Genome-wide DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the porcine germline.


Journal

Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 02 2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2020
accepted: 04 01 2021
entrez: 4 2 2021
pubmed: 5 2 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prior work in mice has shown that some retrotransposed elements remain substantially methylated during DNA methylation reprogramming of germ cells. In the pig, however, information about this process is scarce. The present study was designed to examine the methylation profiles of porcine germ cells during the time course of epigenetic reprogramming. Sows were artificially inseminated, and their fetuses were collected 28, 32, 36, 39, and 42 days later. At each time point, genital ridges were dissected from the mesonephros and germ cells were isolated through magnetic-activated cell sorting using an anti-SSEA-1 antibody, and recovered germ cells were subjected to whole-genome bisulphite sequencing. Methylation levels were quantified using SeqMonk software by performing an unbiased analysis, and persistently methylated regions (PMRs) in each sex were determined to extract those regions showing 50% or more methylation. Most genomic elements underwent a dramatic loss of methylation from day 28 to day 36, when the lowest levels were shown. By day 42, there was evidence for the initiation of genomic re-methylation. We identified a total of 1456 and 1122 PMRs in male and female germ cells, respectively, and large numbers of transposable elements (SINEs, LINEs, and LTRs) were found to be located within these PMRs. Twenty-one percent of the introns located in these PMRs were found to be the first introns of a gene, suggesting their regulatory role in the expression of these genes. Interestingly, most of the identified PMRs were demethylated at the blastocyst stage. Our findings indicate that methylation reprogramming in pig germ cells follows the general dynamics shown in mice and human, unveiling genomic elements that behave differently between male and female germ cells.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prior work in mice has shown that some retrotransposed elements remain substantially methylated during DNA methylation reprogramming of germ cells. In the pig, however, information about this process is scarce. The present study was designed to examine the methylation profiles of porcine germ cells during the time course of epigenetic reprogramming.
RESULTS
Sows were artificially inseminated, and their fetuses were collected 28, 32, 36, 39, and 42 days later. At each time point, genital ridges were dissected from the mesonephros and germ cells were isolated through magnetic-activated cell sorting using an anti-SSEA-1 antibody, and recovered germ cells were subjected to whole-genome bisulphite sequencing. Methylation levels were quantified using SeqMonk software by performing an unbiased analysis, and persistently methylated regions (PMRs) in each sex were determined to extract those regions showing 50% or more methylation. Most genomic elements underwent a dramatic loss of methylation from day 28 to day 36, when the lowest levels were shown. By day 42, there was evidence for the initiation of genomic re-methylation. We identified a total of 1456 and 1122 PMRs in male and female germ cells, respectively, and large numbers of transposable elements (SINEs, LINEs, and LTRs) were found to be located within these PMRs. Twenty-one percent of the introns located in these PMRs were found to be the first introns of a gene, suggesting their regulatory role in the expression of these genes. Interestingly, most of the identified PMRs were demethylated at the blastocyst stage.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that methylation reprogramming in pig germ cells follows the general dynamics shown in mice and human, unveiling genomic elements that behave differently between male and female germ cells.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33536045
doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01003-x
pii: 10.1186/s13148-021-01003-x
pmc: PMC7860200
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

27

Références

Biol Reprod. 2020 Feb 12;102(1):38-52
pubmed: 31504197
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2016 Jun 20;54:1.30.1-1.30.33
pubmed: 27322403
Nat Genet. 2017 Jul;49(7):1148-1151
pubmed: 28553959
Development. 2012 Oct;139(19):3623-32
pubmed: 22949617
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2018 Jun 29;11(1):37
pubmed: 29958539
Reproduction. 2010 Jun;139(6):943-58
pubmed: 20395427
Genomics Inform. 2015 Dec;13(4):112-8
pubmed: 26865841
Mol Cell. 2012 Dec 28;48(6):849-62
pubmed: 23219530
Nature. 2018 Mar 15;555(7696):392-396
pubmed: 29513657
Science. 2010 Jul 2;329(5987):78-82
pubmed: 20595612
Biol Reprod. 2014 Jul;91(1):19
pubmed: 24899574
Microsc Microanal. 2011 Jun;17(3):431-9
pubmed: 21600073
Mol Reprod Dev. 2003 May;65(1):41-50
pubmed: 12658632
Nat Genet. 2002 Apr;30(4):446-9
pubmed: 11912493
Genesis. 2003 Feb;35(2):88-93
pubmed: 12533790
Physiol Genomics. 2008 Jan 17;32(2):264-72
pubmed: 17986520
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D745-D751
pubmed: 30407521
Cell. 2015 Jun 4;161(6):1437-52
pubmed: 26046443
BMC Dev Biol. 2011 Feb 25;11:11
pubmed: 21352525
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015 Jan 09;8(1):1
pubmed: 25621012
Clin Epigenetics. 2020 May 11;12(1):64
pubmed: 32393379
Biol Reprod. 2011 Jun;84(6):1087-93
pubmed: 21293033
Genome Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):633-41
pubmed: 22357612
Nature. 2015 Jan 22;517(7535):466-71
pubmed: 25533956
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Sep 1;40(17):e136
pubmed: 22649061
Mech Dev. 2002 Sep;117(1-2):15-23
pubmed: 12204247
Nature. 2014 Jul 31;511(7511):606-10
pubmed: 25079557
Science. 2013 Jan 25;339(6118):448-52
pubmed: 23223451
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):258-269
pubmed: 29237021
Cell. 2015 Jun 4;161(6):1453-67
pubmed: 26046444
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D158-D169
pubmed: 27899622
Mol Biol Cell. 2020 Jun 1;31(12):1206-1217
pubmed: 32267211
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Feb;9(2):129-40
pubmed: 18197165
FASEB J. 2019 Aug;33(8):9638-9655
pubmed: 31145867
EMBO J. 2007 Jul 25;26(14):3346-59
pubmed: 17599069
Science. 2001 Aug 10;293(5532):1089-93
pubmed: 11498579
Elife. 2019 Apr 23;8:
pubmed: 31012843
Cell Cycle. 2008 Nov 15;7(22):3509-13
pubmed: 19001847
Elife. 2017 Feb 01;6:
pubmed: 28134613
BMC Genomics. 2019 Mar 12;20(1):202
pubmed: 30871468
Cell Stem Cell. 2017 Jun 1;20(6):858-873.e4
pubmed: 28457750
Cell. 2014 Mar 27;157(1):95-109
pubmed: 24679529
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Feb;18(2):71-86
pubmed: 27867194
Trends Genet. 2012 Jan;28(1):33-42
pubmed: 22019337
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 29;10(1):3387
pubmed: 31358751
Anat Rec. 1968 May;161(1):45-55
pubmed: 5664085
Mob DNA. 2019 May 6;10:19
pubmed: 31080521
Vet Pathol. 2012 Mar;49(2):344-56
pubmed: 21441112
BMC Genomics. 2005 May 10;6:70
pubmed: 15885146
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar;14(3):204-20
pubmed: 23400093
Biol Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;97(2):189-196
pubmed: 29044423
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 29;13(7):484-92
pubmed: 22641018
Cell. 2015 Jun 4;161(6):1425-36
pubmed: 26004067

Auteurs

Isabel Gómez-Redondo (I)

Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain. igomer00@gmail.com.

Benjamín Planells (B)

Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain.

Sebastián Cánovas (S)

Physiology of Reproduction Group, Department of Physiology, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain.
Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, IMIB-Arrixaca-UMU, Murcia, Spain.

Elena Ivanova (E)

Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.

Gavin Kelsey (G)

Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán (A)

Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH