mo; p = 0.01). Mutations in TP53 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.45; p = 0.004) and DNA double-strand break repair (IRR 1.61; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher number of metastases. Mutations in TP53 were also independently associated with shorter rPFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; p = 0.03) and the development of CRPC (HR 1.71; p = 0.01) on multivariable analysis. This study was limited by its retrospective nature, sample size, and the use of commercially available sequencing platforms, resulting in a limited predefined set of genes examined. Somatic mutational profiles reveal a spectrum of metastatic biology that helps in redefining oligometastasis beyond a simple binary state of lesion enumeration. Oligometastatic prostate cancer is typically defined as less than three to five metastatic lesions and evidence suggests that using radiation or surgery to treat these sites improves clinical outcomes. As of now, treatment decisions for oligometastasis are solely defined according to the number of lesions. However, this study suggests that tumor mutational profiles can provide a biological definition of oligometastasis and complement currently used numerical definitions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Emerging data suggest that metastasis is a spectrum of disease burden rather than a binary state, and local therapies, such as radiation, might improve outcomes in oligometastasis. However, current definitions of oligometastasis are solely numerical.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the somatic mutational landscape across the disease spectrum of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) to elucidate a biological definition of oligometastatic CSPC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This was a retrospective study of men with mCSPC who underwent clinical-grade sequencing of their tumors (269 primary tumor, 25 metastatic sites). Patients were classified as having biochemically recurrent (ie, micrometastatic), metachronous oligometastatic (≤5 lesions), metachronous polymetastatic (>5 lesions), or de novo metastatic (metastasis at diagnosis) disease.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
We measured the frequency of driver mutations across metastatic classifications and the genomic associations with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and time to castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
The frequency of driver mutations in TP53 (p = 0.01), WNT (p = 0.08), and cell cycle (p = 0.04) genes increased across the mCSPC spectrum. TP53 mutation was associated with shorter rPFS (26.7 vs 48.6 mo; p = 0.002), and time to CRPC (95.6 vs 155.8 mo; p = 0.02) in men with oligometastasis, and identified men with polymetastasis with better rPFS (TP53 wild-type, 42.7 mo; TP53 mutated, 18.5 mo; p = 0.01). Mutations in TP53 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.45; p = 0.004) and DNA double-strand break repair (IRR 1.61; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher number of metastases. Mutations in TP53 were also independently associated with shorter rPFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; p = 0.03) and the development of CRPC (HR 1.71; p = 0.01) on multivariable analysis. This study was limited by its retrospective nature, sample size, and the use of commercially available sequencing platforms, resulting in a limited predefined set of genes examined.
CONCLUSIONS
Somatic mutational profiles reveal a spectrum of metastatic biology that helps in redefining oligometastasis beyond a simple binary state of lesion enumeration.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Oligometastatic prostate cancer is typically defined as less than three to five metastatic lesions and evidence suggests that using radiation or surgery to treat these sites improves clinical outcomes. As of now, treatment decisions for oligometastasis are solely defined according to the number of lesions. However, this study suggests that tumor mutational profiles can provide a biological definition of oligometastasis and complement currently used numerical definitions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33419682
pii: S0302-2838(20)31026-5
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.040
pmc: PMC10262980
mid: NIHMS1793749
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
632-640Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA092131
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA223403
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA212007
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA231776
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1402-18
pubmed: 26903579
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;1(6):531-537
pubmed: 31158100
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):8-10
pubmed: 7799047
JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-659
pubmed: 32215577
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 4;116(23):11428-11436
pubmed: 31061129
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):3-10
pubmed: 14697414
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Sep 30;18(10):
pubmed: 28973968
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-2366
pubmed: 30355464
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:
pubmed: 28825054
Arch Surg. 1984 Jun;119(6):647-51
pubmed: 6732473
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):667-675
pubmed: 30638634
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;37(18):1558-1565
pubmed: 31067138
Eur Urol. 2019 Aug;76(2):170-176
pubmed: 30293905
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1215-1228
pubmed: 26000489
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):446-453
pubmed: 29240541
Aging (Albany NY). 2015 Mar;7(3):146-7
pubmed: 25868522
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jun 1;107(2):257-260
pubmed: 32386736
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):89-97
pubmed: 30553611
Nature. 2017 Jan 19;541(7637):359-364
pubmed: 28068672
Nat Commun. 2018 May 4;9(1):1793
pubmed: 29728604
Nature. 2012 Jul 12;487(7406):239-43
pubmed: 22722839
Cell. 2018 May 3;173(4):1003-1013.e15
pubmed: 29681457
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 1;26(13):3230-3238
pubmed: 32220891
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):926-937
pubmed: 27363387
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 11;4(1):e173501
pubmed: 28973074
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 07;12:8105-8114
pubmed: 32982407
Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2051-2058
pubmed: 30982687
J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr 1;130(4):1743-1751
pubmed: 31874108
Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 15;77(12):3181-3193
pubmed: 28484075
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):1011-25
pubmed: 26544944
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):455-462
pubmed: 30227924
Oncotarget. 2015 Feb 28;6(6):3540-52
pubmed: 25686838