Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 18 01 2021
revised: 25 02 2021
accepted: 19 03 2021
pubmed: 23 4 2021
medline: 5 10 2021
entrez: 22 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Given the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a pre-fusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (spike glycoprotein-clamp [sclamp]). We did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, block-randomised trial of the sclamp subunit vaccine in a single clinical trial site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Healthy adults (aged ≥18 to ≤55 years) who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported no close contact with anyone with active or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and tested negative for pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups and received two doses via intramuscular injection 28 days apart of either placebo, sclamp vaccine at 5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg, or one dose of sclamp vaccine at 45 μg followed by placebo. Participants and study personnel, except the dose administration personnel, were masked to treatment. The primary safety endpoints included solicited local and systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 months after dosing. Here, data are reported up until day 57. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were antigen-specific IgG ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assays assessed at 28 days after each dose. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04495933. Between June 23, 2020, and Aug 17, 2020, of 314 healthy volunteers screened, 120 were randomly assigned (n=24 per group), and 114 (95%) completed the study up to day 57 (mean age 32·5 years [SD 10·4], 65 [54%] male, 55 [46%] female). Severe solicited reactions were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in participants receiving placebo (two [8%] of 24) and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose (three [3%] of 96). Both solicited reactions and unsolicited adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in participants receiving placebo and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine. Solicited reactions occurred in 19 (79%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 86 (90%) of 96 receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Unsolicited adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 35 (36%) of 96 participants receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a similar antigen-specific response irrespective of dose: 4 weeks after the initial dose (day 29) with 5 μg dose (geometric mean titre [GMT] 6400, 95% CI 3683-11 122), with 15 μg dose (7492, 4959-11 319), and the two 45 μg dose cohorts (8770, 5526-13 920 in the two-dose 45 μg cohort; 8793, 5570-13 881 in the single-dose 45 μg cohort); 4 weeks after the second dose (day 57) with two 5 μg doses (102 400, 64 857-161 676), with two 15 μg doses (74 725, 51 300-108 847), with two 45 μg doses (79 586, 55 430-114 268), only a single 45 μg dose (4795, 2858-8043). At day 57, 67 (99%) of 68 participants who received two doses of sclamp vaccine at any concentration produced a neutralising immune response, compared with six (25%) of 24 who received a single 45 μg dose and none of 22 who received placebo. Participants receiving two doses of sclamp vaccine elicited similar neutralisation titres, irrespective of dose: two 5 μg doses (GMT 228, 95% CI 146-356), two 15 μg doses (230, 170-312), and two 45 μg doses (239, 187-307). This first-in-human trial shows that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, MF59-adjuvanted, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein elicits strong immune responses with a promising safety profile. However, the glycoprotein 41 peptide present in the clamp created HIV diagnostic assay interference, a possible barrier to widespread use highlighting the criticality of potential non-spike directed immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response. Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and further philanthropic sources listed in the acknowledgments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Given the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a pre-fusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (spike glycoprotein-clamp [sclamp]).
METHODS
We did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, block-randomised trial of the sclamp subunit vaccine in a single clinical trial site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Healthy adults (aged ≥18 to ≤55 years) who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported no close contact with anyone with active or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and tested negative for pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups and received two doses via intramuscular injection 28 days apart of either placebo, sclamp vaccine at 5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg, or one dose of sclamp vaccine at 45 μg followed by placebo. Participants and study personnel, except the dose administration personnel, were masked to treatment. The primary safety endpoints included solicited local and systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 months after dosing. Here, data are reported up until day 57. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were antigen-specific IgG ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assays assessed at 28 days after each dose. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04495933.
FINDINGS
Between June 23, 2020, and Aug 17, 2020, of 314 healthy volunteers screened, 120 were randomly assigned (n=24 per group), and 114 (95%) completed the study up to day 57 (mean age 32·5 years [SD 10·4], 65 [54%] male, 55 [46%] female). Severe solicited reactions were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in participants receiving placebo (two [8%] of 24) and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose (three [3%] of 96). Both solicited reactions and unsolicited adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in participants receiving placebo and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine. Solicited reactions occurred in 19 (79%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 86 (90%) of 96 receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Unsolicited adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 35 (36%) of 96 participants receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a similar antigen-specific response irrespective of dose: 4 weeks after the initial dose (day 29) with 5 μg dose (geometric mean titre [GMT] 6400, 95% CI 3683-11 122), with 15 μg dose (7492, 4959-11 319), and the two 45 μg dose cohorts (8770, 5526-13 920 in the two-dose 45 μg cohort; 8793, 5570-13 881 in the single-dose 45 μg cohort); 4 weeks after the second dose (day 57) with two 5 μg doses (102 400, 64 857-161 676), with two 15 μg doses (74 725, 51 300-108 847), with two 45 μg doses (79 586, 55 430-114 268), only a single 45 μg dose (4795, 2858-8043). At day 57, 67 (99%) of 68 participants who received two doses of sclamp vaccine at any concentration produced a neutralising immune response, compared with six (25%) of 24 who received a single 45 μg dose and none of 22 who received placebo. Participants receiving two doses of sclamp vaccine elicited similar neutralisation titres, irrespective of dose: two 5 μg doses (GMT 228, 95% CI 146-356), two 15 μg doses (230, 170-312), and two 45 μg doses (239, 187-307).
INTERPRETATION
This first-in-human trial shows that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, MF59-adjuvanted, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein elicits strong immune responses with a promising safety profile. However, the glycoprotein 41 peptide present in the clamp created HIV diagnostic assay interference, a possible barrier to widespread use highlighting the criticality of potential non-spike directed immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response.
FUNDING
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and further philanthropic sources listed in the acknowledgments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33887208
pii: S1473-3099(21)00200-0
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00200-0
pmc: PMC8055208
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adjuvants, Immunologic 0
Antibodies, Neutralizing 0
Antibodies, Viral 0
COVID-19 Vaccines 0
MF59 oil emulsion 0
Polysorbates 0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus 0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 0
Squalene 7QWM220FJH

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04495933']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1383-1394

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : HHSN272201400008C
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1428-1434
pubmed: 32661393
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):459-462
pubmed: 32237278
Curr Opin Immunol. 2017 Aug;47:44-51
pubmed: 28734174
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Mar 13;5(176):176ra32
pubmed: 23486778
Vaccine. 2010 Oct 21;28(45):7331-6
pubmed: 20813217
Vaccine. 2009 Nov 16;27(49):6959-65
pubmed: 19751689
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 14;222(8):1280-1288
pubmed: 32761124
J Mol Biol. 2020 Sep 4;432(19):5212-5226
pubmed: 32710986
Cell Rep Med. 2021 Mar 16;2(3):100208
pubmed: 33564749
J Virol. 2004 Apr;78(7):3572-7
pubmed: 15016880
Clin Transl Immunology. 2021 Apr 05;10(4):e1269
pubmed: 33841880
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2320-2332
pubmed: 32877576
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Dec 16;23(3):189-95
pubmed: 26677198
Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1877-80
pubmed: 19969117
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):578-582
pubmed: 32731258
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1544-1555
pubmed: 32722908
Sci Rep. 2016 May 27;6:26494
pubmed: 27231124
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Feb 14;10(428):
pubmed: 29444980
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Feb;38(2):773-80
pubmed: 10655384
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):453-455
pubmed: 32284614
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1920-1931
pubmed: 32663912
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 5;9(1):5661
pubmed: 30952887
J Exp Med. 2011 Jan 17;208(1):181-93
pubmed: 21220454
Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):281-292.e6
pubmed: 32155444
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Sep;38(9):1073-1078
pubmed: 32704169
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593
pubmed: 32785213
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):12265-12270
pubmed: 30420505
Science. 2020 Sep 25;369(6511):1603-1607
pubmed: 32732280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109(23):9047-52
pubmed: 22615367
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):930
pubmed: 33287717
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35421
pubmed: 22536382
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Sep;12(9):2351-6
pubmed: 27269431
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):806-811
pubmed: 32434945
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 21;6:19570
pubmed: 26791076
PLoS Pathog. 2008 May 02;4(5):e1000055
pubmed: 18451982
EBioMedicine. 2015 Nov 27;3:67-78
pubmed: 26870818
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):22077
pubmed: 33328567
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 33440088

Auteurs

Keith J Chappell (KJ)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: k.chappell@uq.edu.au.

Francesca L Mordant (FL)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Zheyi Li (Z)

Department of Immunology and Infectious Disease, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Danushka K Wijesundara (DK)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Paula Ellenberg (P)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Julia A Lackenby (JA)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Stacey T M Cheung (STM)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Naphak Modhiran (N)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Michael S Avumegah (MS)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Christina L Henderson (CL)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Kym Hoger (K)

The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Paul Griffin (P)

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Nucleus Network Brisbane Clinic, Herston, QLD, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Mater Health, QLD, Australia.

Jillian Bennet (J)

Tanawell Nominees, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Luca Hensen (L)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Wuji Zhang (W)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Thi H O Nguyen (THO)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Sara Marrero-Hernandez (S)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Kevin J Selva (KJ)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Amy W Chung (AW)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Mai H Tran (MH)

TetraQ, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.

Peter Tapley (P)

TetraQ, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.

James Barnes (J)

WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Patrick C Reading (PC)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Suellen Nicholson (S)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Stavroula Corby (S)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Thomas Holgate (T)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Bruce D Wines (BD)

Immune Therapies Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

P Mark Hogarth (PM)

Immune Therapies Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Katherine Kedzierska (K)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Damian F J Purcell (DFJ)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Charani Ranasinghe (C)

Department of Immunology and Infectious Disease, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Kanta Subbarao (K)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Daniel Watterson (D)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Paul R Young (PR)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Trent P Munro (TP)

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH