Rumor surveillance in support of minimally invasive tissue sampling for diagnosing the cause of child death in low-income countries: A qualitative study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
07
07
2020
accepted:
13
12
2020
entrez:
28
1
2021
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
5
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In low-and middle-income countries, determining the cause of death of any given individual is impaired by poor access to healthcare systems, resource-poor diagnostic facilities, and limited acceptance of complete diagnostic autopsies. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), an innovative post-mortem procedure based on obtaining tissue specimens using fine needle biopsies suitable for laboratory analysis, is an acceptable proxy of the complete diagnostic autopsy, and thus could reduce the uncertainty of cause of death. This study describes rumor surveillance activities developed and implemented in Bangladesh, Mali, and Mozambique to identify, track and understand rumors about the MITS procedure. Our surveillance activities included observations and interviews with stakeholders to understand how rumors are developed and spread and to anticipate rumors in the program areas. We also engaged young volunteers, local stakeholders, community leaders, and study staff to report rumors being spread in the community after MITS launch. Through community meetings, we also managed and responded to rumors. When a rumor was reported, the field team purposively conducted interviews and group discussions to track, verify and understand the rumor. From July 2016 through April 2018, the surveillance identified several rumors including suspicions of organs being harvested or transplanted; MITS having been performed on a living child, and concerns related to disrespecting the body and mistrust related to the study purpose. These rumors, concerns, and cues of mistrust were passed by word of mouth. We managed the rumors by modifying the consent protocol and giving additional information and support to the bereaved family and to the community members. Rumor surveillance was critical for anticipating and readily identifying rumors and managing them. Setting up rumor surveillance by engaging community residents, stakeholders, and volunteers could be an essential part of any public health program where there is a need to identify and react in real-time to public concern.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33507902
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244552
pii: PONE-D-20-21067
pmc: PMC7842994
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0244552Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 2005 Aug 20-26;366(9486):682-6
pubmed: 16112306
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S280-S290
pubmed: 31598665
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002172
pubmed: 27875532
J Clin Pathol. 2011 May;64(5):412-4
pubmed: 21385895
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar;4(3):e73
pubmed: 17388657
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jun;84(6):463-7
pubmed: 11369557
Science. 2012 Jun 15;336(6087):1372-4
pubmed: 22700899
Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1045-9
pubmed: 16168787
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2015 Jun 26;6(2):3-6
pubmed: 26306208
Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Apr;21(2):67-73
pubmed: 25995958
J Health Soc Behav. 1995;Spec No:34-52
pubmed: 7560848
Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1235-7
pubmed: 16198772
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S262-S273
pubmed: 31598664
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002171
pubmed: 27875530
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-4
pubmed: 21991941
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Aug 01;9:25
pubmed: 21806831
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Oct 18;28:150
pubmed: 29541298
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Jun;14(2):152-63
pubmed: 10538718
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S291-S301
pubmed: 31598657
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1990 Mar;11(1):1-8
pubmed: 2305750
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S302-S310
pubmed: 31598667
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 13;12:10
pubmed: 21668979
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Aug;16(8):1015-8
pubmed: 21564428
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 04;11(3):e0150989
pubmed: 26943909
Lancet. 2005 Sep 24-30;366(9491):1132-5
pubmed: 16182902
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0132057
pubmed: 26126191
J Med Ethics. 1993 Sep;19(3):164-8
pubmed: 8230149
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Jan;133(1):78-82
pubmed: 19123741
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230322
pubmed: 32182277
Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):897-904
pubmed: 19244053
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 21;14(8):e0220583
pubmed: 31433821
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200058
pubmed: 29979720
Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):774-9
pubmed: 16125596
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):1109-20
pubmed: 16630676
Pediatr Rev. 2016 Jul;37(7):279-91
pubmed: 27368359
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1621-1629
pubmed: 32783794
Am J Public Health. 2005 May;95(5):773-7
pubmed: 15855451
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):1140
pubmed: 27821112
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jul;11(7):975-82
pubmed: 16827698
Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(1):179
pubmed: 30348179