Interarm blood pressure differences and 2-year mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.
Journal
Blood pressure monitoring
ISSN: 1473-5725
Titre abrégé: Blood Press Monit
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9606438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
19
3
2021
medline:
2
7
2021
entrez:
18
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Interarm blood pressure difference (IABPD) was associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in various cohorts previously. In this study, we planned to explore the association between the IABPD obtained with simultaneous measurements in both arms and the risk of mortality over a 2-year follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Simultaneous blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed during initial admission in patients with ACS. Systolic ≥10 mmHg and diastolic ≥5 mmHg absolute IABPD was defined as cutoff values in this study. The relationship of IABPD and all-cause mortality was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analysis. A total of 532 patients with ACS were included in the study. Mean age of the study participants was 60.1 ± 12.6. Patients included in the study were followed for 23.2 ± 7.2 months (median 25.3, min: 0, max: 28.7 months). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients with systolic IABPD ≥ 10 mmHg and systolic IABPD < 10 mmHg had an average survival time of 25.94 ± 0.84 and 25.92 ± 0.38 months (P = 0.925), respectively. Survival times of diastolic IABPD ≥5 mmHg and diastolic IABPD <5 mmHg were 26.44 ± 0.62 and 25.71 ± 0.41 (P = 0.251) months, respectively. In the current study, we did not find a significant association between IABPD and all-cause mortality in patients with ACS in 2-years follow-up. Future studies may be required for further evaluation of the prognostic importance of IABPD in patients with ACS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Interarm blood pressure difference (IABPD) was associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in various cohorts previously. In this study, we planned to explore the association between the IABPD obtained with simultaneous measurements in both arms and the risk of mortality over a 2-year follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS
METHODS
Simultaneous blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed during initial admission in patients with ACS. Systolic ≥10 mmHg and diastolic ≥5 mmHg absolute IABPD was defined as cutoff values in this study. The relationship of IABPD and all-cause mortality was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 532 patients with ACS were included in the study. Mean age of the study participants was 60.1 ± 12.6. Patients included in the study were followed for 23.2 ± 7.2 months (median 25.3, min: 0, max: 28.7 months). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients with systolic IABPD ≥ 10 mmHg and systolic IABPD < 10 mmHg had an average survival time of 25.94 ± 0.84 and 25.92 ± 0.38 months (P = 0.925), respectively. Survival times of diastolic IABPD ≥5 mmHg and diastolic IABPD <5 mmHg were 26.44 ± 0.62 and 25.71 ± 0.41 (P = 0.251) months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In the current study, we did not find a significant association between IABPD and all-cause mortality in patients with ACS in 2-years follow-up. Future studies may be required for further evaluation of the prognostic importance of IABPD in patients with ACS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33734120
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000526
pii: 00126097-202108000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
245-250Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Cyriax EF. Unilateral alterations in blood-pressure caused by unilateral pathological conditions: the differential blood-pressure sign. QJM 1920; os-13:148–164
Mancia G, Rosei EA, Azizi M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:3021–3104
Su HM, Lin TH, Hsu PC, Chu CY, Lee WH, Chen SC, et al. Association of interarm systolic blood pressure difference with atherosclerosis and left ventricular hypertrophy. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41173
Giles TD. Inter-arm difference in systolic blood pressure-“the plot stiffens”. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2013; 15:878–879
Park SJ, Son JW, Park SM, Choi HH, Hong KS. Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure difference and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2017; 263:171–176
Tokitsu T, Yamamoto E, Hirata Y, Fujisue K, Sugamura K, Maeda H, et al. Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure differences and future cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease. J Hypertens 2015; 33:1780–9; discussion 1790
Hwang HJ, Sohn IS, Kim DH, Park CB, Cho JM, Kim CJ. Increased interarm blood pressure difference is associated with autonomic dysfunction and atherosclerosis in patients with chest pain and no history of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2017; 241:25–29
Aboyans V, Criqui MH, McDermott MM, Allison MA, Denenberg JO, Shadman R, Fronek A. The vital prognosis of subclavian stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1540–1545
Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell JL. Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379:905–914
Clark CE, Steele AM, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell JL. Interarm blood pressure difference in people with diabetes: measurement and vascular and mortality implications: a cohort study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:1613–1620
Clark CE, Aboyans V. Interarm blood pressure difference: more than an epiphenomenon. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30:695–697
Guo H, Sun F, Dong L, Chang H, Gu X, Zhang H, et al. The association of four-limb blood pressure with history of stroke in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0139925
Tomiyama H, Ohkuma T, Ninomiya T, Mastumoto C, Kario K, Hoshide S, et al.; Collaborative Group for J-BAVEL-IAD (Japan Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies to Examine the Significance of Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference). Simultaneously measured interarm blood pressure difference and stroke: an individual participants data meta-analysis. Hypertension 2018; 71:1030–1038
Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Campbell JL. The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344:e1327
Chen SC, Chang JM, Tsai YC, Tsai JC, Su HM, Hwang SJ, Chen HC. Association of interleg BP difference with overall and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:1646–1653
Quiroga B, Galán I, García de Vinuesa S, Goicoechea M, Verdalles Ú, Luño J. Interarm systolic blood pressure as a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30:801–806
Kim J, Song TJ, Song D, Lee HS, Nam CM, Nam HS, et al. Interarm blood pressure difference and mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2013; 80:1457–1464
Zhou M, Gao Z, Chen F, Xu H, Dong X, Ma L. The inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Clin Exp Hypertens 2016; 38:317–324
Singh S, Sethi A, Singh M, Khosla K, Grewal N, Khosla S. Simultaneously measured inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences and cardiovascular risk stratification: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Hypertens 2015; 9:640–650.e12
Topouchian J, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Youssef A, Ibanez I, Khabouth J, et al. Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7:709–717
Verberk WJ, Kessels AG, Thien T. Blood pressure measurement method and inter-arm differences: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2011; 24:1201–1208
Singer AJ, Hollander JE. Blood pressure. Assessment of interarm differences. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:2005–2008
Agarwal R, Bunaye Z, Bekele DM. Prognostic significance of between-arm blood pressure differences. Hypertension 2008; 51:657–662
Kranenburg G, Spiering W, de Jong PA, Kappelle LJ, de Borst GJ, Cramer MJ, et al.; SMART study group. Inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences, relations with future vascular events and mortality in patients with and without manifest vascular disease. Int J Cardiol 2017; 244:271–276
Aboyans V. Asymmetrical limbs arterial pressures: a new marker of atherosclerosis. Hypertens Res 2013; 36:394–395
Weinberg I, Gona P, O’Donnell CJ, Jaff MR, Murabito JM. The systolic blood pressure difference between arms and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Med 2014; 127:209–215
Chang Y, Kim J, Kim MH, Kim YJ, Song TJ. Interarm blood pressure difference is associated with early neurological deterioration, poor short-term functional outcome, and mortality in noncardioembolic stroke patients. J Clin Neurol 2018; 14:555–565
Cao K, Xu J, Shangguan Q, Hu W, Li P, Cheng X, Su H. Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cardiol 2015; 189:211–219
Herráiz-Adillo Á, Soriano-Cano A, Martínez-Hortelano JA, Garrido-Miguel M, Mariana-Herráiz JÁ, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Notario-Pacheco B. Simultaneous inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences to diagnose peripheral artery disease: a diagnostic accuracy study. Blood Press 2018; 27:112–119
Lohmann FW, Eckert S, Verberk WJ. Interarm differences in blood pressure should be determined by measuring both arms simultaneously with an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press Monit 2011; 16:37–42
Eguchi K, Yacoub M, Jhalani J, Gerin W, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG. Consistency of blood pressure differences between the left and right arms. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:388–393
Clark CE, Campbell JL, Powell RJ. The interarm blood pressure difference as predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension in primary care: cohort study. J Hum Hypertens 2007; 21:633–638