Efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of unipolar major depression: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses of double-blind randomised controlled trials.
Antidepressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
/ administration & dosage
Depressive Disorder, Major
/ drug therapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Interactions
Female
Humans
Male
Neuromuscular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sex Factors
OnabotulinumtoxinA
double-blind randomised controlled trial
major depression
meta-analysis
Journal
Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1461-7285
Titre abrégé: J Psychopharmacol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8907828
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
3
2
2022
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
OnabotulinumtoxinA is a novel therapeutic intervention whose mechanism of action is believed to modify the negative facial feedback, thus abating symptoms of depression. This putative new antidepressant agent offers minimal systemic side effects and negligible risk of pharmacological interactions. We set out to examine the evidence for the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in major depression. A systematic search of the literature identified double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of major depression versus placebo. Data, reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), was combined in meta-analyses (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020183538). The search identified five RCTs (four double-blind) comparing onabotulinumtoxinA to placebo. OnabotulinumtoxinA was more effective than placebo when administered within the 20-40 IU dose range in double-blind RCTs. The analysis was free of publication bias and significantly heterogeneous. Meta-regression analyses indicated that onabotulinumtoxinA was more efficacious in women and in higher doses in female patients and less effective with polypharmacy, especially when an increasing number of antidepressants were prescribed. The effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA was higher in more recently published double-blind RCTs. The meta-analysis supports the efficacy of the intervention with the results being highly heterogeneous across studies. In view of the heterogeneity of the findings and the significant moderators of benefit (sex, year of study completion and the interaction between sex and dose), more research is required to better understand the role of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of depression.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
OnabotulinumtoxinA is a novel therapeutic intervention whose mechanism of action is believed to modify the negative facial feedback, thus abating symptoms of depression. This putative new antidepressant agent offers minimal systemic side effects and negligible risk of pharmacological interactions. We set out to examine the evidence for the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in major depression.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature identified double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of major depression versus placebo. Data, reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), was combined in meta-analyses (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020183538).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The search identified five RCTs (four double-blind) comparing onabotulinumtoxinA to placebo. OnabotulinumtoxinA was more effective than placebo when administered within the 20-40 IU dose range in double-blind RCTs. The analysis was free of publication bias and significantly heterogeneous. Meta-regression analyses indicated that onabotulinumtoxinA was more efficacious in women and in higher doses in female patients and less effective with polypharmacy, especially when an increasing number of antidepressants were prescribed. The effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA was higher in more recently published double-blind RCTs.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis supports the efficacy of the intervention with the results being highly heterogeneous across studies. In view of the heterogeneity of the findings and the significant moderators of benefit (sex, year of study completion and the interaction between sex and dose), more research is required to better understand the role of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of depression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33719696
doi: 10.1177/0269881121991827
pmc: PMC8366169
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antidepressive Agents
0
Neuromuscular Agents
0
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
EC 3.4.24.69
onabotulinum toxin A
EC 3.4.24.69
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
910-918Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Cephalalgia. 2010 Jul;30(7):804-14
pubmed: 20647171
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Aug;51(2):223-33
pubmed: 15280841
Iran J Public Health. 2017 Jul;46(7):982-984
pubmed: 28845410
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan;35(1):19-28
pubmed: 31609787
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019 Apr 10;12:223-228
pubmed: 31114283
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992 Jan;18(1):17-21
pubmed: 1740562
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:477-485
pubmed: 29940237
J Psychopharmacol. 2015 May;29(5):459-525
pubmed: 25969470
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 1998;2(3):215-9
pubmed: 24940980
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Feb 05;12:279-85
pubmed: 26917961
J Psychiatr Pract. 2016 Mar;22(2):99-110
pubmed: 27138078
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010 Jul;112(6):463-6
pubmed: 20399553
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 May;34(5 Pt 1):788-97
pubmed: 8632076
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 May;52:1-6
pubmed: 24345483
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;75(8):837-44
pubmed: 24910934
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Mar;123(3):321-6
pubmed: 9076240
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366
pubmed: 29477251
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;22(1):1-16
pubmed: 21723712
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 May;46(5):574-81
pubmed: 22364892
Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1680
pubmed: 10335798
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;195(3):194-201
pubmed: 19721106
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007 Dec;9(6):449-59
pubmed: 18221624
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 May 1;37(suppl_1):S4-S11
pubmed: 28388718
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17
pubmed: 17074942