Clinicopathological features and treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): A large, retrospective multicenter European study.


Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 15 12 2020
revised: 03 03 2021
accepted: 09 03 2021
pubmed: 26 4 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 25 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) account for ≤1% of all GISTs. Consequently, evidence to guide clinical decision-making is limited. Clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with primary oesophageal GIST from seven European countries were collected retrospectively. Eighty-three patients were identified, and median follow up was 55.0 months. At diagnosis, 59.0% had localized disease, 25.3% locally advanced and 13.3% synchronous metastasis. A biopsy (Fine Needle aspiration n = 29, histological biopsy n = 31) was performed in 60 (72.3%) patients. The mitotic count was low (<5 mitoses/50 High Power Fields (HPF)) in 24 patients and high (≥5 mitoses/50 HPF) in 27 patients. Fifty-one (61.4%) patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resection. The most common reasons to not perform an immediate resection (n = 31) were; unresectable or metastasized GIST, performance status/comorbidity, patient refusal or ongoing neo-adjuvant therapy. The type of resections were enucleation (n = 11), segmental resection (n = 6) and oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction (n = 33), with median tumour size of 3.3 cm, 4.5 cm and 7.7 cm, respectively. In patients treated with enucleation 18.2% developed recurrent disease. The recurrence rate in patients treated with segmental resection was 16.7% and in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction 36.4%. Larger tumours (≥4.0 cm) and high (>5/5hpf) mitotic count were associated with worse disease free survival. Based on the current study, enucleation can be recommended for oesophageal GIST smaller than 4 cm, while oesophagectomy should be preserved for larger tumours. Patients with larger tumours (>4 cm) and/or high mitotic count should be treated with adjuvant therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) account for ≤1% of all GISTs. Consequently, evidence to guide clinical decision-making is limited.
METHODS
Clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with primary oesophageal GIST from seven European countries were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS
Eighty-three patients were identified, and median follow up was 55.0 months. At diagnosis, 59.0% had localized disease, 25.3% locally advanced and 13.3% synchronous metastasis. A biopsy (Fine Needle aspiration n = 29, histological biopsy n = 31) was performed in 60 (72.3%) patients. The mitotic count was low (<5 mitoses/50 High Power Fields (HPF)) in 24 patients and high (≥5 mitoses/50 HPF) in 27 patients. Fifty-one (61.4%) patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resection. The most common reasons to not perform an immediate resection (n = 31) were; unresectable or metastasized GIST, performance status/comorbidity, patient refusal or ongoing neo-adjuvant therapy. The type of resections were enucleation (n = 11), segmental resection (n = 6) and oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction (n = 33), with median tumour size of 3.3 cm, 4.5 cm and 7.7 cm, respectively. In patients treated with enucleation 18.2% developed recurrent disease. The recurrence rate in patients treated with segmental resection was 16.7% and in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction 36.4%. Larger tumours (≥4.0 cm) and high (>5/5hpf) mitotic count were associated with worse disease free survival.
CONCLUSION
Based on the current study, enucleation can be recommended for oesophageal GIST smaller than 4 cm, while oesophagectomy should be preserved for larger tumours. Patients with larger tumours (>4 cm) and/or high mitotic count should be treated with adjuvant therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33895019
pii: S0748-7983(21)00375-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.234
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Imatinib Mesylate 8A1O1M485B

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2173-2181

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mahmoud Mohammadi (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.mohammadi@lumc.nl.

Nikki S IJzerman (NS)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Peter Hohenberger (P)

Division of Surgical Oncology & Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Piotr Rutkowski (P)

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Warsaw, Poland.

Robin L Jones (RL)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust / Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Javier Martin-Broto (J)

Medical Oncology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Alessandro Gronchi (A)

Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Patrick Schöffski (P)

Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.

Nikolaos Vassos (N)

Division of Surgical Oncology & Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Sheima Farag (S)

Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Marco Baia (M)

Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Astrid W Oosten (AW)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Neeltje Steeghs (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ingrid M E Desar (IME)

Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

An K L Reyners (AKL)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

J W van Sandick (JW)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Esther Bastiaannet (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Hans Gelderblom (H)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Yvonne Schrage (Y)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; European School of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH