Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 01 2021
Historique:
entrez: 25 1 2021
pubmed: 26 1 2021
medline: 20 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Bladder dysfunction is a common complication following radical hysterectomy, caused by the damage to pelvic autonomic nerves that innervate the muscles of the bladder, urethral sphincter, and pelvic floor fasciae. Bladder dysfunction increases the rates of urinary tract infection, hospital visits or admission, and patient dissatisfaction. In addition, bladder dysfunction can also negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL). Several postoperative interventions have been proposed to prevent bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic review evaluating the effectiveness and safety of these interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA2 to IIA2). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 4) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to April week 2, 2020), and Embase via Ovid (1980 to 2020, week 16). We also checked registers of clinical trials, grey literature, conference reports, and citation lists of included studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of any type of postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following a radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer. Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant RCTs, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, compared results, and made judgments on the quality and certainty of the evidence. We resolved any disagreements through discussion or consultation with a third review author. Outcomes of interest consisted of spontaneous voiding recovery one week after the operation, quality of life (QoL), adverse events, post-void residual urine volume one month after the operation, urinary tract infection over the one month following the operation, and subjective urinary symptoms. We identified 1464 records as a result of the search (excluding duplicates). Of the 20 records that potentially met the review criteria, we included five reports of four studies. Most of the studies had unclear risks of selection and reporting biases. Of the four studies, one compared bethanechol versus placebo and three studies compared suprapubic catheterisation with intermittent self-catheterisation. We identified two ongoing studies. Bethanechol versus placebo The study reported no information on the rate of spontaneous voiding recovery at one week following the operation, QoL, adverse events, urinary tract infection in the first month after surgery, and subjective urinary symptoms for this comparison. The volume of post-void residual urine, assessed at one month after surgery, among women receiving bethanechol was lower than those in the placebo group (mean difference (MD) -37.4 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60.35 to -14.45; one study, 39 participants; very-low certainty evidence). Suprapubic catheterisation versus intermittent self-catheterisation The studies reported no information on the rate of spontaneous voiding recovery at one week and post-void residual urine volume at one month following the operation for this comparison. There was no difference in risks of acute complication (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.49; one study, 71 participants; very low certainty evidence) and urinary tract infections during the first month after surgery (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.13; two studies, 95 participants; very- low certainty evidence) between participants who underwent suprapubic catheterisation and those who underwent intermittent self-catheterisation. Available data were insufficient to calculate the relative measures of the effect of interventions on QoL and subjective urinary symptoms. None of the included studies reported rate of spontaneous voiding recovery one week after surgery, time to a post-void residual volume of urine of 50 mL or less, or post-void residual urine volume at 6 and 12 months after surgery, all of which are important outcomes for assessing postoperative bladder dysfunction. Limited evidence suggested that bethanechol may minimise the risk of bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy by lowering post-void residual urine volume. The certainty of this evidence, however, was very low. The effectiveness of different types of postoperative urinary catheterisation (suprapubic and intermittent self-catheterisation) remain unproven.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bladder dysfunction is a common complication following radical hysterectomy, caused by the damage to pelvic autonomic nerves that innervate the muscles of the bladder, urethral sphincter, and pelvic floor fasciae. Bladder dysfunction increases the rates of urinary tract infection, hospital visits or admission, and patient dissatisfaction. In addition, bladder dysfunction can also negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL). Several postoperative interventions have been proposed to prevent bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic review evaluating the effectiveness and safety of these interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA2 to IIA2).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 4) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to April week 2, 2020), and Embase via Ovid (1980 to 2020, week 16). We also checked registers of clinical trials, grey literature, conference reports, and citation lists of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of any type of postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction following a radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant RCTs, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, compared results, and made judgments on the quality and certainty of the evidence. We resolved any disagreements through discussion or consultation with a third review author. Outcomes of interest consisted of spontaneous voiding recovery one week after the operation, quality of life (QoL), adverse events, post-void residual urine volume one month after the operation, urinary tract infection over the one month following the operation, and subjective urinary symptoms.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 1464 records as a result of the search (excluding duplicates). Of the 20 records that potentially met the review criteria, we included five reports of four studies. Most of the studies had unclear risks of selection and reporting biases. Of the four studies, one compared bethanechol versus placebo and three studies compared suprapubic catheterisation with intermittent self-catheterisation. We identified two ongoing studies. Bethanechol versus placebo The study reported no information on the rate of spontaneous voiding recovery at one week following the operation, QoL, adverse events, urinary tract infection in the first month after surgery, and subjective urinary symptoms for this comparison. The volume of post-void residual urine, assessed at one month after surgery, among women receiving bethanechol was lower than those in the placebo group (mean difference (MD) -37.4 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60.35 to -14.45; one study, 39 participants; very-low certainty evidence). Suprapubic catheterisation versus intermittent self-catheterisation The studies reported no information on the rate of spontaneous voiding recovery at one week and post-void residual urine volume at one month following the operation for this comparison. There was no difference in risks of acute complication (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.49; one study, 71 participants; very low certainty evidence) and urinary tract infections during the first month after surgery (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.13; two studies, 95 participants; very- low certainty evidence) between participants who underwent suprapubic catheterisation and those who underwent intermittent self-catheterisation. Available data were insufficient to calculate the relative measures of the effect of interventions on QoL and subjective urinary symptoms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
None of the included studies reported rate of spontaneous voiding recovery one week after surgery, time to a post-void residual volume of urine of 50 mL or less, or post-void residual urine volume at 6 and 12 months after surgery, all of which are important outcomes for assessing postoperative bladder dysfunction. Limited evidence suggested that bethanechol may minimise the risk of bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy by lowering post-void residual urine volume. The certainty of this evidence, however, was very low. The effectiveness of different types of postoperative urinary catheterisation (suprapubic and intermittent self-catheterisation) remain unproven.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33491176
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012863.pub2
pmc: PMC8092645
doi:

Substances chimiques

Parasympathomimetics 0
Bethanechol 004F72P8F4

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD012863

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(24):10971-5
pubmed: 25605211
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD001308
pubmed: 14973967
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000 Jul;10(4):305-312
pubmed: 11240691
Lancet. 1997 Aug 23;350(9077):535-40
pubmed: 9284774
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Aug;102(2):256-62
pubmed: 16445968
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):95-101
pubmed: 19760355
Ann Oncol. 2009 Oct;20(10):1631-8
pubmed: 19556323
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Aug;44(2):265-72
pubmed: 4417035
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2007 Apr;32(2):132-5
pubmed: 17650660
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug 13;17(1):141
pubmed: 31409355
Dis Colon Rectum. 1967 Sep-Oct;10(5):379-83
pubmed: 6052916
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 May;85(2):292-7
pubmed: 11972390
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 12;2:CD012828
pubmed: 30746689
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S90-S98
pubmed: 29279881
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
J Cancer Res Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):938-44
pubmed: 27461678
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 May;17(3):248-52
pubmed: 15959612
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;(12):CD004203
pubmed: 26661940
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):416
pubmed: 28619043
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;32(5):329-36
pubmed: 16234728
Res Nurs Health. 1981 Mar;4(1):175-81
pubmed: 6908095
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8):1812-22
pubmed: 16977652
Cancer. 2014 Dec 15;120(24):3870-83
pubmed: 25056522
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1993 Jul;3(4):208-210
pubmed: 11578347
Chin J Integr Med. 2011 Nov;17(11):860-3
pubmed: 21809126
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Apr;34(4):309-15
pubmed: 24519734
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):564-571
pubmed: 32276941
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003 Dec;48(3):287-93
pubmed: 14693341
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 25;1:CD012863
pubmed: 33491176
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(8):1010-4
pubmed: 19260082
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Apr;26(7-8):1131-1136
pubmed: 27627789
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012;(208):375-400
pubmed: 22222707
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):883-8
pubmed: 25273982
Int J Urol. 2004 Feb;11(2):88-96
pubmed: 14706012
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8(3):138-41
pubmed: 9449585
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jan;80(1):3-12
pubmed: 11136561
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Nov;30(11):1034-1038
pubmed: 19126285
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;35(4):425-8
pubmed: 26043564
Br J Nurs. 2006 Oct 26-Nov 8;15(19):1038-44
pubmed: 17167363
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Nov;80(2):323-9
pubmed: 21277788
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 May;21(4):730-6
pubmed: 21546875
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5375-8
pubmed: 24175829
J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564
pubmed: 1279218
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49
pubmed: 12559262
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;30(3):294-8
pubmed: 20373935
Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Feb;11(2):110-7
pubmed: 24473416
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135
pubmed: 30656645
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):245-51
pubmed: 22209773
Urol Int. 2005;75(3):247-51
pubmed: 16215314
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:81
pubmed: 24059250
Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34
pubmed: 9921604
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):619.e1-619.e24
pubmed: 31288006
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):297-303
pubmed: 18308255
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Nov;63(2):169-74
pubmed: 9856324
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Nov;99(2):437-42
pubmed: 16083948
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 28;6:829-38
pubmed: 25210477
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(7):1753-6
pubmed: 22126559
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904
pubmed: 30380365
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002
pubmed: 21784880
Br J Cancer. 1993 Dec;68(6):1216-20
pubmed: 8260376
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Apiwat Aue-Aungkul (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Chumnan Kietpeerakool (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Siwanon Rattanakanokchai (S)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Khadra Galaal (K)

Gynaecological Oncology, Princess Alexandra Wing, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK.

Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Chetta Ngamjarus (C)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Pisake Lumbiganon (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH