Genetic and epigenetic variation in transposable element expression responses to abiotic stress in maize.


Journal

Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 05 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2020
accepted: 05 02 2021
pubmed: 17 2 2021
medline: 19 2 2022
entrez: 16 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Transposable elements (TEs) pervade most eukaryotic genomes. The repetitive nature of TEs complicates the analysis of their expression. Evaluation of the expression of both TE families (using unique and multi-mapping reads) and specific elements (using uniquely mapping reads) in leaf tissue of three maize (Zea mays) inbred lines subjected to heat or cold stress reveals no evidence for genome-wide activation of TEs; however, some specific TE families generate transcripts only in stress conditions. There is substantial variation for which TE families exhibit stress-responsive expression in the different genotypes. In order to understand the factors that drive expression of TEs, we focused on a subset of families in which we could monitor expression of individual elements. The stress-responsive activation of a TE family can often be attributed to a small number of elements in the family that contains regions lacking DNA methylation. Comparisons of the expression of TEs in different genotypes revealed both genetic and epigenetic variation. Many of the specific TEs that are activated in stress in one inbred are not present in the other inbred, explaining the lack of activation. Among the elements that are shared in both genomes but only expressed in one genotype, we found that many exhibit differences in DNA methylation such that the genotype without expression is fully methylated. This study provides insights into the regulation of expression of TEs in normal and stress conditions and highlights the role of chromatin variation between elements in a family or between genotypes for contributing to expression variation. The highly repetitive nature of many TEs complicates the analysis of their expression. Although most TEs are not expressed, some exhibits expression in certain tissues or conditions. We monitored the expression of both TE families (using unique and multi-mapping reads) and specific elements (using uniquely mapping reads) in leaf tissue of three maize (Zea mays) inbred lines subjected to heat or cold stress. While genome-wide activation of TEs did not occur, some TE families generated transcripts only in stress conditions with variation by genotype. To better understand the factors that drive expression of TEs, we focused on a subset of families in which we could monitor expression of individual elements. In most cases, stress-responsive activation of a TE family was attributed to a small number of elements in the family. The elements that contained small regions lacking DNA methylation regions showed enriched expression while fully methylated elements were rarely expressed in control or stress conditions. The cause of varied expression in the different genotypes was due to both genetic and epigenetic variation. Many specific TEs activated by stress in one inbred were not present in the other inbred. Among the elements shared in both genomes, full methylation inhibited expression in one of the genotypes. This study provides insights into the regulation of TE expression in normal and stress conditions and highlights the role of chromatin variation between elements in a family or between genotypes for contributing to expression.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33591319
pii: 6137849
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab073
pmc: PMC8154091
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA Transposable Elements 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

420-433

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Zhikai Liang (Z)

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Sarah N Anderson (SN)

Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Jaclyn M Noshay (JM)

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Peter A Crisp (PA)

School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Tara A Enders (TA)

Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Nathan M Springer (NM)

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Articles similaires

Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Eimeria tenella Animals Antigens, Protozoan Chickens Genetic Variation

Classifications MeSH