Towards a Core Outcome Set for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review of Outcomes Reported Following Intact and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
/ complications
Aortic Rupture
/ etiology
Clinical Trials as Topic
/ standards
Europe
/ epidemiology
Humans
Mortality
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Registries
/ standards
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Core outcome set
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
17
09
2020
revised:
07
12
2020
accepted:
04
02
2021
pubmed:
21
3
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
20
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To encompass the needs of all stakeholders and allow effective data synthesis from trials, registries, and other studies; a core outcome set for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is needed. In this first stage, the aim was to report the range, frequency, and time of pre-specified outcomes reported following AAA repair. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases 2010 - 2019 were searched using ProQuest Dialog™. The systematic review was reported to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA), PROSPERO registration CRD42019130119. Outcomes were coded using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy and presented separately for intact and rupture repairs, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair, and time from repair (acute < 90 days vs. ≥ 1 year) (COMET Initiative 1582). For intact AAA and rupture repair, a total of 231 and 70 reports with 589 255 and 177 465 patients respectively were included: only 98 and 19 respectively provided ≥ 1 year outcomes. Most studies were retrospective, with 13 randomised trials of intact AAA repair and five randomised trials of ruptured AAA repair. For intact AAA, the most common pre-specified COMET taxonomy outcomes were mortality (181), vascular complications (137), and re-intervention (52). EVAR studies dominated the vascular outcomes in acute and later time periods: excluding 47 reports from device registries, reduced vascular outcomes to 83. For ruptured AAA, the three most common outcomes were mortality (64), vascular (11), and hospital stay (10). The range of outcomes reported was wide with functioning outcomes reported from most randomised trials but few retrospective studies. This review identifies the paucity of long term data and the disproportionate attention paid to vascular complications vs. patient functioning outcomes, this skew being accentuated by reporting from EVAR device registries. These data will inform focus groups, prior to a pan-European Delphi consensus, involving clinicians, patients, carers and providers, for developing core outcomes for repair of intact and ruptured AAA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33741209
pii: S1078-5884(21)00158-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
909-918Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.