Important ecophysiological roles of non-dominant Actinobacteria in plant residue decomposition, especially in less fertile soils.

Actinobacteria CAZymes DNA-SIP Shotgun metagenomic sequencing Soil fertility Straw decomposition

Journal

Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 04 2021
Historique:
received: 16 12 2020
accepted: 08 02 2021
entrez: 8 4 2021
pubmed: 9 4 2021
medline: 7 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Microbial-driven decomposition of plant residues is integral to carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Actinobacteria, one of the most widely distributed bacterial phyla in soils, are known for their ability to degrade plant residues in vitro. However, their in situ importance and specific activity across contrasting ecological environments are not known. Here, we conducted three field experiments with buried straw in combination with microcosm experiments with While accounting for only 4.6% of the total bacterial abundance, the Actinobacteria encoded 16% of total abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). The taxonomic and functional compositions of the Actinobacteria were, surprisingly, relatively stable during straw decomposition. Slopes of linear regression models between straw chemical composition and Actinobacterial traits were flatter than those for other taxonomic groups at both local and regional scales due to holding genes encoding for full set of CAZymes, nitrogenases, and antibiotic synthetases. Ecological co-occurrence network and This study provided DNA-based evidence that non-dominant Actinobacteria plays a key ecophysiological role in plant residue decomposition as their members possess high proportions of CAZymes and as a group maintain a relatively stable presence during plant residue decomposition both in terms of taxonomic composition and functional roles. Their importance for decomposition was more pronounced in less fertile soils where their possession functional genes and interspecies interactions stood out more. Our work provides new ecophysiological angles for the understanding of the importance of Actinobacteria in global carbon cycling. Video abstract.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Microbial-driven decomposition of plant residues is integral to carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Actinobacteria, one of the most widely distributed bacterial phyla in soils, are known for their ability to degrade plant residues in vitro. However, their in situ importance and specific activity across contrasting ecological environments are not known. Here, we conducted three field experiments with buried straw in combination with microcosm experiments with
RESULTS
While accounting for only 4.6% of the total bacterial abundance, the Actinobacteria encoded 16% of total abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). The taxonomic and functional compositions of the Actinobacteria were, surprisingly, relatively stable during straw decomposition. Slopes of linear regression models between straw chemical composition and Actinobacterial traits were flatter than those for other taxonomic groups at both local and regional scales due to holding genes encoding for full set of CAZymes, nitrogenases, and antibiotic synthetases. Ecological co-occurrence network and
CONCLUSIONS
This study provided DNA-based evidence that non-dominant Actinobacteria plays a key ecophysiological role in plant residue decomposition as their members possess high proportions of CAZymes and as a group maintain a relatively stable presence during plant residue decomposition both in terms of taxonomic composition and functional roles. Their importance for decomposition was more pronounced in less fertile soils where their possession functional genes and interspecies interactions stood out more. Our work provides new ecophysiological angles for the understanding of the importance of Actinobacteria in global carbon cycling. Video abstract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33827695
doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01032-x
pii: 10.1186/s40168-021-01032-x
pmc: PMC8028251
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Video-Audio Media

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

84

Références

Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64
pubmed: 17601128
Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):1065-71
pubmed: 18627410
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Sep;6(9):693-9
pubmed: 18587409
Biotechnol Lett. 2018 Feb;40(2):335-341
pubmed: 29204770
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;2(6):936-943
pubmed: 29662222
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):14784-9
pubmed: 11742094
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;11(7):1658-71
pubmed: 19236445
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 03;7:60
pubmed: 26870020
Ecol Lett. 2016 May;19(5):554-63
pubmed: 26947573
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:399-426
pubmed: 8561466
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 30;13:113
pubmed: 22646978
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2016 Sep 8;70:235-54
pubmed: 27607553
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 01;8:2376
pubmed: 29250052
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 May;12(5):327-40
pubmed: 24658329
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Mar 2;83(6):
pubmed: 28087533
Trends Microbiol. 2010 Apr;18(4):157-63
pubmed: 20202846
Trends Microbiol. 2013 Dec;21(12):641-51
pubmed: 24139848
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Aug;19(8):3132-3151
pubmed: 28488752
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014 Oct;29:171-83
pubmed: 25104562
ISME J. 2014 Aug;8(8):1553-65
pubmed: 24739623
Nat Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 05;1(1):15
pubmed: 28812567
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Jul;2(7):541-51
pubmed: 15197390
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Aug;19(8):2949-2963
pubmed: 28447371
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):2350-5
pubmed: 10347012
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 Aug 2;11:216
pubmed: 30083229
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82
pubmed: 16723398
ISME J. 2011 Sep;5(9):1414-25
pubmed: 21430787
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Oct;18(10):546-558
pubmed: 32483324
Sci Rep. 2018 May 22;8(1):7981
pubmed: 29789525
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jan;8(1):15-25
pubmed: 19946288
Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8
pubmed: 18516045
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 May;72(5):3489-97
pubmed: 16672495
Waste Manag. 2007;27(6):850-3
pubmed: 16919930
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21
pubmed: 23975157
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;79(5):1545-54
pubmed: 23263967
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Jan 1;31(1):87-94
pubmed: 10620722
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
ISME J. 2015 Jun;9(6):1477-80
pubmed: 25350158
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;5(10):828-41
pubmed: 14510836
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Jan 29;9:22
pubmed: 26834834
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2894-901
pubmed: 18344350
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 14;8:299
pubmed: 17697349

Auteurs

Yuanyuan Bao (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.

Jan Dolfing (J)

Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Zhiying Guo (Z)

Soil Subcenter of Chinese Ecological Research Network, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Ruirui Chen (R)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Meng Wu (M)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Zhongpei Li (Z)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Xiangui Lin (X)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Youzhi Feng (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China. yzfeng@issas.ac.cn.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages

Classifications MeSH