Embryo morphokinetic score is associated with biomarkers of developmental competence and implantation.
Adult
Biomarkers
/ analysis
Blastocyst
/ cytology
Bone Substitutes
Culture Media
/ analysis
Embryo Culture Techniques
/ methods
Embryo Implantation
/ physiology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
HLA-G Antigens
/ analysis
Humans
Male
MicroRNAs
/ analysis
Proof of Concept Study
Blastocyst
Embryo
Implantation
In vitro fertilization
miRNA
sHLA-G
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
15
12
2020
accepted:
18
03
2021
pubmed:
7
4
2021
medline:
30
12
2021
entrez:
6
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study embryo morphokinetics in relation to release in spent media of molecules with possible roles in development and implantation (miR-20a, miR-30c, and sHLA-G). Data were obtained from embryos generated in standard IVF and ICSI cycles. The Eeva system was used for embryo assessment, based on early morphokinetic parameters and producing a score (1-5, best-worst) corresponding to higher/medium/lower chances of development to blastocyst. miRNAs - mm miR-20a-5p and miR-30c-5p - and sHLA-G were quantified in 25 μl of spent blastocyst media (SBM) collected before vitrification or transfer. Statistical analyses were performed applying Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, and Spearman's correlation coefficient tests, where appropriate. SBM were collected from a total of 172 viable blastocysts. Their analysis showed that concentration of miR-20a was progressively lower as Eeva score increased and probability of development to blastocyst decreased (P = 0.016). The opposite trend was observed in the case of miR-30c, i.e., concentration was higher as score increased and chances of development to blastocyst decreased (P = 0.004). Analysis of sHLA-G revealed a negative correlation with Eeva score, i.e., levels were progressively lower as Eeva score increased and probability of development to blastocyst decreased (R = - 0.388, N = 141, P = 0.001). Our data suggest that morphokinetic algorithms that predict development to blastocyst stage, in fact, also identify embryos with molecular and cellular profiles more consistent with developmental functions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33821429
doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02162-9
pii: 10.1007/s10815-021-02162-9
pmc: PMC8324755
doi:
Substances chimiques
Algipore
0
Biomarkers
0
Bone Substitutes
0
Culture Media
0
HLA-G Antigens
0
MIRN20a microRNA, human
0
MIRN30C2 microRNA, human
0
MicroRNAs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1737-1743Subventions
Organisme : Merck Serono S.p.A., Italy, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
ID : N.A.
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Mar;40(3):347-354
pubmed: 32057674
Dev Biol. 2009 Feb 15;326(2):431-43
pubmed: 19073166
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):276-83
pubmed: 25527613
Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):703-709
pubmed: 30196967
Zygote. 2019 Apr;27(2):78-81
pubmed: 30871646
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;20(1):21-37
pubmed: 30108335
Front Genet. 2019 Apr 05;10:315
pubmed: 31024625
Front Immunol. 2014 May 13;5:198
pubmed: 24860568
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):119-126.e2
pubmed: 27037460
Eur J Immunol. 2002 Feb;32(2):311-5
pubmed: 11807769
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1746-1761
pubmed: 31419301
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Jul;9(1):74-8
pubmed: 15257824
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2231-44
pubmed: 27609980
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):477-85
pubmed: 23518033
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Aug;29(2):156-8
pubmed: 24912418
Fertil Steril. 2005 Jan;83(1):30-6
pubmed: 15652883
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Mar 19;2020(2):hoaa008
pubmed: 32206731
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2658-71
pubmed: 21828117
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1303-9
pubmed: 23993930
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):699-704
pubmed: 24424365
Cells. 2019 Dec 04;8(12):
pubmed: 31817143
Front Immunol. 2020 Jan 14;10:2982
pubmed: 31993049
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):23-31
pubmed: 29149327
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jul;25(7):1691-8
pubmed: 20488801
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Feb;68(3):341-52
pubmed: 21080028
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1295-1300.e2
pubmed: 25225070
Development. 2016 Feb 15;143(4):635-47
pubmed: 26718009
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan;105(1):225-35.e1-3
pubmed: 26453979
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Feb;34(2):137-146
pubmed: 27938863
Fertil Steril. 2012 Dec;98(6):1458-63
pubmed: 22925687
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Jul 15;27(14):2573-2585
pubmed: 29688390
Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):138-46
pubmed: 15498780
Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):412-9.e5
pubmed: 23721712