A cell surface-exposed protein complex with an essential virulence function in Ustilago maydis.


Journal

Nature microbiology
ISSN: 2058-5276
Titre abrégé: Nat Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674869

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
received: 01 02 2021
accepted: 24 03 2021
pubmed: 5 5 2021
medline: 18 9 2021
entrez: 4 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Plant pathogenic fungi colonizing living plant tissue secrete a cocktail of effector proteins to suppress plant immunity and reprogramme host cells. Although many of these effectors function inside host cells, delivery systems used by pathogenic bacteria to translocate effectors into host cells have not been detected in fungi. Here, we show that five unrelated effectors and two membrane proteins from Ustilago maydis, a biotrophic fungus causing smut disease in corn, form a stable protein complex. All seven genes appear co-regulated and are only expressed during colonization. Single mutants arrest in the epidermal layer, fail to suppress host defence responses and fail to induce non-host resistance, two reactions that likely depend on translocated effectors. The complex is anchored in the fungal membrane, protrudes into host cells and likely contacts channel-forming plant plasma membrane proteins. Constitutive expression of all seven complex members resulted in a surface-exposed form in cultured U. maydis cells. As orthologues of the complex-forming proteins are conserved in smut fungi, the complex may become an interesting fungicide target.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33941900
doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00896-x
pii: 10.1038/s41564-021-00896-x
pmc: PMC8159752
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fungal Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

722-730

Références

Fisher, M. C. et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484, 186–194 (2012).
pubmed: 22498624 doi: 10.1038/nature10947
Snetselaar, K. & Mims, C. Infection of maize stigmas by Ustilago maydis: light and electron microscopy. Phytopathology 83, 843–850 (1993).
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-83-843
Lanver, D. et al. The biotrophic development of Ustilago maydis studied by RNA-Seq analysis. Plant Cell 30, 300–323 (2018).
pubmed: 29371439 pmcid: 5868686 doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00764
Doehlemann, G. et al. Pep1, a secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis, is required for successful invasion of plant cells. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000290 (2009).
pubmed: 19197359 pmcid: 2631132 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000290
Djamei, A. et al. Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature 478, 395–398 (2011).
pubmed: 21976020 doi: 10.1038/nature10454
Hemetsberger, C., Herrberger, C., Zechmann, B., Hillmer, M. & Doehlemann, G. The Ustilago maydis effector Pep1 suppresses plant immunity by inhibition of host peroxidase activity. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002684 (2012).
pubmed: 22589719 pmcid: 3349748 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002684
Mueller, A. N., Ziemann, S., Treitschke, S., Assmann, D. & Doehlemann, G. Compatibility in the Ustilago maydis–maize interaction requires inhibition of host cysteine proteases by the fungal effector Pit2. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003177 (2013).
pubmed: 23459172 pmcid: 3573112 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003177
Tanaka, S. et al. A secreted Ustilago maydis effector promotes virulence by targeting anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize. eLife 3, e01355 (2014).
pubmed: 24473076 pmcid: 3904489 doi: 10.7554/eLife.01355
Redkar, A. et al. A secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis guides maize leaf cells to form tumors. Plant Cell 27, 1332–1351 (2015).
pubmed: 25888589 pmcid: 4558682 doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.131086
Ma, L. S. et al. The Ustilago maydis repetitive effector Rsp3 blocks the antifungal activity of mannose-binding maize proteins. Nat. Commun. 9, 1711 (2018).
pubmed: 29703884 pmcid: 5923269 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04149-0
Han, X. et al. A kiwellin disarms the metabolic activity of a secreted fungal virulence factor. Nature 565, 650–653 (2019).
pubmed: 30651637 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0857-9
Lanver, D. et al. Ustilago maydis effectors and their impact on virulence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 409 (2017).
pubmed: 28479603 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.33
Redkar, A., Matei, A. & Doehlemann, G. Insights into host cell modulation and induction of new cells by the corn smut Ustilago maydis. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 899 (2017).
pubmed: 28611813 pmcid: 5447062 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00899
Schmitz, L., McCotter, S., Kretschmer, M., Kronstad, J. W. & Heimel, K. Transcripts and tumors: regulatory and metabolic programming during biotrophic phytopathogenesis. F1000Res. 7, 1812 (2018).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16404.1
Lo Presti, L. & Kahmann, R. How filamentous plant pathogen effectors are translocated to host cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 19–24 (2017).
pubmed: 28460240 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.005
Khan, M., Seto, D., Subramaniam, R. & Desveaux, D. Oh, the places they’ll go! A survey of phytopathogen effectors and their host targets. Plant J. 93, 651–663 (2018).
pubmed: 29160935 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13780
Lanver, D. et al. Plant surface cues prime Ustilago maydis for biotrophic development. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004272 (2014).
pubmed: 25033195 pmcid: 4102580 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004272
Kamper, J. et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature 444, 97–101 (2006).
pubmed: 17080091 doi: 10.1038/nature05248
Schipper, K. Charakterisierung eines Ustilago maydis Genclusters, das für drei neuartige sekretierte Effektoren kodiert. PhD thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg (2009).
Mendoza-Mendoza, A. et al. Physical-chemical plant-derived signals induce differentiation in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 895–911 (2009).
pubmed: 19170880 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06567.x
Dickman, M., Williams, B., Li, Y., de Figueiredo, P. & Wolpert, T. Reassessing apoptosis in plants. Nat. Plants 3, 773–779 (2017).
pubmed: 28947814 doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0020-x
Kabbage, M., Kessens, R., Bartholomay, L. C. & Williams, B. The life and death of a plant cell. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 375–404 (2017).
pubmed: 28125285 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111655
Ustun, S., Hafren, A. & Hofius, D. Autophagy as a mediator of life and death in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 40, 122–130 (2017).
pubmed: 28946008 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.011
Seitner, D., Uhse, S., Gallei, M. & Djamei, A. The core effector Cce1 is required for early infection of maize by Ustilago maydis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 2277–2287 (2018).
pubmed: 29745456 pmcid: 6638113 doi: 10.1111/mpp.12698
Snetselaar, K. M. & Mims, C. W. Sporidial fusion and infection of maize seedlings by the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. Mycologia 84, 193–203 (1992).
doi: 10.1080/00275514.1992.12026126
Treuner-Lange, A. et al. PilY1 and minor pilins form a complex priming the type IVa pilus in Myxococcus xanthus. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18803-z
Oliveira-Garcia, E. & Valent, B. How eukaryotic filamentous pathogens evade plant recognition. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 26, 92–101 (2015).
pubmed: 26162502 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.06.012
Matei, A. & Doehlemann, G. Cell biology of corn smut disease—Ustilago maydis as a model for biotrophic interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 34, 60–66 (2016).
pubmed: 27504540 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.07.020
Laity, C., Giasson, L., Campbell, R. & Kronstad, J. Heterozygosity at the b mating-type locus attenuates fusion in Ustilago maydis. Curr. Genet. 27, 451–459 (1995).
pubmed: 7586032 doi: 10.1007/BF00311215
Ayliffe, M. & Sorensen, C. K. Plant nonhost resistance: paradigms and new environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 50, 104–113 (2019).
pubmed: 31075541 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.011
Stam, R., Mantelin, S., McLellan, H. & Thilliez, G. The role of effectors in nonhost resistance to filamentous plant pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 582 (2014).
pubmed: 25426123 pmcid: 4224059 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00582
Hof, A., Zechmann, B., Schwammbach, D., Huckelhoven, R. & Doehlemann, G. Alternative cell death mechanisms determine epidermal resistance in incompatible barley–Ustilago interactions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 27, 403–414 (2014).
pubmed: 24329174 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-13-0317-R
Hemetsberger, C. et al. The fungal core effector Pep1 is conserved across smuts of dicots and monocots. New Phytol. 206, 1116–1126 (2015).
pubmed: 25628012 doi: 10.1111/nph.13304
Liang, L. The Role of Stp1, a Secreted Effector, in the Biotrophic Interaction of Ustilago maydis and its Host Plant Maize. PhD thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg (2013).
Bauer, R., Oberwinkler, F. & Vánky, K. Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Can. J. Bot. 75, 1273–1314 (1997).
doi: 10.1139/b97-842
Mims, C., Rodriguez-Lother, C. & Richardson, E. Ultrastructure of the host–pathogen interface in daylily leaves infected by the rust fungus Puccinia hemerocallidis. Protoplasma 219, 221–226 (2002).
pubmed: 12099222 doi: 10.1007/s007090200023
Li, P. et al. Rice aquaporin PIP1;3 and harpin Hpa1 of bacterial blight pathogen cooperate in a type III effector translocation. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 3057–3073 (2019).
Elmore, J. M. & Coaker, G. The role of the plasma membrane H
pubmed: 21300757 pmcid: 3107590 doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq083
Rapisarda, C. & Fronzes, R. Secretion systems used by bacteria to subvert host functions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 1–42 (2018).
de Koning-Ward, T. F., Dixon, M. W., Tilley, L. & Gilson, P. R. Plasmodium species: master renovators of their host cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 494–507 (2016).
pubmed: 27374802 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.79
Marapana, D. S. et al. Plasmepsin V cleaves malaria effector proteins in a distinct endoplasmic reticulum translocation interactome for export to the erythrocyte. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 1010–1022 (2018).
pubmed: 30127496 doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0219-2
Khang, C. H. et al. Translocation of Magnaporthe oryzae effectors into rice cells and their subsequent cell-to-cell movement. Plant Cell 22, 1388–1403 (2010).
pubmed: 20435900 pmcid: 2879738 doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.069666
Giraldo, M. C. et al. Two distinct secretion systems facilitate tissue invasion by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Commun. 4, 1996 (2013).
pubmed: 23774898 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2996
Kamper, J. A PCR-based system for highly efficient generation of gene replacement mutants in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271, 103–110 (2004).
pubmed: 14673645 doi: 10.1007/s00438-003-0962-8
Broomfield, P. E. & Hargreaves, J. A. A single amino-acid change in the iron-sulphur protein subunit of succinate dehydrogenase confers resistance to carboxin in Ustilago maydis. Curr. Genet. 22, 117–121 (1992).
pubmed: 1423716 doi: 10.1007/BF00351470
Loubradou, G., Brachmann, A., Feldbrugge, M. & Kahmann, R. A homologue of the transcriptional repressor Ssn6p antagonizes cAMP signalling in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 719–730 (2001).
pubmed: 11359577 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02424.x
Schuster, M. & Kahmann, R. CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing approaches in filamentous fungi and oomycetes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 130, 43–53 (2019).
Holliday, R. in Handbook of Genetics Vol. 1 (ed. King, R. C.) Ch. 31 (Plenum Press, 1974).
Krombach, S., Reissmann, S., Kreibich, S., Bochen, F. & Kahmann, R. Virulence function of the Ustilago maydis sterol carrier protein 2. New Phytol. 220, 553–566 (2018).
pubmed: 29897130 doi: 10.1111/nph.15268
James, P., Halladay, J. & Craig, E. A. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144, 1425–1436 (1996).
pubmed: 8978031 pmcid: 1207695 doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1425
Redkar, A., Jaeger, E. & Doehlemann, G. Visualization of growth and morphology of fungal hyphae in planta using WGA-AF488 and propidium iodide co-staining. Bio-Protoc. 101, e2942 (2018).
Brachmann, A., Weinzierl, G., Kamper, J. & Kahmann, R. Identification of genes in the bW/bE regulatory cascade in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 42, 1047–1063 (2001).
pubmed: 11737646 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02699.x
Sesack, S. R., Miner, L. H. & Omelchenko, N. in Neuroanatomical Tract-Tracing 3 (eds Zaborszky, L. et al.) Ch. 2 (Springer, 2006).
Snetselaar, K. M. & Mims, C. W. Light and electron microscopy of Ustilago maydis hyphae in maize. Mycol. Res. 98, 347–355 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80463-2
Gómez-Santos, N., Glatter, T., Koebnik, R., Świątek-Połatyńska, M. A. & Søgaard-Andersen, L. A TonB-dependent transporter is required for secretion of protease PopC across the bacterial outer membrane. Nat. Commun. 10, 1360 (2019).
pubmed: 30911012 pmcid: 6434023 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09366-9
Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731–740 (2016).
pubmed: 27348712 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901
Doehlemann, G., Reissmann, S., Aßmann, D., Fleckenstein, M. & Kahmann, R. Two linked genes encoding a secreted effector and a membrane protein are essential for Ustilago maydis-induced tumour formation. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 751–766 (2011).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2
pubmed: 11846609 doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Hoff, K. J. & Stanke, M. WebAUGUSTUS—a web service for training AUGUSTUS and predicting genes in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W123–W128 (2013).
pubmed: 23700307 pmcid: 3692069 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt418
Ye, Z. et al. Comparative whole-genome analysis reveals artificial selection effects on Ustilago esculenta genome. DNA Res. 24, 635–648 (2017).
pubmed: 28992048 pmcid: 5726479 doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsx031
Zambanini, T., Buescher, J. M., Meurer, G., Wierckx, N. & Blank, L. M. Draft genome sequence of Ustilago trichophora RK089, a promising malic acid producer. Genome Announc. 4, e00749-16 (2016).
pubmed: 27469969 pmcid: 4966473 doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00749-16
Benevenuto, J., Teixeira-Silva, N. S., Kuramae, E. E., Croll, D. & Monteiro-Vitorello, C. B. Comparative genomics of smut pathogens: insights from orphans and positively selected genes into host specialization. Front. Microbiol. 9, 660 (2018).
pubmed: 29681893 pmcid: 5897528 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00660
Schirawski, J. et al. Pathogenicity determinants in smut fungi revealed by genome comparison. Science 330, 1546–1548 (2010).
pubmed: 21148393 doi: 10.1126/science.1195330
Schweizer, G. et al. Positively selected effector genes and their contribution to virulence in the smut fungus Sporisorium reilianum. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 629–645 (2018).
pubmed: 29390140 pmcid: 5811872 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy023
Zuther, K. et al. Host specificity of Sporisorium reilianum is tightly linked to generation of the phytoalexin luteolinidin by Sorghum bicolor. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25, 1230–1237 (2012).
pubmed: 22670753 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-11-0314
Dutheil, J. Y. et al. A tale of genome compartmentalization: the evolution of virulence clusters in smut fungi. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 681–704 (2016).
pubmed: 26872771 pmcid: 4824034 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw026
Laurie, J. D. et al. Genome comparison of barley and maize smut fungi reveals targeted loss of RNA silencing components and species-specific presence of transposable elements. Plant Cell 24, 1733–1745 (2012).
pubmed: 22623492 pmcid: 3442566 doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097261
Rabe, F. et al. A complete toolset for the study of Ustilago bromivora and Brachypodium sp. as a fungal–temperate grass pathosystem. eLife 5, e20522 (2016).
pubmed: 27835569 pmcid: 5106213 doi: 10.7554/eLife.20522
Sharma, R., Mishra, B., Runge, F. & Thines, M. Gene loss rather than gene gain is associated with a host jump from monocots to dicots in the smut fungus Melanopsichium pennsylvanicum. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 2034–2049 (2014).
pubmed: 25062916 pmcid: 4159001 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu148
Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W636–W641 (2019).
Armenteros, J. J. A. et al. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 420–423 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580 (2001).
pubmed: 11152613 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315

Auteurs

Nicole Ludwig (N)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Stefanie Reissmann (S)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Kerstin Schipper (K)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Institut für Mikrobiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Carla Gonzalez (C)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Daniela Assmann (D)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Timo Glatter (T)

Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Marino Moretti (M)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.

Lay-Sun Ma (LS)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Karl-Heinz Rexer (KH)

Department of Evolutionary Ecology of Plants, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Karen Snetselaar (K)

Department of Biology, Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Regine Kahmann (R)

Department of Organismic Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany. kahmann@mpi-marburg.mpg.de.

Articles similaires

Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Capsicum Disease Resistance Plant Diseases Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Ralstonia solanacearum
Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol
Genome, Bacterial Virulence Phylogeny Genomics Plant Diseases

Classifications MeSH