Determinants of orthopedic physicians' self-reported compliance with surgical site infection prevention: results of the WACH-trial's pilot survey on COM-B factors in a German university hospital.
Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesiologists
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Germany
Guideline Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, University
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Orthopedic Surgeons
Physicians
Pilot Projects
Self Report
Surgical Wound Infection
/ prevention & control
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Behavior change
Guideline adherence
Orthopedics
Physicians
Surgery
Surgical site infections
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2021
07 04 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
22
03
2021
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
17
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), which due to their long-term consequences are especially critical in orthopedic surgery, entails compliance with over 20 individual measures. However, little is known about the psychosocial determinants of such compliance among orthopedic physicians, which impedes efforts to tailor implementation interventions to improve compliance. Thus, for this professional group, this pilot survey examined psychosocial determinants of self-reported compliance, which have been theoretically derived from the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior) model. In 2019, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care university orthopedic clinic in Hannover, Germany, as a pilot for the WACH-trial ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotics Consumption in Surgery]). Fifty-two physicians participated (38 surgeons, 14 anesthesiologists; response rate: 73.2%). The questionnaire assessed self-reported compliance with 26 SSI preventive measures, and its psychosocial determinants (COM-B). Statistical analyses included descriptive, correlational, and linear multiple regression modeling. Self-reported compliance rates for individual measures varied from 53.8 to 100%, with overall compliance (defined for every participant as the mean of his or her self-reported rates for each individual measure) averaging at 88.9% (surgeons: 90%, anesthesiologists: 85.9%; p = 0.097). Of the components identified in factor analyses of the COM-B items, planning, i.e., self-formulated conditional plans to comply, was the least pronounced (mean = 4.3 on the 7-point Likert scale), while motivation was reported to be the strongest (mean = 6.3). Bi-variately, the overall compliance index co-varied with all four COM-B-components, i.e., capabilities (r = 0.512, p < 0.001), opportunities (r = 0.421, p = 0.002), planning (r = 0.378, p = 0.007), and motivation (r = 0.272, p = 0.051). After mutual adjustment and adjustment for type of physician and the number of measures respondents felt responsible for, the final backward regression model included capabilities (β = 0.35, p = 0.015) and planning (β = 0.29, p = 0.041) as COM-B-correlates. Though based on a small sample of orthopedic physicians in a single hospital (albeit in conjunction with a high survey response rate), this study found initial evidence for positive correlations between capabilities and planning skills with self-reported SSI preventive compliance in German orthopedic physicians. Analyses of the WACH-trial will further address the role of these factors in promoting SSI preventive compliance in orthopedic surgery. This survey was conducted as part of the research project WACH ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotic Consumption in Surgery]), which has been registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.drks.de/ ; ID: DRKS00015502).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), which due to their long-term consequences are especially critical in orthopedic surgery, entails compliance with over 20 individual measures. However, little is known about the psychosocial determinants of such compliance among orthopedic physicians, which impedes efforts to tailor implementation interventions to improve compliance. Thus, for this professional group, this pilot survey examined psychosocial determinants of self-reported compliance, which have been theoretically derived from the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior) model.
METHODS
In 2019, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care university orthopedic clinic in Hannover, Germany, as a pilot for the WACH-trial ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotics Consumption in Surgery]). Fifty-two physicians participated (38 surgeons, 14 anesthesiologists; response rate: 73.2%). The questionnaire assessed self-reported compliance with 26 SSI preventive measures, and its psychosocial determinants (COM-B). Statistical analyses included descriptive, correlational, and linear multiple regression modeling.
RESULTS
Self-reported compliance rates for individual measures varied from 53.8 to 100%, with overall compliance (defined for every participant as the mean of his or her self-reported rates for each individual measure) averaging at 88.9% (surgeons: 90%, anesthesiologists: 85.9%; p = 0.097). Of the components identified in factor analyses of the COM-B items, planning, i.e., self-formulated conditional plans to comply, was the least pronounced (mean = 4.3 on the 7-point Likert scale), while motivation was reported to be the strongest (mean = 6.3). Bi-variately, the overall compliance index co-varied with all four COM-B-components, i.e., capabilities (r = 0.512, p < 0.001), opportunities (r = 0.421, p = 0.002), planning (r = 0.378, p = 0.007), and motivation (r = 0.272, p = 0.051). After mutual adjustment and adjustment for type of physician and the number of measures respondents felt responsible for, the final backward regression model included capabilities (β = 0.35, p = 0.015) and planning (β = 0.29, p = 0.041) as COM-B-correlates.
CONCLUSION
Though based on a small sample of orthopedic physicians in a single hospital (albeit in conjunction with a high survey response rate), this study found initial evidence for positive correlations between capabilities and planning skills with self-reported SSI preventive compliance in German orthopedic physicians. Analyses of the WACH-trial will further address the role of these factors in promoting SSI preventive compliance in orthopedic surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This survey was conducted as part of the research project WACH ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotic Consumption in Surgery]), which has been registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.drks.de/ ; ID: DRKS00015502).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33827692
doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00932-9
pii: 10.1186/s13756-021-00932-9
pmc: PMC8025554
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
67Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 29;(4):CD005470
pubmed: 25923419
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):236
pubmed: 32192505
Implement Sci. 2006 Feb 23;1:4
pubmed: 16722571
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;40(8):943-946
pubmed: 31294685
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034266
pubmed: 32075838
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Sep;91(1):59-67
pubmed: 26184662
Am J Infect Control. 2019 May;47(5):545-550
pubmed: 30528170
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Mar 25;8:56
pubmed: 30962918
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Oct;76(2):161-4
pubmed: 20619931
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Apr;61(4):448-473
pubmed: 29589090
Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):347-352
pubmed: 31973621
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Aug;21(6):516-522
pubmed: 32315570
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):287-300
pubmed: 30786946
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 03;11:14
pubmed: 26841877
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Apr;87(4):239-246
pubmed: 28190291
Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):357-62
pubmed: 24612792
Chirurg. 2020 Dec;91(12):1053-1061
pubmed: 32382805
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Nov;91(3):202-10
pubmed: 26321675
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):385-9
pubmed: 23142444
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Jan;40(1):34-8
pubmed: 26443341
Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):161-70
pubmed: 21767036
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jun 27;14(1):196
pubmed: 31248432
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Apr;22(4):765-766
pubmed: 29368312
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Sep 10;:
pubmed: 32914198
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26
pubmed: 22310560
Trials. 2017 Feb 22;18(1):79
pubmed: 28228151
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jan 20;114(3):29-36
pubmed: 28179049
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):617-26.e2
pubmed: 26366787
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Dec 15;114(50):851-857
pubmed: 29271343
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;(8):CD010669
pubmed: 27546228
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):1277-1295
pubmed: 30234463
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Aug;63(4):418-22
pubmed: 16772101
J Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):89-100
pubmed: 26253651
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986