Estimating copy number using next-generation sequencing to determine ERBB2 amplification status.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Female
Gene Amplification
/ genetics
Gene Dosage
Genetic Testing
/ standards
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Breast cancer
ERBB2
Gene copy number
Immunohistochemistry
Next-generation sequencing
Journal
Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England)
ISSN: 1559-131X
Titre abrégé: Med Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9435512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2021
12 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
03
01
2021
accepted:
13
02
2021
entrez:
12
3
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Assessing Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) amplification status in breast and gastric cancer is necessary for deciding the best therapeutic strategy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are currently used for assessing protein levels and gene copy number (CN), respectively. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to measure ERBB2 CN in breast cancer is approved by the United States Federal Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic. However, a CN of less than 8 is evaluated as "equivocal", which means that some ERBB2 amplification cases diagnosed as "HER2 negative" might be false-negative cases. We reviewed the results of gene profiling targeting 160 cancer-related genes in breast (N = 90) and non-breast (N = 19) cancer tissue, and compared the ERBB2 CN results with the IHC/FISH scores. We obtained an estimated CN from the measured CN by factoring in the histological proportion of tumor cells and found that an ERBB2-estimated CN of 3.2 or higher was concordant with the combined IHC/FISH outcome in 98.4% (88/90) of breast cancer cases, while this was not always evident among non-breast cancer cases. Therefore, NGS-estimated ERBB2 CN could be considered a diagnostic test for anti-HER2 therapy after the completion of adequate prospective clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33710417
doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01482-1
pii: 10.1007/s12032-021-01482-1
pmc: PMC7954749
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
36Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 20K18232
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP20mk0102145
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 20ck0106448h0003
Références
BMC Cancer. 2009 Dec 10;9:433
pubmed: 20003286
Genomics. 1989 Apr;4(3):362-6
pubmed: 2565881
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Apr 9;4:
pubmed: 32923896
Carcinogenesis. 2019 Nov 25;40(11):1308-1319
pubmed: 31241739
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jan;108(1):3-9
pubmed: 17945336
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Jan;135(1):55-62
pubmed: 21204711
JAMA. 2014 May 21;311(19):1998-2006
pubmed: 24846037
Science. 1985 Dec 6;230(4730):1132-9
pubmed: 2999974
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):128-31
pubmed: 18555254
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 15;344(11):783-92
pubmed: 11248153
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97
pubmed: 20728210
Histopathology. 2008 Jun;52(7):797-805
pubmed: 18422971
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 01;12(4):e1004827
pubmed: 27035903
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1;9(10 Pt 1):3645-52
pubmed: 14506153
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 03;10(4):
pubmed: 32260152
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2105-2122
pubmed: 29846122
Ann Oncol. 2004 Jan;15(1):19-27
pubmed: 14679114
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 1;9(14):5238-43
pubmed: 14614004
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Mar;19(2):244-254
pubmed: 28027945
Cancer Treat Rev. 2006 May;32(3):180-90
pubmed: 16483720