Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Cellular Populations of the Central Nervous System: The Influence of Donor Age.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
/ immunology
Animals
Apoptosis
/ immunology
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Proliferation
Cerebral Cortex
/ cytology
Chemokine CCL11
/ metabolism
Female
Humans
Inflammation Mediators
/ metabolism
Male
Mice
Microglia
/ cytology
Neural Stem Cells
/ immunology
Neurogenesis
/ immunology
Neurons
/ immunology
Platelet-Rich Plasma
/ cytology
Primary Cell Culture
Rats
Synapses
/ immunology
Young Adult
aging
central nervous system
growth factors
microglia
neurons
platelet-rich plasma
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2021
09 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
24
11
2020
revised:
12
01
2021
accepted:
03
02
2021
entrez:
12
2
2021
pubmed:
13
2
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a biologic therapy that promotes healing responses across multiple medical fields, including the central nervous system (CNS). The efficacy of this therapy depends on several factors such as the donor's health status and age. This work aims to prove the effect of PRP on cellular models of the CNS, considering the differences between PRP from young and elderly donors. Two different PRP pools were prepared from donors 65‒85 and 20‒25 years old. The cellular and molecular composition of both PRPs were analyzed. Subsequently, the cellular response was evaluated in CNS in vitro models, studying proliferation, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and inflammation. While no differences in the cellular composition of PRPs were found, the molecular composition of the Young PRP showed lower levels of inflammatory molecules such as CCL-11, as well as the presence of other factors not found in Aged PRP (GDF-11). Although both PRPs had effects in terms of reducing neural progenitor cell apoptosis, stabilizing neuronal synapses, and decreasing inflammation in the microglia, the effect of the Young PRP was more pronounced. In conclusion, the molecular composition of the PRP, conditioned by the age of the donors, affects the magnitude of the biological response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33572157
pii: ijms22041725
doi: 10.3390/ijms22041725
pmc: PMC7915891
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CCL11 protein, human
0
Chemokine CCL11
0
Inflammation Mediators
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Basque Government
ID : GAITEK
Organisme : Spanish Ministry of Education and Science
ID : PID2019-109724RB-I00
Organisme : Basque Government
ID : (IT1203/19 and KK-2020/00034
Organisme : Provincial Council of Alava
ID : AlavaInnova Program
Références
Development. 2017 Jul 1;144(13):2445-2455
pubmed: 28533206
EMBO Rep. 2015 Apr;16(4):416-26
pubmed: 25739812
J Immunol. 2007 May 15;178(10):6549-56
pubmed: 17475885
Clin Sports Med. 2019 Jan;38(1):17-44
pubmed: 30466721
J Immunol Methods. 2015 Oct;425:58-61
pubmed: 26080062
J Neurochem. 2009 Mar;108(6):1343-59
pubmed: 19154336
Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2014 Apr 14;106:28.4.1-14
pubmed: 24733240
Neuroscientist. 2017 Feb;23(1):27-39
pubmed: 26659565
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016 Nov;5(11):1538-1549
pubmed: 27400795
Exp Cell Res. 2017 Mar 1;352(1):146-156
pubmed: 28202394
J Anat. 2003 Sep;203(3):339-44
pubmed: 14529051
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Dec;73(6):1038-40
pubmed: 19767153
J Orthop Res. 2019 Aug;37(8):1760-1770
pubmed: 31042308
Cell Calcium. 2010 Mar;47(3):264-72
pubmed: 20061018
Platelets. 2019;30(6):773-792
pubmed: 30252623
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 19;8(9):e73118
pubmed: 24069173
J Neurochem. 2001 Jul;78(2):265-75
pubmed: 11461962
Front Cell Neurosci. 2018 Dec 18;12:488
pubmed: 30618635
Mil Med. 2014 Jul;179(7):799-805
pubmed: 25003868
Front Neurosci. 2018 Apr 23;12:252
pubmed: 29740270
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1980-1986
pubmed: 29772187
BMC Biol. 2020 Apr 22;18(1):42
pubmed: 32321486
Neurobiol Dis. 2005 Nov;20(2):187-98
pubmed: 16242627
Front Chem. 2017 Oct 31;5:89
pubmed: 29164105
Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Jun;34(6):1610-20
pubmed: 23481567
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018 Jan;94:56-60
pubmed: 29197626
Biomed Res Int. 2020 May 9;2020:4671989
pubmed: 32461990
Prog Neurobiol. 2014 May;116:1-12
pubmed: 24380784
Int J Neurosci. 2011 Apr;121(4):176-80
pubmed: 21244302
J Orthop Res. 2020 Sep;38(9):1931-1941
pubmed: 32129513
Int J Neurosci. 2013 Mar;123(3):184-90
pubmed: 23126279
Nat Med. 2014 Jun;20(6):659-63
pubmed: 24793238
Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 Mar;24(5-6):493-501
pubmed: 28610547
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017 Feb;17(2):197-212
pubmed: 27845852
Cell Biol Int. 2020 Oct;44(10):2120-2130
pubmed: 32662922
J Control Release. 2015 Apr 10;203:170-80
pubmed: 25702964
Neuron. 2001 Jul 19;31(1):115-30
pubmed: 11498055
Arthroscopy. 2012 Aug;28(8):1070-8
pubmed: 22840987
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 May;10(5):428-36
pubmed: 23723151
Brain Behav Immun. 2006 Jan;20(1):57-63
pubmed: 16364817
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Dec;20(12):1447-1460
pubmed: 32692595
Nature. 2011 Aug 31;477(7362):90-4
pubmed: 21886162