Soil bacterial communities and their associated functions for forest restoration on a limestone mine in northern Thailand.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
08
2020
accepted:
07
03
2021
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Opencast mining removes topsoil and associated bacterial communities that play crucial roles in soil ecosystem functioning. Understanding the community composition and functioning of these organisms may lead to improve mine-rehabilitation practices. We used a culture-dependent method, combined with Illumina sequencing, to compare the taxonomic richness and composition of living bacterial communities in opencast mine substrates and young mine-rehabilitation plots, with those of soil in adjacent remnant forest at a limestone mine in northern Thailand. We further investigated the effects of soil physico-chemical factors and ground-flora cover on the same. Although, loosened subsoil, brought in to initiate rehabilitation, improved water retention and facilitated plant re-establishment, it did not increase the population density of living microbes substantially within 9 months. Planted trees and sparse ground flora in young rehabilitation plots had not ameliorated the micro-habitat enough to change the taxonomic composition of the soil bacteria compared with non-rehabilitated mine sites. Viable microbes were significantly more abundant in forest soil than in mine substrates. The living bacterial community composition differed significantly, between the forest plots and both the mine and rehabilitation plots. Proteobacteria dominated in forest soil, whereas Firmicutes dominated in samples from both mine and rehabilitation plots. Although, several bacterial taxa could survive in the mine substrate, soil ecosystem functions were greatly reduced. Bacteria, capable of chitinolysis, aromatic compound degradation, ammonification and nitrate reduction were all absent or rare in the mine substrate. Functional redundancy of the bacterial communities in both mine substrate and young mine-rehabilitation soil was substantially reduced, compared with that of forest soil. Promoting the recovery of microbial biomass and functional diversity, early during mine rehabilitation, is recommended, to accelerate soil ecosystem restoration and support vegetation recovery. Moreover, if inoculation is included in mine rehabilitation programs, the genera: Bacillus, Streptomyces and Arthrobacter are likely to be of particular interest, since these genera can be cultivated easily and this study showed that they can survive under the extreme conditions that prevail on opencast mines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33831034
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248806
pii: PONE-D-20-25028
pmc: PMC8031335
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Calcium Carbonate
H0G9379FGK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248806Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests. The Siam Cement (Lampang) Co., Ltd. allowed access to the experimental sites and funded field work and lab analyses. However, the company played no role in experimental design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, drafting the manuscript and decision to submit the work for publication. None of the authors were paid by the company. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e115024
pubmed: 25502754
Mol Ecol. 2010 Dec;19(24):5555-65
pubmed: 21050295
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Jul;81(1):111-23
pubmed: 22329626
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203812
pubmed: 30212559
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e66103
pubmed: 23824063
Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2711
pubmed: 30515138
Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;9(9):2211-9
pubmed: 17686019
Front Microbiol. 2016 Sep 08;7:1415
pubmed: 27660627
Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1034-9
pubmed: 18497287
Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1272-7
pubmed: 27634532
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e66829
pubmed: 23826151
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan 7;41(1):e1
pubmed: 22933715
Chemosphere. 2003 Sep;52(9):1559-70
pubmed: 12867189
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Aug;71(6):875-80
pubmed: 16518623
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 08;10(6):e0128272
pubmed: 26053848
Microb Ecol. 2010 May;59(4):710-23
pubmed: 20016980
Front Microbiol. 2019 Mar 22;10:387
pubmed: 30967844
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006 Apr-May;89(3-4):459-63
pubmed: 16622790
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Nat Plants. 2016 Jul 11;2:16107
pubmed: 27398907
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3034-43
pubmed: 24610850
Microb Ecol. 1991 Dec;22(1):249-56
pubmed: 24194340
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188-96
pubmed: 17947321
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Nov 1;95(11):
pubmed: 31647534
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 05;7:376
pubmed: 27092105
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;66(10):4361-5
pubmed: 11010883
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 17;16(10):
pubmed: 31108967
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug 1;84(16):
pubmed: 29915105
Arch Microbiol. 2011 Feb;193(2):77-81
pubmed: 21136040
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 04;7:39911
pubmed: 28051173
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 10;10:1617
pubmed: 31354694