Transcriptomic profiling of susceptible and resistant flax seedlings after Fusarium oxysporum lini infection.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
29
07
2020
accepted:
13
01
2021
entrez:
26
1
2021
pubmed:
27
1
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study transcriptome was analyzed on two fibrous varieties of flax: the susceptible Regina and the resistant Nike. The experiment was carried out on 2-week-old seedlings, because in this phase of development flax is the most susceptible to infection. We analyzed the whole seedlings, which allowed us to recognize the systemic response of the plants to the infection. We decided to analyze two time points: 24h and 48h, because our goal was to learn the mechanisms activated in the initial stages of infection, these points were selected based on the previous analysis of chitinase gene expression, whose increase in time of Fusarium oxysporum lini infection has been repeatedly confirmed both in the case of flax and other plant species. The results show that although qualitatively the responses of the two varieties are similar, it is the degree of the response that plays the role in the differences of their resistance to F. oxysporum.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33497403
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246052
pii: PONE-D-20-23624
pmc: PMC7837494
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0246052Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017 Jan;30(1):5-15
pubmed: 27925500
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020 Sep;33(9):1112-1115
pubmed: 32568599
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):373-8
pubmed: 16760490
Biochem J. 1997 Mar 15;322 ( Pt 3):681-92
pubmed: 9148737
Planta. 2020 Jan 16;251(2):50
pubmed: 31950395
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 12;8(1):2051
pubmed: 29233978
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Jan;44(1):304-322
pubmed: 32890441
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Dec 28;17(Suppl 2):253
pubmed: 29297347
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Dec;5(12):1636-7
pubmed: 21139431
Plant Physiol. 2016 Apr;170(4):2392-406
pubmed: 26869704
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jan 05;7:2139
pubmed: 28105028
Plant J. 2009 Feb;57(3):463-72
pubmed: 18826428
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Oct 23;7:753
pubmed: 25339126
Nat Protoc. 2016 Sep;11(9):1650-67
pubmed: 27560171
Plant J. 2012 Nov;72(3):461-73
pubmed: 22757964
Plant Cell. 2011 Aug;23(8):2809-20
pubmed: 21841124
Trop Life Sci Res. 2018 Jul;29(2):29-37
pubmed: 30112139
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Oct 05;14:261
pubmed: 25287293
J Plant Physiol. 2015 May 1;179:122-32
pubmed: 25867625
Mol Plant Pathol. 2017 Sep;18(7):1024-1035
pubmed: 28390170
Plant Signal Behav. 2006 May;1(3):96-104
pubmed: 19521489
GM Crops Food. 2021 Jan 2;12(1):125-144
pubmed: 33079628
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Nov;4(11):1024-7
pubmed: 19829075
Plant Physiol. 2019 May;180(1):26-38
pubmed: 30867331
J Plant Res. 2009 Sep;122(5):571-9
pubmed: 19449088
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Phytochemistry. 2008 Mar;69(5):1128-34
pubmed: 18226820
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 May 1;41(10):e108
pubmed: 23558742
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 20;7:1951
pubmed: 28163709
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Jul 27;3:208
pubmed: 20659347
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 18;8(1):10872
pubmed: 30022098
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Mar 26;14(4):6805-47
pubmed: 23531539
Plant Physiol. 2009 Aug;150(4):1648-55
pubmed: 19420325
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Mar 22;16:75
pubmed: 27005923
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 27;6:e5127
pubmed: 29967753
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 24;7:1766
pubmed: 27933082
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010 Nov;23(11):1470-85
pubmed: 20923353
J Plant Physiol. 2018 Feb;221:132-143
pubmed: 29277026
Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Aug;91(6):713-25
pubmed: 26879412