How do employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers? A systematic review.
Employment conditions
Mental health
Psychosocial workplace exposure
Review
Risk of bias
Work
Young people
Journal
Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology
ISSN: 1433-9285
Titre abrégé: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804358
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
11
10
2020
accepted:
07
04
2021
pubmed:
19
4
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
18
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the quality of the research about how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers, and to summarize the available evidence. We undertook a systematic search of three databases using a tiered search strategy. Studies were included if they: (a) assessed employment conditions such as working hours, precarious employment, contract type, insecurity, and flexible work, or psychosocial workplace exposures such as violence, harassment and bullying, social support, job demand and control, effort-reward imbalance, and organizational justice; (b) included a validated mental health measure; and (c) presented results specific to young people aged ≤ 30 years or were stratified by age group to provide an estimate for young people aged ≤ 30 years. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. Nine studies were included in the review. Four were related to employment conditions, capturing contract type and working hours. Five studies captured concepts relevant to psychosocial workplace exposures including workplace sexual harassment, psychosocial job quality, work stressors, and job control. The quality of the included studies was generally low, with six of the nine at serious risk of bias. Three studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the qualitative synthesis, and results of these showed contemporaneous exposure to sexual harassment and poor psychosocial job quality was associated with poorer mental health outcomes among young workers. Longitudinal evidence showed that exposure to low job control was associated with incident depression diagnosis among young workers. The findings of this review illustrate that even better studies are at moderate risk of bias. Addressing issues related to confounding, selection of participants, measurement of exposures and outcomes, and missing data will improve the quality of future research in this area and lead to a clearer understanding of how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young people. Generating high-quality evidence is particularly critical given the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on young people's employment. In preparing for a post-pandemic world where poor-quality employment conditions and exposure to psychosocial workplace exposures may become more prevalent, rigorous research must exist to inform policy to protect the mental health of young workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33866384
doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02077-x
pii: 10.1007/s00127-021-02077-x
pmc: PMC8053023
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1147-1160Subventions
Organisme : Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
ID : FT180100075
Organisme : Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award
ID : DE200100607
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Partnership Project
ID : APP1151843
Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114
pubmed: 29432858
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):217-228
pubmed: 31506742
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Oct;69(10):694-700
pubmed: 22693265
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jul;48(5):544-558
pubmed: 31291827
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):429-443
pubmed: 31165899
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78
pubmed: 27174304
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 31;16(11):
pubmed: 31159344
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:104-11
pubmed: 26409168
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Aug;67(8):548-55
pubmed: 20576923
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9
pubmed: 18994664
Soc Ment Health. 2011 Jul 1;1(2):89-105
pubmed: 22140650
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0227336
pubmed: 31887201
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):50-58
pubmed: 27918610
Psychol Med. 2017 Jun;47(8):1342-1356
pubmed: 28122650
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229-53
pubmed: 24641559
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Oct;71(10):730-6
pubmed: 24556535
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;60(4):277-86
pubmed: 20511268
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Feb;45(1):73-84
pubmed: 27885160
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(4):331-6
pubmed: 26773063
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;74(4):301-310
pubmed: 28108676
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Jul;93(5):611-622
pubmed: 31932956
Environ Int. 2019 Jan;122:168-184
pubmed: 30473382
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 8;16(1):142
pubmed: 28789653
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):359-64
pubmed: 17551351
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):235-247
pubmed: 31901944
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Aug;33(8):550-9
pubmed: 19758702
Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Fall;16(4):1047-70
pubmed: 15704827
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 29;15:985
pubmed: 26419739
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Jul 1;43(4):294-306
pubmed: 28306759