Novel methodology to assess the effect of contouring variation on treatment outcome.
CPHM
contour variation
data mining
treatment outcome modeling
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
revised:
22
03
2021
received:
25
11
2020
accepted:
22
03
2021
pubmed:
28
3
2021
medline:
10
7
2021
entrez:
27
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contouring variation is one of the largest systematic uncertainties in radiotherapy, yet its effect on clinical outcome has never been analyzed quantitatively. We propose a novel, robust methodology to locally quantify target contour variation in a large patient cohort and find where this variation correlates with treatment outcome. We demonstrate its use on biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients. We propose to compare each patient's target contours to a consistent and unbiased reference. This reference was created by auto-contouring each patient's target using an externally trained deep learning algorithm. Local contour deviation measured from the reference to the manual contour was projected to a common frame of reference, creating contour deviation maps for each patient. By stacking the contour deviation maps, time to event was modeled pixel-wise using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM). Hazard ratio (HR) maps for each covariate were created, and regions of significance found using cluster-based permutation testing on the z-statistics. This methodology was applied to clinical target volume (CTV) contours, containing only the prostate gland, from 232 intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. The reference contours were created using ADMIRE® v3.4 (Elekta AB, Sweden). Local contour deviations were computed in a spherical coordinate frame, where differences between reference and clinical contours were projected in a 2D map corresponding to sampling across the coronal and transverse angles every 3°. Time to biochemical recurrence was modeled using the pixel-wise CPHM analysis accounting for contour deviation, patient age, Gleason score, and treated CTV volume. We successfully applied the proposed methodology to a large patient cohort containing data from 232 patients. In this patient cohort, our analysis highlighted regions where the contour variation was related to biochemical recurrence, producing expected and unexpected results: (a) the interface between prostate-bladder and prostate-seminal vesicle interfaces where increase in the manual contour relative to the reference was related to a reduction of risk of biochemical recurrence by 4-8% per mm and (b) the prostate's right, anterior and posterior regions where an increase in the manual contour relative to the reference contours was related to an increase in risk of biochemical recurrence by 8-24% per mm. We proposed and successfully applied a novel methodology to explore the correlation between contour variation and treatment outcome. We analyzed the effect of contour deviation of the prostate CTV on biochemical recurrence for a cohort of more than 200 prostate cancer patients while taking basic clinical variables into account. Applying this methodology to a larger dataset including additional clinically important covariates and externally validating it can more robustly identify regions where contour variation directly relates to treatment outcome. For example, in the prostate case we use to demonstrate our novel methodology, external validation will help confirm or reject the counter-intuitive results (larger contours resulting in higher risk). Ultimately, the results of this methodology could inform contouring protocols based on actual patient outcomes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3234-3242Subventions
Organisme : NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Prostate Cancer UK
ID : RIA15-ST2-031
Organisme : Cancer Research UK via funding to the Cancer Research Manchester Centre
ID : C147/A25254
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C8225/A21133
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424.
National Cancer Registration & Analysis Service, Cancer Research UK. National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service Short Report: Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and Surgical Tumour Resections in England: 2013-2014; 2018; http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_specific_work/topic_specific_work/main_cancer_treatments.
Pascale M, Azinwi CN, Marongiu B, Pesce G, Stoffel F, Roggero E. The outcome of prostate cancer patients treated with curative intent strongly depends on survival after metastatic progression. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:651.
Nyholm T, Jonsson J, Söderström K, et al. Variability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:1-12.
Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A, Cattaneo GM, Calandrino R. Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: Implications for conformal treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 1998;47:285-292.
Villeirs GM, Van Vaerenbergh K, Vakaet L, et al. Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2005;181:424-430.
Vinod SK, Jameson MG, Min M, Holloway LC. Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:169-179.
Cardenas CE, Yang J, Anderson BM, Court LE, Brock KB. Advances in auto-segmentation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29:185-197.
McCarroll RE, Beadle BM, Balter PA, et al. Retrospective validation and clinical implementation of automated contouring of organs at risk in the head and neck: A step toward automated radiation treatment planning for low- And middle-income countries. J Glob Oncol. 2018;2018.
Zabel WJ, Conway JL, Gladwish A, et al. Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-contouring of bladder and rectum for prostate radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021;11:e80-e89.
Gooding MJ, Smith AJ, Tariq M, et al. Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test. Med Phys. 2018;45:5105-5115.
Almeida G, Tavares JMRS. Deep learning in radiation oncology treatment planning for prostate cancer: A systematic review. J Med Syst. 2020;44:1-15.
Unkelbach J, Bortfeld T, Cardenas CE, et al. The role of computational methods for automating and improving clinical target, vol. definition. Radiother Oncol. 2020;153:15-25.
Green A, Vasquez Osorio E, Aznar MC, McWilliam A, van Herk M. Image based data mining using per-voxel cox regression. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1178.
Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH 1987. Vol 21. Association for Computing Machinery. Inc; 1987:163-169.
Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV, Van Herk M. A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. Med Phys. 1999;26:931-940.
Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Berlin: Springer; 2000.
Bullmore ET, Suckling J, Overmeyer S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Taylor E, Brammer MJ. Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999;18:32-42.
Witte MG, Heemsbergen WD, Bohoslavsky R, et al. Relating dose outside the prostate with freedom from failure in the dutch trial 68 Gy vs. 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:131-138.
Ang M, Rajcic B, Foreman D, Moretti K, O’Callaghan ME. Men presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of over 100 ng/mL. BJU Int. 2016;117:68-75.
Heemsbergen WD, Hoogeman MS, Witte MG, Peeters STH, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Increased risk of biochemical and clinical failure for prostate patients with a large rectum at radiotherapy planning: Results from the dutch trial of 68 GY versus 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1418-1424.
Rasch C, Barillot I, Remeijer P, Touw A, Van Herk M, Lebesque JV. Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: A multi-observer study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43:57-66.
Altorjai G, Fotina I, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, et al. Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82.
Nicholls L, Gorayski P, Poulsen M, et al. Maintaining prostate contouring consistency following an educational intervention. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016;63:155-160.
Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. NeuroImage. 2000;11:805-821.
Whitwell JL. Voxel-based morphometry: An automated technique for assessing structural changes in the brain. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9661-9664.
Palma G, Monti S, D'Avino V, et al. A voxel-based approach to explore local dose differences associated with radiation-induced lung damage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:127-133.
McWilliam A, Kennedy J, Hodgson C, Vasquez Osorio E, Faivre-Finn C, van Herk M. Radiation dose to heart base linked with poorer survival in lung cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2017;85:106-113.
Guo Y, Jiang W, Lakshminarayanan P, et al. Spatial radiation dose influence on xerostomia recovery and its comparison to acute incidence in patients with head and neck cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;5:221-230.
Palma G, Monti S, Cella L. Voxel-based analysis in radiation oncology: A methodological cookbook. Phys Medica. 2020;69:192-204.
Shortall J, Palma G, Mistry H, et al. Flogging a dead salmon? Reduced dose posterior to prostate correlates with increased PSA progression in voxel-based analysis of 3 randomised phase 3 trials - Marcello et el. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021.