Large mosaic copy number variations confer autism risk.
Journal
Nature neuroscience
ISSN: 1546-1726
Titre abrégé: Nat Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
09
01
2020
accepted:
21
11
2020
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
20
3
2021
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although germline de novo copy number variants (CNVs) are known causes of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the contribution of mosaic (early-developmental) copy number variants (mCNVs) has not been explored. In this study, we assessed the contribution of mCNVs to ASD by ascertaining mCNVs in genotype array intensity data from 12,077 probands with ASD and 5,500 unaffected siblings. We detected 46 mCNVs in probands and 19 mCNVs in siblings, affecting 2.8-73.8% of cells. Probands carried a significant burden of large (>4-Mb) mCNVs, which were detected in 25 probands but only one sibling (odds ratio = 11.4, 95% confidence interval = 1.5-84.2, P = 7.4 × 10
Identifiants
pubmed: 33432194
doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00766-5
pii: 10.1038/s41593-020-00766-5
pmc: PMC7854495
mid: NIHMS1648952
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-203Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH106883
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH104964
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
ID : DP2ES030554
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
ID : K25HL150334
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
ID : R01GM108348
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM108348
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : F31 MH124393
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : R01MH104964
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K25 HL150334
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 HD090255
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : U01MH106883
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS032457
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : DMS-1939015
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HG002295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007753
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : T32MH112510
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
ID : R01HG006855
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
ID : T32GM007753
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG006855
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : DP2 ES030554
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : T32 MH112510
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : F31MH124393
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gaugler, T. et al. Most genetic risk for autism resides with common variation. Nat. Genet. 46, 881–885 (2014).
pubmed: 25038753
pmcid: 4137411
doi: 10.1038/ng.3039
De Rubeis, S. et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature 515, 209–215 (2014).
pubmed: 25363760
pmcid: 4402723
doi: 10.1038/nature13772
Turner, T. N. et al. Genomic patterns of de novo mutation in simplex autism. Cell 171, 710–722 (2017).
pubmed: 28965761
pmcid: 5679715
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.047
Sebat, J. et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316, 445–449 (2007).
pubmed: 17363630
pmcid: 2993504
doi: 10.1126/science.1138659
Sanders, S. J. et al. Multiple recurrent de novo CNVs, including duplications of the 7q11.23 Williams syndrome region, are strongly associated with autism. Neuron 70, 863–885 (2011).
pubmed: 21658581
pmcid: 3939065
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.002
Sanders, S. J. et al. Insights into autism spectrum disorder genomic architecture and biology from 71 risk loci. Neuron 87, 1215–1233 (2015).
pubmed: 26402605
pmcid: 4624267
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.016
Yuen, R. K. C. et al. Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 602–611 (2017).
pmcid: 5501701
doi: 10.1038/nn.4524
Iakoucheva, L. M., Muotri, A. R. & Sebat, J. Getting to the cores of autism. Cell 178, 1287–1298 (2019).
pubmed: 31491383
pmcid: 7039308
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.037
McConnell, M. J. et al. Intersection of diverse neuronal genomes and neuropsychiatric disease: the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network. Science 356, eaal1641 (2017).
Ju, Y. S. et al. Somatic mutations reveal asymmetric cellular dynamics in the early human embryo. Nature 543, 714–718 (2017).
pubmed: 28329761
pmcid: 6169740
doi: 10.1038/nature21703
Freed, D. & Pevsner, J. The contribution of mosaic variants to autism spectrum disorder. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006245 (2016).
pubmed: 27632392
pmcid: 5024993
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006245
Lim, E. T. et al. Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1217–1224 (2017).
pubmed: 28714951
pmcid: 5672813
doi: 10.1038/nn.4598
Krupp, D. R. et al. Exonic mosaic mutations contribute risk for autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 369–390 (2017).
pubmed: 28867142
pmcid: 5590950
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.07.016
Jamuar, S. S. et al. Somatic mutations in cerebral cortical malformations. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 733–743 (2014).
pubmed: 25140959
pmcid: 4274952
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314432
Baek, S. T., Gibbs, E. M., Gleeson, J. G. & Mathern, G. W. Hemimegalencephaly, a paradigm for somatic postzygotic neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 26, 122 (2013).
pubmed: 23449172
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835ef373
Poduri, A., Evrony, G. D., Cai, X. & Walsh, C. A. Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease. Science 341, 1237758 (2013).
pubmed: 23828942
pmcid: 3909954
doi: 10.1126/science.1237758
King, D. A. et al. Mosaic structural variation in children with developmental disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet 24, 2733–2745 (2015).
pubmed: 25634561
pmcid: 4406290
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv033
Fischbach, G. D. & Lord, C. The Simons Simplex Collection: a resource for identification of autism genetic risk factors. Neuron 68, 192–195 (2010).
pubmed: 20955926
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.006
Feliciano, P. et al. SPARK: a US cohort of 50,000 families to accelerate autism research. Neuron 97, 488–493 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.015
Loh, P.-R. et al. Reference-based phasing using the haplotype reference consortium panel. Nat. Genet. 48, 1443–1448 (2016).
pubmed: 27694958
pmcid: 5096458
doi: 10.1038/ng.3679
Loh, P.-R. et al. Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature 559, 350–355 (2018).
pubmed: 29995854
pmcid: 6054542
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0321-x
Loh, P.-R., Genovese, G. & McCarroll, S. A. Monogenic and polygenic inheritance become instruments for clonal selection. Nature 584, 136–141 (2020).
Vattathil, S. & Scheet, P. Extensive hidden genomic mosaicism revealed in normal tissue. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 571–578 (2016).
pubmed: 26942289
pmcid: 4800050
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.003
Jacobs, K. B. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 651–658 (2012).
pubmed: 22561519
pmcid: 3372921
doi: 10.1038/ng.2270
Laurie, C. C. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 642–650 (2012).
pubmed: 22561516
pmcid: 3366033
doi: 10.1038/ng.2271
Zaykin, D. V. Optimally weighted Z-test is a powerful method for combining probabilities in meta-analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1836–1841 (2011).
pubmed: 21605215
pmcid: 3135688
doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02297.x
Iossifov, I. et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature 515, 216–221 (2014).
pubmed: 25363768
pmcid: 4313871
doi: 10.1038/nature13908
Grove, J. et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 51, 431 (2019).
pubmed: 30804558
pmcid: 6454898
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8
Pinto, D. et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 677–694 (2014).
pubmed: 24768552
pmcid: 4067558
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018
O’Roak, B. J. et al. Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485, 246–250 (2012).
pubmed: 22495309
pmcid: 3350576
doi: 10.1038/nature10989
Owen, D. et al. Effects of pathogenic CNVs on physical traits in participants of the UK Biobank. BMC Genomics 19, 867 (2018).
pubmed: 30509170
pmcid: 6278042
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5292-7
Crawford, K. et al. Medical consequences of pathogenic CNVs in adults: analysis of the UK Biobank. J. Med. Genet. 56, 131–138 (2019).
pubmed: 30343275
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105477
Bracher-Smith, M. et al. Effects of pathogenic CNVs on biochemical markers: a study on the UK Biobank. Preprint at bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/723270v2 (2019).
McConnell, M. J. et al. Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science 342, 632–637 (2013).
pubmed: 24179226
pmcid: 3975283
doi: 10.1126/science.1243472
Cai, X. et al. Single-cell, genome-wide sequencing identifies clonal somatic copy-number variation in the human brain. Cell Rep. 8, 1280–1289 (2014).
pubmed: 25159146
pmcid: 4272008
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.043
Bae, T. et al. Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 359, 550–555 (2018).
pubmed: 29217587
doi: 10.1126/science.aan8690
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
pubmed: 21478889
pmcid: 3083463
doi: 10.1038/ng.806
Firth, H. V. et al. DECIPHER: database of chromosomal imbalance and phenotype in humans using ensembl resources. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84, 524–533 (2009).
pubmed: 19344873
pmcid: 2667985
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.010
Riley, K. N. et al. Recurrent deletions and duplications of chromosome 2q11.2 and 2q13 are associated with variable outcomes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 167A, 2664–2673 (2015).
pubmed: 26227573
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37269
Forsberg, L. A. Loss of chromosome Y (LOY) in blood cells is associated with increased risk for disease and mortality in aging men. Hum. Genet. 136, 657–663 (2017).
pubmed: 28424864
pmcid: 5418310
doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1799-2
Graham, E. J. et al. Somatic mosaicism of sex chromosomes in the blood and brain. Brain Res. 1721, 146345 (2019).
pubmed: 31348909
pmcid: 6717667
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146345
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).
pubmed: 26432246
pmcid: 4617611
doi: 10.1038/nature15394
Nowakowska, B. Clinical interpretation of copy number variants in the human genome. J. Appl Genet. 58, 449–457 (2017).
pubmed: 28963714
pmcid: 5655614
doi: 10.1007/s13353-017-0407-4
van den Berg, M. M. J., van Maarle, M. C., van Wely, M. & Goddijn, M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1822, 1951–1959 (2012).
pubmed: 22796359
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001
Nazeen, S., Palmer, N. P., Berger, B. & Kohane, I. S. Integrative analysis of genetic data sets reveals a shared innate immune component in autism spectrum disorder and its co-morbidities. Genome Biol. 17, 228 (2016).
pubmed: 27842596
pmcid: 5108086
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1084-z
Feenstra, I. et al. Genotype–phenotype mapping of chromosome 18q deletions by high-resolution array CGH: an update of the phenotypic map. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 143A, 1858–1867 (2007).
pubmed: 17632778
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31850
Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).
pubmed: 28641372
pmcid: 5860371
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx246
Akbarian, S. et al. The PsychENCODE project. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1707–1712 (2015).
pubmed: 26605881
pmcid: 4675669
doi: 10.1038/nn.4156
Wang, M. et al. The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data 5, 180185 (2018).
pubmed: 30204156
pmcid: 6132187
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.185
Sherman, M. A. et al. PaSD-qc: quality control for single cell whole-genome sequencing data using power spectral density estimation. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e20 (2018).
pubmed: 29186545
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1195
Feliciano, P. et al. Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for novel ASD genes. NPJ Genom. Med. 4, 19 (2019).
Diskin, S. J. et al. Adjustment of genomic waves in signal intensities from whole-genome SNP genotyping platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e126 (2008).
pubmed: 18784189
pmcid: 2577347
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn556
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
McCarthy, S. et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat. Genet. 48, 1279–1283 (2016).
Wang, K. et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. Genome Res. 17, 1665–1674 (2007).
pubmed: 17921354
pmcid: 2045149
doi: 10.1101/gr.6861907
Newcombe, R. G. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat. Med. 17, 873–890 (1998).
pubmed: 9595617
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-I
Loh, P.-R., Kichaev, G., Gazal, S., Schoech, A. P. & Price, A. L. Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets. Nat. Genet. 50, 906 (2018).
pubmed: 29892013
pmcid: 6309610
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0144-6
Jacquemont, S. et al. Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature 478, 97–102 (2011).
pubmed: 21881559
pmcid: 3637175
doi: 10.1038/nature10406
Dong, S. et al. De novo insertions and deletions of predominantly paternal origin are associated with autism spectrum disorder. Cell Rep. 9, 16–23 (2014).
pubmed: 25284784
pmcid: 4194132
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.068
Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014).
pubmed: 24487276
pmcid: 3992975
doi: 10.1038/ng.2892
McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
pubmed: 27268795
pmcid: 4893825
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
Genovese, G., Handsaker, R. E., Li, H., Kenny, E. E. & McCarroll, S. A. Mapping the human reference genome’s missing sequence by three-way admixture in Latino genomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 411–421 (2013).
pubmed: 23932108
pmcid: 3971454
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.002
Evrony, G. D. et al. Single-neuron sequencing analysis of L1 retrotransposition and somatic mutation in the human brain. Cell 151, 483–496 (2012).
pubmed: 23101622
pmcid: 3567441
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.035
Baslan, T. et al. Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1024–1041 (2012).
pubmed: 22555242
pmcid: 5069701
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.039
Ramírez, F. et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–15 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02525-w