Genomic characterisation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.


Journal

Pathology
ISSN: 1465-3931
Titre abrégé: Pathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0175411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 29 10 2020
revised: 19 12 2020
accepted: 23 12 2020
pubmed: 2 3 2021
medline: 11 11 2021
entrez: 1 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a genomically heterogenous disease comprised of many subtypes that display significantly different clinical outcomes, in the context of treatment with conventional immunochemotherapy. Poor clinical outcomes in some subtypes, and imperfect identification of high risk individuals in otherwise low risk subgroups, demonstrate there is room for improvement in the subclassification and risk stratification of DLBCL. In addition, more comprehensive profiling may lead to improved molecular testing guided treatment selection. Existing characterisation and risk stratification strategies, such as division of DLBCL into activated B-cell (ABC) and germinal centre B-cell (GCB) subtypes, although prognostically useful, may oversimplify the underlying biology and have proven to be less useful in improving therapy selection. Several groups have proposed more predictive molecular testing based prognostic models with potentially more relevance to therapy choice. These alternative approaches use more resource intensive comprehensive genomic profiling strategies which present practical challenges to implement in diagnostic laboratories. The addition of genomic testing to the subclassification of DLBCL shows promise, but laboratories must identify testing strategies relevant to clinical practice. A consensus on optimal molecular profiling techniques is yet to be achieved. In this article we review various next generation sequencing-based analytical techniques and molecular classification models proposed recently. Emerging therapeutics where molecular profiling may guide patient selection are also reviewed. The potential utility of genomic testing in DLBCL is discussed, in addition to practical considerations when considering introducing genomics into the diagnostic laboratory.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33642095
pii: S0031-3025(21)00043-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2020.12.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

367-376

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Francesca Harrington (F)

Diagnostic Genetics, LabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, New Zealand. Electronic address: Francesca.harrington@doctors.org.uk.

Mark Greenslade (M)

Diagnostic Genetics, LabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, New Zealand.

Dipti Talaulikar (D)

Department of Haematology, Canberra Hospital, ACT, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Greg Corboy (G)

Diagnostic Genetics, LabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH