Quantitative imaging metrics derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting using ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom: An international multicenter repeatability and reproducibility study.

Benchmarking Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Phantoms, Imaging Reproducibility of Results
T1 and T2 relaxation multicenter study quantitative MRI quantitative imaging biomarker repeatability reproducibility

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
revised: 04 02 2021
received: 07 10 2020
accepted: 23 02 2021
pubmed: 11 3 2021
medline: 25 5 2021
entrez: 10 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the bias and inherent reliability of the quantitative (T ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom provides standard reference T For the wide ranges of MRF estimated T This study shows that MRF is highly repeatable (wCV <4% for T

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1002/mp.14833 PMID: 33690905 PMC: PMC9284672
pubmed: 33690905
doi: 10.1002/mp.14833
pmc: PMC9284672
mid: NIHMS1820688
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2438-2447

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA211205
Pays : United States
Organisme : GE Healthcare-Columbia Radiology MR Research Partnership Program
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA211205
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Magn Reson Med. 2008 Aug;60(2):496-501
pubmed: 18666108
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Apr;51(4):661-7
pubmed: 15065237
J Neurol. 2008 Mar;255 Suppl 1:61-74
pubmed: 18317678
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jan;53(1):237-41
pubmed: 15690526
Radiology. 2016 Apr;279(1):278-86
pubmed: 26794935
Angiogenesis. 2015 Apr;18(2):125-36
pubmed: 25408417
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul;52(1):141-6
pubmed: 15236377
Magn Reson Imaging. 1987;5(3):189-99
pubmed: 3041151
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;46(5):1485-1490
pubmed: 28240801
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):25-46
pubmed: 30277265
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Sep;80(3):885-894
pubmed: 29624736
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Aug;60(2):320-9
pubmed: 18666127
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):813-25
pubmed: 26267831
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Mar;57(3):528-37
pubmed: 17326183
Magn Reson Med. 2000 May;43(5):682-90
pubmed: 10800033
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93
pubmed: 12858311
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Mar;49(3):515-26
pubmed: 12594755
Nature. 2013 Mar 14;495(7440):187-92
pubmed: 23486058
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 16;7:12445
pubmed: 27526996
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Jan;37(1):34-43
pubmed: 8978630
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e26-e39
pubmed: 30680836
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Oct;76(4):1127-35
pubmed: 26509746
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Mar;55(3):566-74
pubmed: 16450365
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Dec;74(6):1621-31
pubmed: 25491018
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:362-372
pubmed: 30923028
Radiology. 1992 Sep;184(3):635-9
pubmed: 1509044
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2009 Nov-Dec;4(6):312-21
pubmed: 19998320
Invest Radiol. 2019 Mar;54(3):146-152
pubmed: 30394962
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):212-25
pubmed: 20008843
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):512-20
pubmed: 20211271
Radiology. 1999 May;211(2):489-95
pubmed: 10228533
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;84(9):719-23
pubmed: 16141752
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jan;51(1):194-9
pubmed: 14705061
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Oct;78(4):1452-1457
pubmed: 27790751
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020 Aug 3;19(3):168-175
pubmed: 31217366
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):48-61
pubmed: 29083101
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):571-8
pubmed: 11822790
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Apr;9(4):531-8
pubmed: 10232510
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 09;8(9):e73990
pubmed: 24040139
Magn Reson Med. 1987 Nov;5(5):399-416
pubmed: 3431401
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992 Sep-Oct;2(5):541-53
pubmed: 1392247
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Feb;24(1):9-26
pubmed: 24919826
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Dec;33(12):2311-22
pubmed: 25029380
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Feb;27(2):376-90
pubmed: 18219673
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 15;182:294-303
pubmed: 28583883

Auteurs

Amaresha Shridhar Konar (A)

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Enlin Qian (E)

Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Sairam Geethanath (S)

Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Guido Buonincontri (G)

Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.

Nancy A Obuchowski (NA)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Maggie Fung (M)

GE Healthcare, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Pedro Gomez (P)

Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, BY, 85748, Germany.

Rolf Schulte (R)

GE Healthcare, Munich, BY, 80807, Germany.

Matteo Cencini (M)

Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.

Michela Tosetti (M)

Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.

Lawrence H Schwartz (LH)

Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Amita Shukla-Dave (A)

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Articles similaires

Pulmonary Atelectasis After Sedation With Propofol vs Propofol-Ketamine for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yu Jeong Bang, Jeayoun Kim, Nam-Su Gil et al.
1.00
Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female

Customization of neonatal functional magnetic resonance imaging: A preclinical phantom-based study.

Juan F Quinones, Tina Schmitt, Tommaso Pavan et al.
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio

Relative victimization scale: initial development and retrospective reports of the impact on mental health.

Hacer Belen
1.00
Humans Male Crime Victims Female Bullying

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Sinhala version of the spiritual needs assessment for patients (S-SNAP) questionnaire.

Udayangani Ramadasa, Shehan Silva, Suraj Perera et al.
1.00
Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Qualité, accès, évaluation des soins de santé › Qualité des soins de santé › Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé › Évaluation de programme › Référenciation › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...
questionsmedicales.fr › Sciences de l'information › Méthodologies informatiques › Traitement d'image par ordinateur › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...
questionsmedicales.fr › Diagnostic › Techniques et procédures diagnostiques › Imagerie diagnostique › Tomographie › Imagerie par résonance magnétique › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...
questionsmedicales.fr › Techniques d'investigation › Techniques de chimie analytique › Analyse spectrale › Spectroscopie par résonance magnétique › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...
questionsmedicales.fr › Équipement et fournitures › Fantômes en imagerie › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique › Reproductibilité des résultats › Quantitative imaging metrics derived from...