Color-coded summation images in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Color-coded
Digital subtraction angiography
Endovascular
PTA
Renal artery
Journal
BMC medical imaging
ISSN: 1471-2342
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 02 2021
10 02 2021
Historique:
received:
24
10
2020
accepted:
20
12
2020
entrez:
11
2
2021
pubmed:
12
2
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endovascular therapy is the gold standard in patients with hemodynamic relevant renal artery stenosis (RAS) resistant to medical therapy. The severity grading of the stenosis as well as the result assessment after endovascular approach is predominantly based on visible estimations of the anatomic appearance. We aim to investigate the application of color-coded DSA parameters to gain hemodynamic information during endovascular renal artery interventions and for the assessment of the procedures´ technical success. We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients who underwent endovascular renal artery revascularization and applied color-coded summation imaging on selected monochromatic DSA images. The differences in time to peak (dTTP) of contrast enhancement in predefined anatomical measuring points were analyzed. Furthermore, differences in systolic blood pressure values (SBP) and serum creatinine were obtained. The value of underlying diabetes mellitus as a predictor for clinical outcome was assessed. Correlation analysis between the patients´ gender as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus and dTTP was performed. Endovascular revascularization resulted in statistically significant improvement in 4/7 regions of interest. Highly significant improvement of perfusion in terms of shortened TTP values could be found at the segmental artery level and in the intrastenotical segment (p < 0.001), significant improvement prestenotical and in the apical renal parenchyma (p < 0.05). In the other anatomic regions, differences revealed not to be significant. Differences between SBP and serum creatinine levels before and after the procedure were significant (p = 0.004 and 0.0004). Patients´ gender as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus did not reveal to be predictors for the clinical success of the procedure. Furthermore, diabetes and gender did not show relevant correlation with dTTP in the parenchymal measuring points. The supplementary use of color-coding DSA and the data gained from parametric images may provide helpful information in the evaluation of the procedures´ technical success. The segmental artery might be a particularly suitable vascular territory for analyzing differences in blood flow characteristics. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to further confirm the diagnostic value of this technique.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Endovascular therapy is the gold standard in patients with hemodynamic relevant renal artery stenosis (RAS) resistant to medical therapy. The severity grading of the stenosis as well as the result assessment after endovascular approach is predominantly based on visible estimations of the anatomic appearance. We aim to investigate the application of color-coded DSA parameters to gain hemodynamic information during endovascular renal artery interventions and for the assessment of the procedures´ technical success.
METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients who underwent endovascular renal artery revascularization and applied color-coded summation imaging on selected monochromatic DSA images. The differences in time to peak (dTTP) of contrast enhancement in predefined anatomical measuring points were analyzed. Furthermore, differences in systolic blood pressure values (SBP) and serum creatinine were obtained. The value of underlying diabetes mellitus as a predictor for clinical outcome was assessed. Correlation analysis between the patients´ gender as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus and dTTP was performed.
RESULTS
Endovascular revascularization resulted in statistically significant improvement in 4/7 regions of interest. Highly significant improvement of perfusion in terms of shortened TTP values could be found at the segmental artery level and in the intrastenotical segment (p < 0.001), significant improvement prestenotical and in the apical renal parenchyma (p < 0.05). In the other anatomic regions, differences revealed not to be significant. Differences between SBP and serum creatinine levels before and after the procedure were significant (p = 0.004 and 0.0004). Patients´ gender as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus did not reveal to be predictors for the clinical success of the procedure. Furthermore, diabetes and gender did not show relevant correlation with dTTP in the parenchymal measuring points.
CONCLUSIONS
The supplementary use of color-coding DSA and the data gained from parametric images may provide helpful information in the evaluation of the procedures´ technical success. The segmental artery might be a particularly suitable vascular territory for analyzing differences in blood flow characteristics. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to further confirm the diagnostic value of this technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33568089
doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00540-w
pii: 10.1186/s12880-020-00540-w
pmc: PMC7874657
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21Références
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):1953-62
pubmed: 19907042
Clin Radiol. 2002 Jul;57(7):617-24
pubmed: 12096862
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):28-35
pubmed: 33170103
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25;12(6):505-517
pubmed: 30898248
Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):586-96
pubmed: 16436819
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):13-22
pubmed: 24245566
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 May;31(5):919-24
pubmed: 20167651
Clin Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun;23(2):113-20
pubmed: 23241650
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1910-1
pubmed: 16217340
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):421-30; quiz 230
pubmed: 20188590
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Jun 19;19:475-82
pubmed: 23778330
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;42(4):110-135
pubmed: 28325353
Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):547-55
pubmed: 26017736
Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 Oct;24(4):695-9
pubmed: 7942830
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):785-90
pubmed: 21798691
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 01;165(9):635-649
pubmed: 27536808
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1147-1154
pubmed: 28488106
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;9(4):553-9
pubmed: 9684822
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;49(4):465-73
pubmed: 25725508
Radiology. 1996 Jun;199(3):637-40
pubmed: 8637979
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2010 Mar;6(2):88-101
pubmed: 20034365
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):67
pubmed: 32552680
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):28
pubmed: 30219054
Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):266-73
pubmed: 21813739
J Chin Med Assoc. 2013 Apr;76(4):218-24
pubmed: 23557889
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;50(2):136-50
pubmed: 17765475
Vascular. 2017 Dec;25(6):618-628
pubmed: 28782453
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Apr;64(4):480-6
pubmed: 15789382
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Mar;37(3):243-50
pubmed: 8974797
MAGMA. 2020 Feb;33(1):3-21
pubmed: 31422518
Radiology. 1992 Aug;184(2):487-92
pubmed: 1620853