Multicentre Study on the Efficacy of Brachial Artery Transposition Among Haemodialysis Patients.
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
/ adverse effects
Brachial Artery
/ surgery
Catheterization, Central Venous
/ methods
Female
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic
/ therapy
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
/ classification
Renal Dialysis
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Upper Extremity
/ blood supply
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Brachial artery superficialisation
Brachial artery transposition
Haemodialysis
Vascular access
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
28
04
2019
revised:
10
12
2020
accepted:
19
01
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Brachial artery transposition (BAT) is not a well known method for obtaining vascular access (VA) for maintenance haemodialysis. This study evaluated the outcomes of BAT. This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 233 consecutive patients who underwent BAT between January 2012 and December 2013. The indications were inadequate vessels for obtaining VA, severe heart failure, hand ischaemia, central vein stenosis/occlusion, or a history of catheter/graft infection. The transposed brachial artery was used only for arterial inflow and other routes were used for outflow. BAT was successful in 227 patients, and adequate blood flow was achieved during dialysis sessions. The first successful cannulation was after a median of 18 days. BAT was performed using superficial veins as the return route in 127 patients and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in 63 patients to prevent maturation failure. In 41 patients with central venous catheterisation, the transposed brachial artery was used for arterial inflow. The complications of BAT were impaired wound healing in 14 patients, including skin necrosis in two; large aneurysms in six, including a mycotic pseudo-aneurysm in one; arterial thrombosis in five; hand ischaemia in five; lymphorrhoea in four; and haematoma/bleeding in three. The transposed brachial artery was abandoned in four, three, three, and one case of arterial thrombosis/stenosis, haematoma/bleeding, skin necrosis, and large aneurysm, respectively. Access to the return routes failed in 48 cases because of vein damage caused by cannulation in 22, AVF thrombosis/stenosis in 14, catheter infection in six, and catheter occlusion in six. At two years, the primary patency rates of the transposed brachial artery and access circuit were 88% and 54%, respectively. BAT is a safe and effective technique. The patency was high for the transposed brachial artery but adequate for the access circuit. BAT can be considered for patients with an unobtainable standard arteriovenous access.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33716008
pii: S1078-5884(21)00089-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.038
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
998-1006Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.