Patients Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Experience a Constellation of Symptoms and Consequences Representing a Unique Syndrome: A Report from the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery (PROPS) Delphi Consensus Study.


Journal

Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 4 5 2021
medline: 15 10 2021
entrez: 3 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research. The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function. This was a Delphi consensus study. Three rounds of surveys were used to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement. Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients, including patients, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists or other clinicians. A consensus statement was the main outcome. patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists or nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement. The study was limited by online recruitment bias. This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571. Un Informe de los Resultados Reportados por los Pacientes Posterior a la Cirugía de Reservorio (PROPS) Estudio de Consenso DelphiANTECEDENTES:Los resultados funcionales después de la creación del reservorio ileoanal han sido estudiados; sin embargo, existe una gran variabilidad en la forma en que se definen y reportan los resultados relevantes. Más importante aún, la perspectiva de los pacientes no se ha representado a la hora de decidir qué resultados deberían ser el foco de investigación.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal era crear en el paciente una definición centrada de los síntomas principales que debería incluirse en los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:Estudio de consenso Delphi.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se emplearon tres rondas de encuestas para seleccionar elementos de alta prioridad. La votación de la encuesta fue seguida por una serie de reuniones de consulta de pacientes en línea que se utilizan para aclarar las tendencias de votación. Se realizo una reunión de consenso final en línea con representación de los tres paneles de expertos para finalizar una declaración de consenso.PACIENTES:Se eligieron partes interesadas expertas para correlacionar con el escenario clínico del equipo multidisciplinario que atiende a los pacientes con reservorio: pacientes, cirujanos colorrectales, gastroenterólogos / otros médicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Declaración de consenso.RESULTADOS:Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes, 62 cirujanos colorrectales y 48 gastroenterólogos / enfermeras especialistas completaron las tres rondas Delphi. 53 pacientes participaron en grupos focales en línea. 161 interesados participaron en la reunión de consenso final. Al concluir la reunión de consenso, siete síntomas intestinales y siete consecuencias de someterse a una cirugía de reservorio ileoanal se incluyeron en la declaración de consenso final.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de reclutamiento en línea.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio es el primero en identificar resultados funcionales claves después de la cirugía de reservorio con información directa de un gran panel de pacientes con reservorio ileoanal. La inclusión de pacientes en todas las etapas del proceso de consenso permitió un verdadero enfoque centrado en el paciente para definir los dominios principales en los que debería centrarse los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research.
OBJECTIVE
The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function.
DESIGN
This was a Delphi consensus study.
SETTING
Three rounds of surveys were used to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement.
PATIENTS
Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients, including patients, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists or other clinicians.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
A consensus statement was the main outcome.
RESULTS
patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists or nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement.
LIMITATIONS
The study was limited by online recruitment bias.
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571.
LOS PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA DE RESERVORIO ILEOANAL EXPERIMENTAN UNA CONSTELACIN DE SNTOMAS Y CONSECUENCIAS QUE REPRESENTAN UN SNDROME UNICO
Un Informe de los Resultados Reportados por los Pacientes Posterior a la Cirugía de Reservorio (PROPS) Estudio de Consenso DelphiANTECEDENTES:Los resultados funcionales después de la creación del reservorio ileoanal han sido estudiados; sin embargo, existe una gran variabilidad en la forma en que se definen y reportan los resultados relevantes. Más importante aún, la perspectiva de los pacientes no se ha representado a la hora de decidir qué resultados deberían ser el foco de investigación.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal era crear en el paciente una definición centrada de los síntomas principales que debería incluirse en los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:Estudio de consenso Delphi.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se emplearon tres rondas de encuestas para seleccionar elementos de alta prioridad. La votación de la encuesta fue seguida por una serie de reuniones de consulta de pacientes en línea que se utilizan para aclarar las tendencias de votación. Se realizo una reunión de consenso final en línea con representación de los tres paneles de expertos para finalizar una declaración de consenso.PACIENTES:Se eligieron partes interesadas expertas para correlacionar con el escenario clínico del equipo multidisciplinario que atiende a los pacientes con reservorio: pacientes, cirujanos colorrectales, gastroenterólogos / otros médicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Declaración de consenso.RESULTADOS:Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes, 62 cirujanos colorrectales y 48 gastroenterólogos / enfermeras especialistas completaron las tres rondas Delphi. 53 pacientes participaron en grupos focales en línea. 161 interesados participaron en la reunión de consenso final. Al concluir la reunión de consenso, siete síntomas intestinales y siete consecuencias de someterse a una cirugía de reservorio ileoanal se incluyeron en la declaración de consenso final.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de reclutamiento en línea.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio es el primero en identificar resultados funcionales claves después de la cirugía de reservorio con información directa de un gran panel de pacientes con reservorio ileoanal. La inclusión de pacientes en todas las etapas del proceso de consenso permitió un verdadero enfoque centrado en el paciente para definir los dominios principales en los que debería centrarse los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33938531
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002099
pii: 00003453-202107000-00011
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Video-Audio Media

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

861-870

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.

Références

Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2:85–88.
Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222:120–127.
Fazio VW, O’Riordain MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999230:575–586.
McKenna NP, Dozois EJ, Pemberton JH, Lightner AL. Impact of sex on 30-day complications and long-term functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:619–625.
de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, Vermeire S, et al. Long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in 191 patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1261–1266.
Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, et al. International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg. 2014;259:728–734.
Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255:922–928.
Lee GC, Cavallaro PM, Savitt LR, et al. Bowel function after J-pouch may be more complex than previously appreciated: a comprehensive analysis to highlight existing knowledge gaps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:207–216.
Brandsborg S, Chen TY, Nicholls RJ, Laurberg S. Difference between patients’ and clinicians’ perception of pouch dysfunction and its impact on quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:O136–O140.
McNair AG, Heywood N, Tiernan J, Verjee A, Bach SP, Fearnhead NS; ORACLE Collaboration. A national patient and public colorectal research agenda: integration of consumer perspectives in bowel disease through early consultation. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O75–O85.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381.
Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 202113):ED000041.
Sahnan K, Tozer PJ, Adegbola SO, et al.; ENiGMA collaborators. Developing a core outcome set for fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2019;68:226–238.
Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou L, et alLARS International Collaborative Group. International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22:331–341.
Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hultén L. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:50–56.
Lovegrove RE, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, Tilney HS, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis PP. Development of a pouch functional score following restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:945–951.
Brandsborg S, Nicholls RJ, Mortensen LS, Laurberg S. Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: development and validation of a new scoring system for pouch dysfunction and quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:e719–e725.

Auteurs

Paul M Cavallaro (PM)

Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Nicola S Fearnhead (NS)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Ian P Bissett (IP)

Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Mantaj S Brar (MS)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Thomas E Cataldo (TE)

Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Beth Israel-Deaconess Health Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Rasheed Clarke (R)

Patient Advocate, Blogger, www.rasheedclarke.com.

Paula Denoya (P)

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital. Stony Brook, New York.

Amber L Elder (AL)

Patient Advocate, Blogger, www.colitisninja.com.

Krisztina B Gecse (KB)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Samantha Hendren (S)

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Stefan Holubar (S)

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Nimalan Jeganathan (N)

Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Pär Myrelid (P)

Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Beth-Anne Norton (BA)

Crohn's and Colitis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Steven D Wexner (SD)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida.

Lauren Wilson (L)

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Karen Zaghiyan (K)

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Liliana Bordeianou (L)

Massachusetts General Hospital Colorectal Surgery and Crohn's Colitis Centers, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH