Genomic characteristics and clinical effect of the emergent SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage in London, UK: a whole-genome sequencing and hospital-based cohort study.
Journal
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
06
02
2021
revised:
05
03
2021
accepted:
08
03
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
11
9
2021
entrez:
15
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emergence of variants with specific mutations in key epitopes in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 raises concerns pertinent to mass vaccination campaigns and use of monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to describe the emergence of the B.1.1.7 variant of concern (VOC), including virological characteristics and clinical severity in contemporaneous patients with and without the variant. In this cohort study, samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR that were collected from Nov 9, 2020, for patients acutely admitted to one of two hospitals on or before Dec 20, 2020, in London, UK, were sequenced and analysed for the presence of VOC-defining mutations. We fitted Poisson regression models to investigate the association between B.1.1.7 infection and severe disease (defined as point 6 or higher on the WHO ordinal scale within 14 days of symptoms or positive test) and death within 28 days of a positive test and did supplementary genomic analyses in a cohort of chronically shedding patients and in a cohort of remdesivir-treated patients. Viral load was compared by proxy, using PCR cycle threshold values and sequencing read depths. Of 496 patients with samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR and who met inclusion criteria, 341 had samples that could be sequenced. 198 (58%) of 341 had B.1.1.7 infection and 143 (42%) had non-B.1.1.7 infection. We found no evidence of an association between severe disease and death and lineage (B.1.1.7 vs non-B.1.1.7) in unadjusted analyses (prevalence ratio [PR] 0·97 [95% CI 0·72-1·31]), or in analyses adjusted for hospital, sex, age, comorbidities, and ethnicity (adjusted PR 1·02 [0·76-1·38]). We detected no B.1.1.7 VOC-defining mutations in 123 chronically shedding immunocompromised patients or in 32 remdesivir-treated patients. Viral load by proxy was higher in B.1.1.7 samples than in non-B.1.1.7 samples, as measured by cycle threshold value (mean 28·8 [SD 4·7] vs 32·0 [4·8]; p=0·0085) and genomic read depth (1280 [1004] vs 831 [682]; p=0·0011). Emerging evidence exists of increased transmissibility of B.1.1.7, and we found increased virus load by proxy for B.1.1.7 in our data. We did not identify an association of the variant with severe disease in this hospitalised cohort. University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, University College London/University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Emergence of variants with specific mutations in key epitopes in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 raises concerns pertinent to mass vaccination campaigns and use of monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to describe the emergence of the B.1.1.7 variant of concern (VOC), including virological characteristics and clinical severity in contemporaneous patients with and without the variant.
METHODS
In this cohort study, samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR that were collected from Nov 9, 2020, for patients acutely admitted to one of two hospitals on or before Dec 20, 2020, in London, UK, were sequenced and analysed for the presence of VOC-defining mutations. We fitted Poisson regression models to investigate the association between B.1.1.7 infection and severe disease (defined as point 6 or higher on the WHO ordinal scale within 14 days of symptoms or positive test) and death within 28 days of a positive test and did supplementary genomic analyses in a cohort of chronically shedding patients and in a cohort of remdesivir-treated patients. Viral load was compared by proxy, using PCR cycle threshold values and sequencing read depths.
FINDINGS
Of 496 patients with samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR and who met inclusion criteria, 341 had samples that could be sequenced. 198 (58%) of 341 had B.1.1.7 infection and 143 (42%) had non-B.1.1.7 infection. We found no evidence of an association between severe disease and death and lineage (B.1.1.7 vs non-B.1.1.7) in unadjusted analyses (prevalence ratio [PR] 0·97 [95% CI 0·72-1·31]), or in analyses adjusted for hospital, sex, age, comorbidities, and ethnicity (adjusted PR 1·02 [0·76-1·38]). We detected no B.1.1.7 VOC-defining mutations in 123 chronically shedding immunocompromised patients or in 32 remdesivir-treated patients. Viral load by proxy was higher in B.1.1.7 samples than in non-B.1.1.7 samples, as measured by cycle threshold value (mean 28·8 [SD 4·7] vs 32·0 [4·8]; p=0·0085) and genomic read depth (1280 [1004] vs 831 [682]; p=0·0011).
INTERPRETATION
Emerging evidence exists of increased transmissibility of B.1.1.7, and we found increased virus load by proxy for B.1.1.7 in our data. We did not identify an association of the variant with severe disease in this hospitalised cohort.
FUNDING
University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, University College London/University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33857406
pii: S1473-3099(21)00170-5
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00170-5
pmc: PMC8041359
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1246-1256Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests MS reports funding support for at-cost development and manufacture of UCL-Ventura continuous positive airway pressure device for patients with COVID-19 from the UK Department of Health and Social Care, during the conduct of the study; grants and advisory board fees paid to institution research fund from NewB; grants from DSTL; advisory board and speaking fees paid into institutional research fund from Amormed, Biotest, General ElectricBaxter, Baxter, Roche, Bayer, and Shionogi; and grants from Critical Pressure and Apollo Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Euro Surveill. 2017 Feb 23;22(8):
pubmed: 28251889
J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):e23-e24
pubmed: 33548358
Nature. 2020 May;581(7807):221-224
pubmed: 32225175
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 30;11(1):5493
pubmed: 33127906
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 1;34(23):4121-4123
pubmed: 29790939
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:193-218
pubmed: 27216777
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7853):277-282
pubmed: 33545711
BMJ. 2020 Dec 16;371:m4857
pubmed: 33328153
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):349-359
pubmed: 33444539
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):690-693
pubmed: 32562422
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 15;30(22):3276-8
pubmed: 25095880
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197
pubmed: 32539990
Cell. 2020 Sep 3;182(5):1295-1310.e20
pubmed: 32841599
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10):
pubmed: 32669382
Glob Chall. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):33-46
pubmed: 31565258
JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):529-531
pubmed: 33404586
Microb Genom. 2016 Nov 30;2(11):e000093
pubmed: 28348833
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2332-2347.e16
pubmed: 33761326
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32):
pubmed: 32794447